Crossover of Genius!
Jan. 8th, 2008 07:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
selenakReturning to Munich, I find the most delightful crossover posted. ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
yahtzee63 had the brilliant idea of tackling Gone With The Wind/Dr. Who AND PULLED IT OFF. I'm awed. I also think her take on Scarlett O'Hara is ever so much better and matching the original than any of the published sequels, prequels and whatnots. What's more, she doesn't prettify Scarlett's 19th century attitudes. Her take on Martha and the Doctor is excellent, too, but as this is written in Scarlett's pov, I would really dare Gone With The Wind readers who aren't familiar with Dr. Who, like artaxastra, to read it, because Scarlett doesn't know any more about DW than they do, and finds out all they need to know to get the story. And as I said, this is ever so much better than the mediocre stuff calling itself Rhett Butler's People or Scarlett. Go, read, admire:
The Yankee's Loot
yahtzee63 had the brilliant idea of tackling Gone With The Wind/Dr. Who AND PULLED IT OFF. I'm awed. I also think her take on Scarlett O'Hara is ever so much better and matching the original than any of the published sequels, prequels and whatnots. What's more, she doesn't prettify Scarlett's 19th century attitudes. Her take on Martha and the Doctor is excellent, too, but as this is written in Scarlett's pov, I would really dare Gone With The Wind readers who aren't familiar with Dr. Who, like artaxastra, to read it, because Scarlett doesn't know any more about DW than they do, and finds out all they need to know to get the story. And as I said, this is ever so much better than the mediocre stuff calling itself Rhett Butler's People or Scarlett. Go, read, admire: The Yankee's Loot
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-09 07:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-09 07:18 am (UTC)