selenak: (Visionless - Foundation)
2025-03-23 03:38 pm

A miniseries and two episodes of ongoing shows

Adolescence: British miniseries in four episodes, conceived and written by Stephen Graham (who also plays one of the key roles) and Jack Thorne, directed by Philip Barantini, who, as the review of the Guardian put it, must be a glutton for one take punishment, because one very noteworthy element of this miniseries is that each of these four episodes is filmed in one uncut take. Now despite watching a lot of movies and tv, long takes aren't something I immediately notice, and sometimes only after they were pointed out by someone else, but not here, because the long take that starts with the episode and ends with the episode (meaning each of the four episodes are "in real time" is thematically highly relevant and not a fancy gimmick - it really heightens that sense of claustrophobia and intimacy, feeling locked up with the characters it depicts.

The cast is terrific, both the adults and the young cast, with the three outstanding teens being fifteen years old Owen Cooper playing thirteen years old Jamie Miller (who "only" appears on screen in two episodes but is much talked about in the other two), Amelie Pease who plays his older sister Lisa and Fatima Bojang as Jade, the best friend of Katie, the girl whose murder kicks off the plot. Now this miniseries is explicitly not a whodunit - the only episode in which that is even a question is the first one, when we follow Jamie being arrested in the povs of both the leading detectives and his father (played by Stephen Graham) who is horrified and of course believes his son's "I didn't do anything" denials - but a "whydunit" - i.e. why would a thirteen years old boy kill his female classmate of the same age? More somewhat spoilery observations follow. )

Daredevil ?.04: Okay, the "We build this city" school choir was hysterical, and had me giggling for hours afterwards. On the more serious side, the spoilery encounter was superbly played by both actors.

Wheel of Time 3.04.: Awesome aesthetics. Vague spoilers to follow. )
selenak: (SixBaltarunreality by Shadowserenity)
2025-03-17 06:34 pm

Several

Daredevil Reborn .03: continues to be captivating. It also ad me muse on how Netflix wildly varied with its presentation of the fictional NYPD. Spoilery musings ensue. )


Wheel of Time 3.01 - 3.03: Still haven't read the books, still am very entertained and pleased by the show. BTW, Elayne being called Elayne didn't register with me as Arthurian last season, but the last episode giving her brothers Gwaine and Galahand and a mother Morgause, just spelled a bit differently but certainly sounding like these names, had me snort. And hellow, awesome actress from The Expanse as Elaida! Now I'm listening to a spoilerfree for newbies (like me) commentary podcast which I like but which briefly took me out of my enjoyment when the host said there were only two fictional characters he hated, and one cwas a character introduced in this episode, and the other was Gaeta from Battlestar Galactica. Why would anyone hate Gaeta? #JusticeforGaeta !

Lastly: there is now a German version of Ghosts. (Thanks to [personal profile] kathyh, I'm familiar with the British original but not the US version.) I's a pretty successful adaptation, and like the reviewer below, I'm amused and impressed at some of the choices specific to these version that took into account you can't literally do the same thing in a German context. (For example, making the military ghost NOT a 20th century German colonel, either WWI or WWII, for all the obvious reasons but a Roman soldier instead, and making the Pat the male boyscout character instead a female very early 1980s earnest idealist type. I fully expect Svenja to have been on all the anti nuclear power demonstrations and at Wackersdorf.) See also this review:

selenak: (Jessica & Matt)
2025-03-05 04:32 pm

Of fictional Presidents, Mayors, Billionaires and Vigilantes

Aside from being RL busy and getting the daily horror show from the US like everyone else, I did watch a couple of fictiional things. My collected reviews:

Zero Day (Miniseries, Netflix): solidly suspenseful, but ultimately fails at what it wants to be, i.e. a 70s style political thriller. Not least because it was to be a political thriller without taking a stand in rl politics. Also, there are a couple of moments where you glimpse what could have been a really good work of fiction but then the narrative swerves from what it has seemingly set up to a far less interesting turn. Starring Robert de Niro as retired President George Mullen, the last President, we're told, to command bi partisan respect. When there is a cyber attack that shuts down all online traffic on every device in the US for a solid minute, with a threat of more to come, he's put in charge of a commission to investigate the causes. Said commission is given even more extra powers and habeas corpus suspensions than the Patriot Act after 9/11, and the reason why George Mullen gets appointed by his successor, who is black and female and played by Angela Bassett, is because only he is trusted to not abuse those powers. Other players include an evil tech billionaire (female), a slimy Mr. Speaker (male), George's estranged daughter, a Congresswoman, and an populist influencer who has Tucker Carlson's mannerisms but a pseudo left wing vocabulary. No party affiliations are mentioned for anyone, but it's pretty obvious the Speaker is supposed to be Republican and George's daughter a liberal Democrat. Emphasis on "supposed", because like I said, the miniseries shies away from any actual politics. We're told, repeatedly, that the country is deeply divided and nothing can be done anymore, but no one ever mentions issues the country is divided about. There are the usual red herrings while George investigates - and like I said, technically the miniseries is solidly suspenseful, and de Niro is good in the part - but each time the show could rise above avarage, there are these frustrating turns. For example: Spoilers ensue. )

But what really pushed it from "suspenseful with flaws" into "failed" territory for me was the ending. Spoilers are willing to accept stories with witches and ghosts, but not THIS type of fairy tale. ) In conclusion, you can skip this one, despite some fine actors present.

Paradise (First season, Disney + outside of the US which is where I am, Hulu inside the US): Now we're talking. This one, otoh, does everything right. It's not just suspenseful, it's twisty, with lots of interesting characters whose motivations make sense. And excellent actors, including Sterling K. Brown in the lead, James Marsden as the second most important male role, Julianne Nicholson in the most important female role and Sarah Shahi. If you're unspoiled, which I was, the pilot first makes you believe it's just a murder mystery (it opens with a dead body, so that's no spoiler) with some political trappings since the murdered man is a (former?) President, and our lead part of the team of Secret Agents responsible for his security and inevitably both an investigator and a suspect. But before the pilot is over, the first of many great twist lands, because the setting is revealed: no, we're not in some idyllic town where the President has retired after his term of office, we're really in a very different spoilery genre ) And more questions pop up through the season as some are answered. The mixture of twists and reveals is handled just right. Whle Xavier remains the lead throughout, the way the episodes give the central spotlight to a different character in addition to him in each episode, thus introducing the ensemble who each have their own stories and motivations reminded me a bit of Lost. As did the way the interlocking stories sometimes return to the same scene(s) from different povs.

Now, this series when it tackles politics doesn't shy away of actually going deeper than just "we're so divided, but surely a patriotic speech and an outside threat will fix it". Here, too, we have a shady female tech billionaire. (Btw, I'm not complaining that we get tech sisters instead of tech bros in those thrillers. The women might be evil, but they are far more human and interesting than You Know W'ho. Well, Samantha aka Sinatra is, not so much the lady in "Zero Day". The reason why Sam(antha) is code named "Sinatra" is because of a cruel but not inaccurate joke Cal's (also billionaire) father made, telling his son "you think you're Dean Martin, but you're not, you're just Peter Lawford, only in the Rat Pack because of who you're related to". Sinatra is the one with the actual power in the top hierarchy, but while she's the season's main antagonist (not the killer, though), we also get an entire episode focused on her early on (second or third episode, I think), learning her backstory and what made her who she is. This series gets the difference between explaining and excusing so very right, it's awesome. And each time I was afraid it would go for the easy way out - as with a spoilery fear ) it didn't. And everyone was so human, including those with limited screentime.

Sterling K. Brown delivered a fantastic lead performance, and there wasn't a weak link in the cast, including the younger actors. And the last but one episode where we finally saw how a spoilery momentous event took place ) And despite the spoilery ) genre, as many examples of people following their better nature as there was of people following their worst. In conclusion: this one is a must.

Daredevil: Born Again (episodes 1 + 2): Which technically is a first season, except it's not, it's a fourth season of the Netflix show, now produced by the House of Mouse. Now as opposed to Jessica Jones and Luke Cage, Matt Murdoch and friends actually finished their Netflix show in a better place than where they started from, with the Netflix showing having used its third season for a reconciliation arc, so I was in two minds when I heard about this sequel. Because a state of happiness does not Daredevil drama make, so it was a given things woiuld have to get worse again. Otoh I was delighted by the Matt cameo in Spider-Man: No Way Home and his turning up in She-Hulk, and also liked The Other Guy's (to put only vaguely spoilery) appearances in Hawkeye and Echo, so concluded I was in the market for this now show.

Spoilers for the first two episodes ensue. )
selenak: (Missy by Yamiinsane123)
2025-02-17 11:31 am

Candyhearts!

Candyhearts has gone live!

I reveived a lovely glimpse at Ahsoka and the droid Huyang (I have mixed feelings about the Ahsoka miniseries, but Huyang - first introduced in Clone Wars, voiced by David Tennant in both incarnations - and his dynamic with Ahsoka I genuinely adored): Purpose.

And here are some other stories I liked at first sight:


Doctor Who:

Meddling in the Affairs of Humans: in which Susan ships Barbara/Ian, as I'm sure she did, and decides to do something about it.

Unwanted Memories: how Missy felt about what's happening with Bill in Bill's season finale, to put it as unspoilery as possible.



Hawkeye:

Fall in head first: in which Kate Bishop and Yelena Belova experience a delightful nursing-wounds/realising feelings kind of story, which captures their banter exactly and makes me want to rewatch Hawkeye.


Moon Knight:

Je te souris, tu me surprends: how Steven feels about kissing Layla. Adorable, and also a great look at Layla herself.
selenak: (DuncanAmanda - Kathyh)
2025-01-05 01:01 pm

Candyhearts Exchange Letter

Dear Writer,

this exchange will be a highlight in my Februar, and I'm very grateful to you for creating something for me in a fandom we share. My prompts are just that, prompts, not absolutes; if you have an idea that doesn't fit with any of them, but features (some of) the characters I asked for, I'll love it with added joyful surprise.

General DNWs:

A/B/O - if you want to write a werewolf AU for any of the canons I nominated, be my guest, but I'm really not into this particular type of story -, infantilisation, golden showers. Character bashing. If the characters in question canonically loathe someone, you can of course include this, but I think you know the difference between that and having all characters agree about how terrible X is. Rape, unless it's canon and you want to explore how Character Y deals with the aftermath, or something like that.

General likes:

Character exploration, characters helping each other recover from trauma, messed up and/or co-dependent family relationships, witty banter, friendship against the odds, the occasional light moment in a darker story or conversely some serious character stuff thrown into a comedy fic.

Treats: are very welcome.

18th Century RPF )

Highlander: The Series )


Agatha All Along )


Black Sails )

Star Wars: Ahsoka )
selenak: (Tony Stark by Gettingdrastic)
2025-01-02 09:11 am
Entry tags:

Januar Meme: The Return of RDJ and the pivot from Kang to Doom: opinions

[personal profile] lightofdaye asked me for my opinion(s) on the impending return of RDJ (as Dr. Doom, not Tony Stark) to the MCU and the pivot from Kang to Doom in terms of main antagonist to be in the future movies. I see these as two different issues, so I'll deal with the later ones first.

Now, even folks like yours truly who tries her best to avoid spoilers did hear that essentially, Kang the character was dropped because of the actor's behaviour. While they could have recast - after all, there's precedent, see also: Rhodey - , I wouldn't be surprised if this was a welcome opportunity to drop the character as well as the actor. Because honestly, in the two cases where I've seen Kang - Loki season 1 (I didn't watch more than the opening episode of s2, not because the show got bad but because I never really connected to it to begin with, and the day has only so many hours) and Ant-Man: Quantummania - he didn't exactly wow me as a character. IMO as always.

One can endlessly argue about what makes and doesn't make a good villain/antagonist (not always the same thing). I think it depends on the type of story you want to tell. Often (not always), it helps with the villain/antagonist has a personal connection to the hero, or is a plausible "What if?" version of him/her. For example, I would say the Marvel cinematic franchise which managed to pick exactly the right villain(s) in all their installments so far were the three Tom Holland Spider-Man movies. Spoilers for same ensue. ) Both Black Panther movies have done well, too, though I'm a bit atypical for the general audience in that I actually prefer Namor in the second to Killmonger in the first. Either way, though, both antagonists were given interesting backstories and (some) good arguments while also showing themselves so callous that it was clear why they were the antagonists and not the heroes. Both had a certain degree of mirroring and contrasting/paralleling with the heroes going on.

Now, in a big ensemble movie - i.e. the Avengers movies - it's harder to do that, because you don't have a single protagonist. Still, I will say Thanos worked for me to the degree he did (again, ymmv) because of Nebula and Gamora and the backstory built up in the Guardians of the Galaxy movies that came home to roost in both Infinity War and End Game. What I saw of Kang in both Loki the show and Quantummania made me suspect they were going for something similar - but without the crucial Nebula and Gamora element. And a super powerful antagonist by themselves doesn't have the same emotional hook. I mean, Quantummania tried to make it personal by giving Kang backstory with Jan, but... nah, didn't work for me. And honestly, I was almost dreading more endless action sequences focused on various versions of Kang when I didn't care about any that I'd seen so far.

Doom, otoh, has the comicverse intimate connection required (with Reed Richards), a tragic backstory (even a lay person such as myself who mainly knows of Doom via a very memorable version played at [community profile] theatrical_muse where I was decades ago is aware), the "what if?" factor with not just Richards but also Tony Stark (didn't they have to team up in some comics issues as well?), and a larger than life personality. So far, so good: introducing Doom to the MCU and making him a main antagonist instead of Kang isn't a bad idea, though it would have made more sense introducing a new version of the Fantastic Four first, surely.

However: casting RDJ as Doom not only smacks of desperation but on a symbolic level is the exact opposite of what Marvel did when casting RDJ as Tony Stark for the first Iron Man movie all those years ago, and that's depressing. Because back then, it was a decision that showed a willingness to risk and be creative on so many levels. Iron Man wasn't a Marvel character well known outside of comics circles, and in fact, his popularity in said circles, such as it was, had just tanked because of the Civil War storyline, which was really really recent back then. And RDJ had started to rebuild his reputation as an actor, but he still was known as the guy very publicly an addict who'd fallen of the wagon twice before and was not even insurable. Making him the lead in a movie that was anything but a guaranteed money maker, wasn't even guaranteed to bring back production costs, was an incredible gamble.

Whereas now, he's one of the world's most popular actors, an almost guaranteed money maker, and casting him isn't just a shameless nostalgia ploy for disaffected MCU watchers but the least inventive and courageous casting decision they would have made. It's not that I think he'll be bad in the part, absolutely not. But casting him shows TPTB want to play it safe instead of going for interesting and challenging options. Many of the most memorable characters were created by actors who weren't, at that point, beloved stars (including of course MCU Tony Stark). Think Bryan Cranston spending decades as a character actor, which included a memorable creepy one episode guest spot in one X-Files episode and a longer term gig in comedy in Malcolm in the Middle, in between paying the bills via not memorable guest appearances like playing a Ranger in s4 of Babylon 5, before Vince Gilligan cast him as Walter White in Breaking Bad. I don't mean that the MCU should have cast an acting newbie in a multi million movie - they absolutely should have cast someone with experience. But without super stardom, never mind specifically super stardom reached within the MMCU. There are any number of talented and experienced actors who'd be bound to enjoy themselves and doing their all playing a Marvel supervillain - not choosing one of them is a pity.

(BTW, none of this means I think the MCU in totem has run its course. If anything, Jac Schaeffer's latest outing was another case in point that if you give someone the chance to go creative within a corner of it, they can deliver something amazing.)


The other days
selenak: (Default)
2024-12-28 03:35 pm

Yuletide Recs (I)

A first few Yuletide recs:


Agatha All Along:

Smart and Powerful: in which Jen encounters Agatha for the first time in the early 20th century. Banter, UST and foiled murderous intentions ensue.


Dune:

Adam's Rib: in which Irulan attempts to interview Paul for her histories between Dune and Dune Messiah. (It works for the Villeneuve movies as well until we get the third one, at least.) Very plausible take on these two and what they do and don't share, having grown up as the first born of great houses with Bene Gesserit training.


The Godfather:

Valediction: Tom Hagen and Connie Corleone after Sonny's death.


Macbeth:

The Future in the Instant: Lady Macbeth makes a choice, which involves talking to her husband at a key point of the narrative.


North and South:

Plum Pudding & Clustered Grapes: Margeret wants to host a Christmas dinner for the workers. No one else thinks this is a good idea...


The Odyssey:

The Hekubiad: In which Hecuba did make it to Ithaka post Troy, and provides us with her own pov on ensuing events.

Roma Sub Rosa Series - Steven Saylor

Sub Rosa: Saylor's take on Lucius Sergius Catilina was for me one of the most captivating elements of the book series, and this short story captures a lot of why, as we get a glimpse on Catilina and Meto shortly before the final battle.
selenak: (Puppet Angel - Kathyh)
2024-11-12 01:40 pm

Multiverse irritations

Living in the darkest timeline continues to a horrorshow, so, to fannish things.

I would say it's a further sign of getting old, but no, I remember feeling a similar way back in the Torchwood days when the majority of fandom was all over Jack/Ianto and yours truly was monumentally indifferent to that pairing. But: right now, I having this sense of disconnect and/or deja vue when looking for fanfic in various fandoms:

Interview with the Vampire (TV): Look, I loved what the show did with Daniel Molloy! Snarky, rude-to-vampires old Daniel Molloy is my favourite! Whereas I was never much interested in young book!Daniel, his vampire fannishness, or his relationship with book!Armand. What is the fandom writing? Essentially book or book osmosis (the book question being not Interview with the Vampire, but The Queen of the Damned, specifically the chapter The Devil's Minion which in bookverse for the first time reveals what became of "the boy" from the first novel) fanfic, which ill fits the showverse characters, usually starring Young!Daniel from the 1970s. Don't get me wrong, (I thought the young actor playing Daniel in the flashback episode was terrific and really sold me as a younger version of Eric Bogosian, but it's still the older version I'm interested in.) It's not that I don't see much hostile UST between old Daniel and showverse Armand, but the emphasis is on hostile here, which is very different to the bookverse characters and their relationship, and so whenever I see the "Devil's Minion happened" tag I run. Then I thought, maybe I'll get vintage show!Daniel in stories that don't pair him with Armand, but not much luck so far.


LotR: The Rings of Power: Where the hell is autistic Elrond ("needs a hug") coming from? WHY? (I mean, he along with everyone else needs a hug in the finale, obviously. But look, there's a reason why Durin immediately knows Annatar is a liar when Annatar claims Elrond called him "the wisest of all the dwarves". And did we not notice Elrond's gigantic chip on the shoulder/disappointment venting at Galadriel during the first half of the season via pointed digs? Yes, Elrond can be vey kind (especially if you're, say, Disa), but he's also sharp tongued and definitely knows what he's saying when lashing out. If you want an Elven male woobie, this as in so many other ways is defnitely Celebrimbor's season.

Slighly spoilery remark on how Galadriel is doing in fanfic. )


Agatha All Along: show: delivers a delightfully messed up exes relationship between Agatha Harkness, villainous witch with huuuuuuge body count, and Rio, who is really (spoiler). Manages to flesh out Agatha as a character from her WandaVision introduction without prettifying or ignoring what she did and what she's capable of. Fanfic: here, the warning tags to run away from for me are "soft!Agatha", "soft!Rio", and all variations thereof. Spoilery rant ensues. )

Back to Interview with the Vampire (TV version), some more thoughts unrelated to fanfiction: Unreliable Narrator is a big trope in both seasons, and I'm wondering and look forward to The Vampire Lestat (the novel) getting the same treatment in season 3, since I bet the show won't abandon the "questioning the narrator" gimmick despite the fact none of the later novel has the interview framework anymore. And of course it already used bits and pieces of the later novels in its s1 and 2 adaptations, hinting at what will and won't make the cut. Spoilery thoughts. )
selenak: (Default)
2024-11-08 04:36 pm

Fannish band aid and chicken soup

The week: happened. I'm still ping-ponging between horror, disgust, "rage, rage against the dying of the light" whenever I'm thinking about it, but it's bloody exhausting, and we need to gather emotional strength for what's ahead. So I treasure reminders of humanity in the better sense, of resilience, kindness, compassion, which we're also capable of. Real or fannish. Which is why I offer this tiny package of links:

Lord of the Rings/The Rings of Power:

Rivendell: The survivors of Ost-in-Edhil have found the hidden valley of Imladris. How long can this safety last? A lovely, short and poignant story about Elrond after one cataclysm, not knowing whether the next one is around the corner, doing his best for the survivors and finding it in him to carry on.

Now, one of several reasons why I've enjoyed RoP as much as I did was that Bear McCreary is writing gorgeous music for it. ((And I actually used to skip the songs when reading Tolkien back in my younger days.) Here are some of his most beautiful compositions for the show, Poppy's song This Wandering Day from season 1, and Old Tom Bombadil (lyrics: JRRT), both in the original versions from the show and in the covers by Rachel Hardy.

This Wandering Day (original)

This Wandering Day Cover by Rachel Hardy

Old Tom Bombadil Original

Old Tom Bombadil Cover by Rachel Hardy

(I'm not quoting Gandalf-to-Frodo this time around, I did that already in 2016, but I'm thinking it. I am also thinking of Celebrimbor-to-Galadriel, the one from the finale.)

From Middle Earth to Agatha All Along:


The Ballad of the Witches Road, live performed by the cast at D23. Which I didn't watch pre show as I didn't want to spoil myself, but it's amazing how they are in character in this performance.

Memories that never fade away: post show story with spoilery description. )
selenak: (Werewolf by khall_stuff)
2024-10-31 09:41 am
Entry tags:

Agatha All Along Season Finale

In which the show ends, and I, for one, am amazed how right they did by their titular character.

