selenak: (Default)
selenak ([personal profile] selenak) wrote 2014-04-07 02:11 pm (UTC)

True, but given that Shakespeare's Lord Stanley isn't an entertaining opportunistic double crosser but a boring goodie with nary a line, shouldn't he rather play Buckingham? He's played another Buckingham (the one who was buddies with Charles II.) before, too .

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting