selenak: (Judgment Day by Rolina_Gate)
selenak ([personal profile] selenak) wrote2012-09-12 09:16 am

Ugh

I hate bullies. Internet bullies who believe they're propagating "social justice" while doing their bullying are a particularly revolting suspecies. God knows I have my own criticisms of Moffat's writings, but death threats? With an added low of also going after twelve-years Caitlin Blackwood, who plays young Amelia Pond? What she said.

Not that this is new. I'm reminded of the internet back in Children of Earth, Day 4 and after time, when it were RTD and James Moran, but then Rusty wasn't on Twitter. Or going back to the Buffy days, those charmers who wished miscarriage on Marti Noxon when she was pregnant because they hated seasons 6 and 7 of BTVS.

Fandom can be fantastic to be in, but every now and then it makes you recall that "fan" comes from "fanatic", and not in a good way.
likeadeuce: (Default)

[personal profile] likeadeuce 2012-09-12 05:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, the thing I was trying to say but in much smarter words. Thank you!

(And I didn't mean to suggest there's nothing to 'the tone argument' discussion -- especially as I think it was originally identified as problematic when used by privileged people who could not accept their own statements being criticized, against less privileged people. Just that I'm wary of it because it seems to have trickled down, as you say, to "toxic silencing and group think.")

[personal profile] meri 2012-09-12 05:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I actually think it's important to be very wary of any argumentative technique when it's used to silence or shame. That's when it, as a tool, needs to be re-examined or it becomes meaningless and hurtful. And it has so obviously gone past being helpful in fandom at the moment. >.
bobbiewickham: Kalinda Sharma of The Good Wife (Default)

[personal profile] bobbiewickham 2012-09-14 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
Jumping in here to say that I agree, and not just in fandom--I've seen its rampant abuse on feminist blogs of late. People feel entitled to say whatever they want to those who disagree, provided that they can identify their opponents as being more privileged along some axis. This in turn leads to some amusing Oppression Olympics (e.g., "I'm entitled to call you names because, while you are a woman, I am a transgendered woman of color with a child." Response: "Oh yeah? I'm a working-class woman with clinic depression, so screw you, and here are some names for you too!").

None of this really helps either discussion or social justice, though it may give some a temporary glow of self-righteousness.