Seasons of the Witch indeed )
selenak: (Seven)
2024-10-26 02:42 pm
Entry tags:

Thoughts in two universes

Star Trek:Jeri Taylor has died. I associate her mostly with Voyager and Janeway - who was very much her creation -, but she did get her start in TNG and wrote The Drumhead, which to this day remains one of my favourite episodes. (Also a good example of why one episode with this basic premise works and another doesn't, when compared to a season 1 of Battlestar Galactica episode. In both cases, an actual act of sabotage happens and the investigation escalates to a MacCarthy-esque (as we said back in the day; this was before the last two decades, where more modern comparisons would apply) paranoia exercise, with civil liberties being dispensed with left, right and center, until it's the show's leading man on the dock. Here are my two main reasons why Jeri Taylor's version works for me better than Ron Moore's does: 1) in the TNG episode, one of the people on team Dispense with Civil Liberties In This Investigation is Worf, i.e. a sympathetic, heroic regular. Who doesn't snap out of it until late in the game. Whereas the BSG episode has only unsympathetic people on Team Paranoia, and our heroes holding firm. (Well, this is season 1. In later seasons....) Which robs the episode of some of it power and point that The Drumhead makes, i.e. that you can be full of good intentions and in still let your belief in "in times of danger, we have to dispense with the niceties and get our hands dirty for the greater good" drive you to a place where you do something unjustifiable. There is no magic protection against it by virtue of being a good person. The other better writing choice is that the original defendant in The Drumhead is a half Romulan whom the audience doesn't know, whereas as far as I recall, in BSG the ones on the lines are two sympathetic recurring characters. The difference is that Picard and friends have no more idea whether or not the half Romulan is guilty than the audience does. The emotional stakes are simply easier if it's someone we know and like getting accused from the start. So yeah: Jeri Taylor, I loved that episode.

Speaking of female showrunners, here's an interview with WandaVision and Agatha All Along show runner Jac Schaeffer about the latest episode. I rewatched some of WandaVision since we have to wait for another week for the Agatha All Along finale, and I have to say it holds up really well, and my two problems with the finale aren't really that heavy anymore. For external reasons, in a way. Meaning: stuff not in the show itself but what came after. What was most bothering me during my original watch was Monica's line in the finale where she told Wanda spoilery things ) I no longer think that, not least because of spoilery things )

Something else that watching Agatha All Along and WandaVision back to back hammered home to me is that Jac Schaeffer really excells at creating Marvel shows with multiple female roles that simultanously work as acting tour de force showcases. Elizabeth Olsen in none of the MCU movies has the chance to showcase the sheer variety she does in WandaVision, but as much as the show is built around her, it also offer a meaty character driven storyline for Monica Rambeau (who essentially gets (re-)introduced here as an adult character, does a great job with Darcy Lewis (a better one than the later Thor movies, imo) as a supporting character, and of course introduces Agatha as a great new MCU villain. Which isn't to say the male roles are background noise - Paul Bettany as Vision(s) also gets more to do, acting wise, than in any MCU movie save perhaps in his original appearance in Age of Ultron, and my rewatch had me paying more attention to the kids for obvious reasons, so I noticed one scene in particular ) which might have given Ms Schaeffer the idea to Read more... ) Also, the flashback to Agatha and her original coven and mother in Salem was especially interesting to me regarding the question as to whether or not Agatha can control her power when attacked by another witch. And the answer is spoilery. )
selenak: (Vanessa Ives by Sakuraberries)
2024-10-24 07:12 pm
Entry tags:

Agatha All Along 1.07

In which Patti LuPone rocks, and it is understandable that the cast calls this their favourite episode.

I want a Penny Dreadful crossover for all the obvious reasons )
selenak: (Family by Toxic)
2024-10-17 08:09 am
Entry tags:

Agatha All Along 1.06

In which we get the backstory of *redacted*

Spoilers are MCUs very own Dybbuk )
selenak: (Father Issues by Raven_annabella)
2024-10-11 02:31 pm
Entry tags:

Agatha All Along 1.05

In which it turns out the Teen has things in common with Catherine and Frederick the Great.

Spoilers should see someone in a crown )
selenak: (Thorin by Meathiel)
2024-09-20 10:05 am

Lotr: TROP 2.05 + 2.06/ Agatha All Along 1.01 + 1.02

Rings of Power 2.05 and 2.06: In which things go really bad for dwarves and (some) Numenorians, but really well for Sauron.

Spoilers really want to surpass Feanor )

Agatha All Along: Episodes 1.1. and 1.2 A very enjoyable start. Keep it up, Disney, and Secret Invasion might be forgiven.

Spoilers really want to leave Westview )
selenak: (Kitten by Cheesygirl)
2024-06-30 03:43 pm

(no subject)

In addition to being busy, these last few weeks made you basically stare in fear at every bit of news from the European election onwards. And today, it's "how much will France set itself on fire and Europe with it?" day. I suppose there are the British elections to look forward to, which if nothing else will end fourteen years of Tory horror, but there, too, there's the red thread of going after trans people (and their allies) to boggle at. (Speaking of that, it's been so bizarre to watch JKR getting radicalized through the last decade, to the point where now you can bet on every public pronouncement of hers being anti-trans. Never mind her writing, I'm sitting there thinking, woman, you used to care about actual problems, poverty and social equality being very large among them. I mean, I've read your first non-Potter novel, which is very much about that. You were the first millionaire to give so much money to charity to that you downgraded yourself from the billionaire's list. And now you've devolved into a hate spewing caricature? Good grief.)

Anyway, if, like me, you need distraction from said rl misery and a reminder that both people and the world can be lovely, too, but don't have the time for plays/movies right now because Darth Real Life is breathing down your neck on a personal level, too, why not check out travel vids on YouTube? In recent weeks, I've become quite attached to The Adventures of A plus K, featuring a young American couple travelling not solely in the US but all over the world with a wonderful amount of enthusiasm (for sights and food alike) and guts (see: their adventures in Finland). Originally an algorithm brought them to my attention because of their Munich vids, but soon I was going through their Scandianvian adventures and US National parks back log.

Because it's often instructive to check out how other people see you and what you're used to, I also find vids by non-Germans living in Germany interesting, like Type Ashton, with her counterpart, a German vidder living in the US, being Feli from Germany.

And lastly, if you do need something fictional but aren't up for new stuff because of the above mentioned business: there's the rewatch option of things where because you know them already it's okay to fast foreward in some places or rewatch favourite scenes. I've reminded myself that while I never got what the big deal with Oscar Isaacs was in the SW Sequels, I completely get it in Moon Knight, which I feel fell a bit under the radar because it's one of several Marvel Disney series Disney pumped out in recent years. He's great in the, hm, two leading roles, to put it as unspoiliery as possible, May Calamawy is absolutely fantastic as Layla El-Faouly, and while I haven't read the comics, what the show does with Egyptian mythology is actually way better than what Marvel did with Norse mythology. (Extra points for using Taweret instead of Isis. No offense to Isis, but there are other goddesses in the Egyptian pantheon!)

Thus fortified with the occasional distraction, I get get to work. And will try to not check the news too often for French election results tonight...

P.S. David Tennant icon courtesy of the fact that apparently Sunak's latest pre election PR masterpiece is going after him?
selenak: (Holmes and Watson by Emme86)
2024-05-12 06:40 pm

Multifandom: Unsent Letters 2024

This year's Unsent Letters ficathon has gone live. I couldn't participate, but I've been enjoying reading through the collection. Here are some favourites, and you'll notice it was a year of crossovers:


Buffy/Highlander: Watchers : in ye olde days of my early fandoms, decades ago, I remember there were quite a few crossovers between Highlander: The Series and Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and not just because of the fact both shows feature a secret organisation called "The Watchers" monitoring the supernatural folk of which the titular hero(ine) is a part, so finding this made me feel all nostalgic. It's a good take on the trope in its own right, with perfect Giles and Joe Dawson voices. Very enjoyable.


Elementary/Doctor Strange (MCU): A Strange Correspondence . In which it turns out Joan Watson and Stephen Strange spent a few years in med school together, and they're living in the same city, so when he needs a good detective, he knows whom to ask. It wasn't until I actually finished the story that I recalled the "Cumberbatch and Miller both played Sherlock Holmes in a modern adaptation at the same time" factor, and it's because this story isn't about that, there's no winking at the audience because of the casting. Instead, we get what feels to me a very ic series of exchanges in various media between Strange and Joan, and Strange and Sherlock, and I smiled and wonder whether I will ever have the time for an Elementary rewatch because it was a show with such lovely character work, and I'm still deeply fond of it. Darth Real Life being hot on my heels, it might be a good long while, but in the meantime, there's good fanfic like this.

Doctor Who: Until I see you again: in which Jo Grant, living her best life, writes to the Doctor, every now and then, through the decades, and the author captures her voice both from her original appearances and that of older Jo as seen in The Sarah Jane Adventures perfectly. I also loved the choice of Doctor who finally gets the letters and writes back.

