Entry tags:
Pirates!
Second entry of the day, because now, post-Bayreuth, I FINALLY managed to see the second Pirates movie. And now having checked some other reactions, I guess I have another case of having fallen for the least popular character in the fandom. Because guess whom I adored in this one, having liked her already in Curse of the Black Pearl? That's right. Elizabeth.
When she chained Jack up to leave him for the kraken, she joined my pantheon containing the likes of Emma Frost, Irina Derevko, Winn Adami, Laura Roslin and other smart manipulative, ruthless women who are completely capable of behaving dastardly in order to get what they want. This, btw, does not mean I approve of each of their actions, or don't feel sorry for those on the other other hand of the dastardly treatment. (Says she who loves the likes of Arvin Sloane and Londo Mollari as well.) In this particular case, I must admit to a certain gleefulness, though, because a certain type of male character preaching to a female character of how she needs to be honest and show the rogue within (say, Rhett Butler) just makes me want to slap him in the face with the result, because usually said character then expects the female to be ruthless with everyone else, just not him. Anyway, Dead Man's Chest is generally a darker film - in an early scene of the first movie, we see a few skeletons swinging in the wind, in the the second, we get men's eyes picked out in those cages, and that pretty much sets the tone. I remember debates on the first film wanting to have its cake and eat it by presenting nice pirates (Jack) and bad pirates (Barbossa & crew). Here, what with cut throats left and right and Jack being willing to trade both Will and 99 other men for his own freedom for quite a while, that's not an issue.
That's another thing I loved: call it the undermining of the Jack Sparrow, lovable rogue image. One of the reasons why Han Solo over at Star Wars pretty much left me cold is that he was pretty much the cynic with a heart of gold, the kind of "ambiguous" character it's safe to love because he never does anything truly nasty, we know he'd never really abandon his friends, and most importantly, we never see any victims of supposed ruthless decisions he made in the past. Here, both Jack and Elizabeth are shown as ambiguous in a way that doesn't give such a safe "out". Jack does leave Will to Davy Jones, and the other (short lived) survivors have faces, too. Elizabeth gets Will, the crew of the Black Pearl and herself safely on shore not by risking/sacrificing the life of random redshirt X, she does it by tricking and sacrificing the universally beloved Jack Sparrow. Even bit players like what-was-their-name-again, the clownish duo, have their moment of darkness, the brief scene where Elizabeth is unarmed and they're alone with her. And you remember they are pirates, professional cutthroats and yes, probably rapists, too.
On a more shallow note, someone must have noticed in the first movie that Keira Knighley looked great in male seaman's get up during that short sequence she wore it on Norrington's ship, and put it to good use by letting her wear said wardrobe for most of the movie. As opposed to many an actress, she looked androgynous enough in it to make the get up convincing.
Speaking of looks, Jack Davenport pulls off the scruffy one for Norrington smolderingly. The good Commodore had his fans already after movie one, being one avoided cliché - i.e. instead of the stuffy evil fiancé, he was the decent honorable fiancé - but now I'd be surprised if there wasn a middle season 3 (of Angel) Wesley Wyndham-Pryce effect. It's funny, DMC seems to have resulted in an explosion of Jack/Elizabeth fic for obvious reasons (though in reviews Elizabeth still seems to fare worst in terms of condemnation), but what I really want to read is Elizabeth 'n James. Their brief scenes were fascinating to me, and I loved both that she stopped him from taking on the tavern drunk by knocking him out and that she went after him later to collect him from mud. I want a missing scene ficlet for what happens after her "James Norrington, what has life done to you" and before she shows up with him in tow at the Black Pearl. Conversely, their scene with Norrington making his pointed remark about just how Will ended up on Davy Jones' ship was fab, displaying James N. in his intelligence and newfound level when interacting with Elizabeth (they couldn't be further from the couple at Port Royal just before she fell in the sea). One more thing about Norrington: having outsmarted Jack, I fully expect him to deal with East India Company Guy next, possibly in collusion with (Ex-)Governer Swann, who was great in this movie, too.
The downside of things? Well, like virtually everyone else has said, the cannibals' island sequence was completely superfluous. I take it they also caused a debate about racism. What it did remind me of was of course the Ewoks sequence in RotJ, but Ewoks don't have a history of slavery going on at exactly the same time this movie is supposedly set.
(Star Wars homages galore in this movie; aside from the obvious Jack-with-kraken/Han-in-carbonite, we have Bootstrap Bill Turner as a milder version of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader (does that make Davy Jones Palpatine?), and hey, a female Yoda in the swamp.)
Also, a lot of set-ups, as is a film's wont if the makes know there'll be a sequel, for which we have to wait regarding the pay-off; the whole story of Davy Jones' getting his heart broken by a woman, obviously. (My bet is on Yoda, err, Tia Dalmas.) Also the letters that were in the chest; Elizabeth read one quickly while the boys were arguing, and I wonder whether she'll have learned something that will come in handy when dealing with Jones. And of course: Barbossa. Able to eat apples, so presumably not around by virtue of having become undead again.
All in all, I enjoyed watching it, and am looking forward to the next one.
When she chained Jack up to leave him for the kraken, she joined my pantheon containing the likes of Emma Frost, Irina Derevko, Winn Adami, Laura Roslin and other smart manipulative, ruthless women who are completely capable of behaving dastardly in order to get what they want. This, btw, does not mean I approve of each of their actions, or don't feel sorry for those on the other other hand of the dastardly treatment. (Says she who loves the likes of Arvin Sloane and Londo Mollari as well.) In this particular case, I must admit to a certain gleefulness, though, because a certain type of male character preaching to a female character of how she needs to be honest and show the rogue within (say, Rhett Butler) just makes me want to slap him in the face with the result, because usually said character then expects the female to be ruthless with everyone else, just not him. Anyway, Dead Man's Chest is generally a darker film - in an early scene of the first movie, we see a few skeletons swinging in the wind, in the the second, we get men's eyes picked out in those cages, and that pretty much sets the tone. I remember debates on the first film wanting to have its cake and eat it by presenting nice pirates (Jack) and bad pirates (Barbossa & crew). Here, what with cut throats left and right and Jack being willing to trade both Will and 99 other men for his own freedom for quite a while, that's not an issue.
That's another thing I loved: call it the undermining of the Jack Sparrow, lovable rogue image. One of the reasons why Han Solo over at Star Wars pretty much left me cold is that he was pretty much the cynic with a heart of gold, the kind of "ambiguous" character it's safe to love because he never does anything truly nasty, we know he'd never really abandon his friends, and most importantly, we never see any victims of supposed ruthless decisions he made in the past. Here, both Jack and Elizabeth are shown as ambiguous in a way that doesn't give such a safe "out". Jack does leave Will to Davy Jones, and the other (short lived) survivors have faces, too. Elizabeth gets Will, the crew of the Black Pearl and herself safely on shore not by risking/sacrificing the life of random redshirt X, she does it by tricking and sacrificing the universally beloved Jack Sparrow. Even bit players like what-was-their-name-again, the clownish duo, have their moment of darkness, the brief scene where Elizabeth is unarmed and they're alone with her. And you remember they are pirates, professional cutthroats and yes, probably rapists, too.
On a more shallow note, someone must have noticed in the first movie that Keira Knighley looked great in male seaman's get up during that short sequence she wore it on Norrington's ship, and put it to good use by letting her wear said wardrobe for most of the movie. As opposed to many an actress, she looked androgynous enough in it to make the get up convincing.
Speaking of looks, Jack Davenport pulls off the scruffy one for Norrington smolderingly. The good Commodore had his fans already after movie one, being one avoided cliché - i.e. instead of the stuffy evil fiancé, he was the decent honorable fiancé - but now I'd be surprised if there wasn a middle season 3 (of Angel) Wesley Wyndham-Pryce effect. It's funny, DMC seems to have resulted in an explosion of Jack/Elizabeth fic for obvious reasons (though in reviews Elizabeth still seems to fare worst in terms of condemnation), but what I really want to read is Elizabeth 'n James. Their brief scenes were fascinating to me, and I loved both that she stopped him from taking on the tavern drunk by knocking him out and that she went after him later to collect him from mud. I want a missing scene ficlet for what happens after her "James Norrington, what has life done to you" and before she shows up with him in tow at the Black Pearl. Conversely, their scene with Norrington making his pointed remark about just how Will ended up on Davy Jones' ship was fab, displaying James N. in his intelligence and newfound level when interacting with Elizabeth (they couldn't be further from the couple at Port Royal just before she fell in the sea). One more thing about Norrington: having outsmarted Jack, I fully expect him to deal with East India Company Guy next, possibly in collusion with (Ex-)Governer Swann, who was great in this movie, too.
The downside of things? Well, like virtually everyone else has said, the cannibals' island sequence was completely superfluous. I take it they also caused a debate about racism. What it did remind me of was of course the Ewoks sequence in RotJ, but Ewoks don't have a history of slavery going on at exactly the same time this movie is supposedly set.
(Star Wars homages galore in this movie; aside from the obvious Jack-with-kraken/Han-in-carbonite, we have Bootstrap Bill Turner as a milder version of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader (does that make Davy Jones Palpatine?), and hey, a female Yoda in the swamp.)
Also, a lot of set-ups, as is a film's wont if the makes know there'll be a sequel, for which we have to wait regarding the pay-off; the whole story of Davy Jones' getting his heart broken by a woman, obviously. (My bet is on Yoda, err, Tia Dalmas.) Also the letters that were in the chest; Elizabeth read one quickly while the boys were arguing, and I wonder whether she'll have learned something that will come in handy when dealing with Jones. And of course: Barbossa. Able to eat apples, so presumably not around by virtue of having become undead again.
All in all, I enjoyed watching it, and am looking forward to the next one.
no subject
I think it was a darker movie, in which no one behaves very well (with the exception of Will, most of the time), and I think one of the challenges for these characters in the third movie will be to find their way to some kind of mutual trust. It's all so interesting. *is in the throes of fannish infatuation*
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Regarding Elizabeth: I agree. She has become a fascinating character. She's manipulative - but so is Jack and on a much larger scale, too. My take on that final scene between her and Jack was that she does it in order to protect Will/get revenge for the dangers Jack put Will through.
What I love about both POTC movies is that all characters are drawn very well and refuse to be pressed into neat little boxes. Everyone can be both honorable and manipulative, generous and self-serving. The most honest character this time around is Will who most of the times announces what he wants to do, but of course has to become a thief in order to protect Elizabeth.
Love (!!!) the character development for all the main characters.
POTC is one of the movies where I can imagine the four main characters Jack, Will, Elizabeth and Norrington in every possible combination of pairings including OT3s and OT4.
To me Elizabeth/Jack feels too much like brother/sister after POTC II for me though. (If they were vampires, I'd love to see them paired off, of course. ;-)) Elizabeth/Norrington would be interesting, too. After all, Norrington suddenly isn't Mr Starched and Perfect any longer, but should fit the piratey vision Elizabeth always wanted as a husband. :-) My favorite pairing will always be "I knew you'd warm up to me, mate."-Sparrington. :-)
Word about the Star Wars parallels. Had to think about Vader and Luke during the Bootstrap and Will scenes. Davy Jones is more Phantom of the Opera than Palpatine, though. Unlike Cutler Beckett, Davy Jones might get a chance at redemption.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I just had to run write Elizabeth. And Jack. Because damn I love predatory pairings! It punches all my little buttons that way -- outsider outlaw who's not so sweet, 18th century girl in boy's clothes, and FREEDOM! Not to mention enough queer subtest to sink a ship, androgyny and genderfuck all over the place, and battles between tall ships. I've been writing like a mad thing in this fandom for two weeks and just started a long story about Tia Dalma and New Orleans.
Oh come with me on this trip, Evil Twin! We haven't shared a fandom since X Men! (unless you count Napoleon as a fandom, which seems a stretch....) *bounces in a general north-easterly direction*
And yes, Star Wars all over the place!!!!!
no subject
I, too, was vexed by the hypocrisy of most fans condemning Elizabeth for ruthlessness and then praising Jack for the same. Often seems the fate of female characters in fandom, though.
Did you want me to dig out some fic recs?
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
Kickass Elizabeth recs
No Survivors
http://monimala.livejournal.com/215092.html
Burning for a Cause
http://monimala.livejournal.com/222427.html
For the Wicked
These are three very interesting Elizabeth ones that I thought you would particularly like.
You know, I think Elizabeth is very hot. I'm kind of crushing on her. She is so not my pov character, though. Jack is. Which I'm sure says some pretty strange things about my head.
Re: Kickass Elizabeth recs
Re: Kickass Elizabeth recs
Re: Kickass Elizabeth recs
Re: Kickass Elizabeth recs
Re: Kickass Elizabeth recs
Re: Kickass Elizabeth recs
Re: Kickass Elizabeth recs
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
On ruthlessness, it's definitely less shocking if you've seen the DVD deleted scenes for the first film that include all of Elisabeth's moral ambiguity that got cut out. But I'm sure I saw someone insisting that Jack was just stalling with the "souls of a hundred men" thing and would never really go through with it.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
There's a great essay about her character here (http://monimala.livejournal.com/212515.html).
Her incredible swordfighting skillz were a bit much, though, since it seems she wouldn't have had that much time to practice.
I was just looking at the IMDb to try to see if they said how much time passes between the 1st and 2nd movie, and found this in the trivia section:
"While the script for the second movie was being written, Keira Knightly suggested the scene between Jack and Elizabeth where Jack is handcuffed to the ship."
Keira Knightley, you rule.
(no subject)
no subject
I bet Rygel and Davy Jones would have a ball bluffing and snarking at each other. Plus, Rygel wouldn't drown if made to walk the plank.
(no subject)
I really like your Elizabeth icon
There is just so much ground to cover for the third movie, besides what they're going to do with the betrayals, and non-dead Barbossa, and if Will will free Bootstrap from the curse and if there is going to be a horizon for him and Elizabeth, and of course Davy Jones and Beckett - that I worry that they're going to spend a little too much time on the slapstick repetition and not enough on actual plot.
But I've been pleasantly surprised by these movies and am hoping for more surprises in the third.
And I have more thoughts, but I have to see the movie again and go to sleep now, so...um, yes.
no subject
This (http://jd-lit.livejournal.com/7865.html) new Norribeth story set during DMC is also well-written.
(no subject)