Jane Eyre: Letters and Articles: which to me felt like a Wilkie Collins take on a Charlotte Bronte novel - the story does a great job both with the letters Jane writers to her former teacher Miss Temple, and with the various articles and their officious Victorian tone. I felt charmed, and also now curious about Miss Temple's post Lowood life in a way I never was before.
selenak: (Hyperion by son_of)
2023-11-10 06:21 pm
Entry tags:

The Marvels (Film review)

Remember the first, hugely enjoyable and silly trailer being followed by increasingly more serious-toned trailers, as if TPTB were spooked by a certain type of fannish reaction? Well, the first trailer is the one representative of the movie - it's fluffy and silly, and for the most part, I enjoyed it. Unfortunately, I can't say it's really good. Among other things, it got me to musing how tricky it is to do comedy while also not underselling emotional reactions to (past and present) actually tragic goings-on. This is why the later two Thor movies don't work for me - and I know I'm in a minority here re: Ragnarök, if not Love and Thunder, which got me thinking: why MCU movie does get that balance right in my highly subjective opinion? I don't mean "uses comedy moments in between drama", I mean "wants to do a comedy, successfully does a comedy, but also wants to sell the characters' emotional spectrum as not limited to farce and give them a reaction that feels emotionally plausible and real despite the comedy plot? And the winner is, drumroll... the first Ant-Man movie. Also the second, mostly, but the first one is really the best in this regard. It's absolutely a light hearted comedy, but it doesn't undersell the dysfunctional father-daughter relationship between Hank and Hope, or the missing of Janet, Scott's love for his daughter as his primary motivation and his very functional relationship with her (and his ex, and her current guy) as contrast also works very well, and the plot isn't anything universe saving, it's quintessentially a heist movie, ideally suited to the comedy format and stakes. And there you have one (not the only one, but one) reason why The Marvels doesn't succeed the same way - it shoots itself in the foot by letting the stakes be cosmic, but due to the way the film embraces the silly, pushed to the max by the flerkin (who were adorable, don't get me wrong!), it's hard to feel a moment of tension. Granted, due to Carol's power level, I guess heist movies and their equivalents are out of the question, given that you need an opponent who is able to challenge her, but still, I think the writing team could have found a twist.

Now, I thoroughly enjoyed seeing Kamala Khan again, who is still ridiculously charming, as is her family. She's who holds the movie together, in as much as anyone does. Kamala's emotional reactions throughout feel real, and I have no complaints about anything she says or does or how her character is handled. The fannish glee, the initial panic in outrageous situations , the courage, the wish to save everyone meeting the reality - it's all great. Also, the actress is wonderfully expressive in her face (case in question, the hug scene, and I shall say no more - it's hilarious while also genuine all to her acting). Monica Rambeau was also good, but here we get into the difference to the first Ant-Man movie (or, come to think of it, how the Guardians movie handle Nebula and Gamora, as well as Rocket) again, because one of the two angst threads amidst all the comedy is Monica having issues with Carol's decades long absence. And it felt to me as if the movie went out of its way to make to assure the audience that this doesn't come across as actually hurtful, that our heroines aren't really mad at each other. (Hope in Ant-Man the first? Was mad at Hank. Really, truly, deeply. And you felt it. As you did that Hank did love his daughter but was spectacularly bad at demonstrating this. Lucky them for meeting Scott, who has his own problems but never that one.) Because I didn't feel the build up, the resolution between Monica and Carol felt equally flat to me.

The other angst thread in the middle of the comedy plot concerns the Kree. Spoilers think this entire plot thread would have really worked in a serious movie taking the time and trouble to flesh it out, but not in a comedy. )

I also wonder about Brie Larson's acting abilities in this regard, frankly. Might be unfair, but take another young action heroine who is supposed to be outwardly stoic (unless she has a complete and understandable breakdown) most of the time but with a lot going on inside, to wit, Katniss in the Hunger Games movies. Jennifer Lawrence can convey that (imo as always). Brie Larson - not really. The most memorable Carol scene in this film aren't her scenes with Monica or the Maria flashback or the grand climax, but the hilarious Bollywood planet sequence, where she shows a neat talent for physical comedy.

Oh, and don't even try to wonder how and where the movie fits in continuity wise re: Secret Invasion: A Terrible Series. Skrull spoilers! )

All these complaints not withstanding, I actually did have a good time. I was in a mood to embrace the silly right along the movie, the three way trading places gimmick between our heroines was used to great and amusing effect, plus it gave them a good rationale for having to team up and remain in close physical proximity with each other (Carol can't fight the movie's Big Bad if she keeps getting transported to New Jersey, after all). Planet Bollywood was great, and much as the movie's occasional attempts at seriousness didn't really work for me, I appreciate the villain having a motivation that makes sense and wasn't just "I want to rule/destroy the galaxy". Also, of course, three female leads on the heroic and a woman on the villain side = neat! I just wish this happened in a better movie I'd have the urge to rewatch, but you now, there's always the Ms Marvel tv series if I want to watch Kamala in something more memorable. As for Monica, that tag scene! Spoilers admit to little yelpd. )

Lastly, note to whoever scored the movie, though, why Memory instead of Macavity or Jellicle Cats?