Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (Bayeux)
Okay, this is one of the geekiest things I've ever seen, and I love it. Also, am somewhat proud a getting most of the references. Though I have to say having spent the last year listening to the History of Byzantium podcast helped, because the references aren't all anglocentric but really try for European (and part of Asian) history. And everlasting kudos to the lyricist(s) for coming up with this gem: "Few things here to read but the Nibelungenlied"!




Now I want to do a Frederician or 18th Century Enlightenment version, hmm..... When I have time! Whenever that will be! But I want to do it!
selenak: (Demerzel and Terminus)
For All Mankind: Following the reccommendations, I marathoned the first two seasons of For All Mankind, aka what Ron Moore (and friends) did next (after BSG), which is an AU starting from the premise that the Soviets get to the moon first, therefore the Space Race doesn't end, and history starts to alter in small and big ways from therel. (One of the big ways being that as part of catching up with Soviet progressiveness in that regard, women enter the US space programm far earlier.) [personal profile] naraht has said this is also a soap opera, which is true, in a good way; the relationships drama certainly forms a solid part of the narrative, but it's expertly done. (So far.) Non-romantic relationships are treated as important both on a Doylist and Watsonian level, and while space exploration continuing in this AU is clearly a good thing overall, the show doesn't use the premise to solve all the rl problems; as of the second season, which is set in 1983, acceptance of same sex relationships hasn't moved faster than it did in rl, for example.

You can tell that Moore and several of the other scriptwriters cut their teeth in Star Trek long before Danielle quotes the TOS episode A Taste of Armageddon in the s2 finale by despite things getting pretty dark at times, humanity's better instincts prevail. Also by Starfleet NASA, by and large, being an organisation where most people, be they astronauts or engineers, are brave, loyal, and devoted to each other, so you get why people would want to join even beyond the romance of visiting the moon. (Though I have to say, congrats to the GCI department, all those space shots are gorgeous.) When they do fail each other (think Margo re: Aleida in s1), there's usually a good explanation, and also fate gives them another chance. (They get called out on it, though.) And you get all the space tropes - difficult landings, losing contact, being thrown of course, having to do repairs on a moving vehicle, etc. - even the spoilery thing I last saw on The Expanse and before that read in Arthur C. Clarke. One sign of how well the show worked for me: I was never tempted to fast forward through the Earthbound centric episodes but found them just as gripping.

Another thing which impressed me: several examples of the "both sides have a point" trope, viscerally so when Danielle visited her sister-in-law in s2.

Sometimes I wasn't sure whether I read the episode right, but then subsequent events proved the creative time knew what it was doing. For example: Now it gets too spoilery to talk about without a cut. )

Lastly: talking about a non space related change to rl events in this AU: John Lennon survives. This isn't a plot point but something of a recurring gag since he keeps popping up on tv briefly when people switch channels. Apparantly in this AU, John in response to the escalating Cold War gets back into peace activisim and organizes a big concert as part of this. Here my suspension of disbelief broke down, not re: the surival or the return to peace activism but the concert organizing. Look, he'd be terrific at promoting something like that, if properly motivated. But organizational skills and the patience and discipline it takes to get a mega event like that together... nah. Of course, Yoko did and does have organizational skills, but a mega concert in 1983 would have required diplomacy and talking various other superstars with big egos into it and hm, I just don't see her as Bob Geldof, either, is what I'm saying.


I also read Fortune's Favor, the third volume of Jo Graham's ongoing space saga The Calpurnian Wars. Like the previous books, this one introduces us to another of those planets in uncomfortable coexistence with the expansion-hungry Calpurnia (aka, ever more apparant, Space Rome). Speaking of AUs, it strikes me that one way to describe this saga is "the story of the late Roman Republic, but a) from everyone else's pov, and b) everyone else wins". In the last volume, we basically got space!Gaul winning against Caesar, and now it's Space!Egypt's turn, confronted with two of the conspirators (space!Caesar still got assasinated in between books), Cassian and Junia. Cassian is this volume's main antagonist, but as ever in this series, the attraction and narrative interest lies in our heroes and the setting and not in the imperialist menace du jour. In this case, our main character is Caralys, a courtesan, allied to one of the main influential families on Menaechmi. This book is also where characters from the previous volumes start to interact, so Caralys teams up with Bister from Sounding Dark and Boral from War Lady in order to a) rescue her lover's kidnapped son, and b) ensure her world's freedom from blackmail by warlord. It's a very satisfying adventure, and I had a particular soft spot for the subplot involving Caralys' lover and Boral. As for Caralys, impressive as her weaving threads together to get the rescue going is, my favourite scene of hers involves something that I think is incredibly difficult to pull off both on a Doylist and Watsonian level: confront a character who has given our pov every reason to despise them so far when they are down on their luck and react with kindness and insight instead of crushing them. In a way that doesn't come across as naive or doormat-like but as going to the core of the problem in a way that can make an actual change for the better instead of continuing a vicious cycle. Perhaps because of all the rl viciousness right now, I treasure such scenes and characters all the more.

Like the previous books, the novel does tell its own adventure, and you get the necessary information about Bister and Boral in it if you haven't read the two previous ones, but the narrative texture is much richer if you have. I really enjoyed it reading it, and am looking forward to the next story of the saga!

Lastly, a DS9 vid rec: The Wrong Side, a delightful and charming Garak/Bashir vid.
selenak: (Discovery)
After a month where I had to do other things, I went on with my Discovery rewatch, and four episodes into s3 I'm filled with even more love for the show. I think one of many reasons why I adore the later two seasons so much is that for me, they solved a narrative problem even my beloved Babylon 5 struggled with in its fifth season and which the Star Wars sequel trilogy avoided altogether by skipping entirely over the New Republic era and creating another scenario where it's Evil Fascist Bad Guys vs Plucky Resistance Heroes. It is this: making a period of reconstruction, of rebuilding a society after some cataclysmic event narratively compelling and exciting.

War, as Sheridan says in one of JMS's self conscious meta moments in s5, is exciting. Teaming up in war against a mutual (usually evil and overwhelming, in fiction) enemy is a feell good narrative, as is defeating said enemy after some temporary set backs. But rebuilding, making alliances for the long term, making compromises where no one gets exactly what they want, and without a Big Bad to boo and hiss at? I'm a staunch s5 defender, and not just because the network screwed JMS over, but while the Fall of Centauri Prime storyline is perfect, everything else would have needed some retooling, and I don't think he ever solved the problem of how to make Sheridan convincingly a good president (i.e. the dialogue keep insisting he is, and the story keeps showing us he's not) the way he was a good war time leader. As for SW and the sequel trilogy, I do think it was a simple calculation on the part of Disney and J.J. Abrams, especially based on the reception the prequels originally got (with their reputation thankfully now somewhat better, says this prequel fan): what people wanted from SW was Plucky Underdog Rebels vs The Evil Empire, and nothing else. Not the plucky rebels transitioning to being the people in power and trying to rebuild a society. So they recreated that scenario, never mind that it meant Our Heroes lived to see their efforts smashed to pieces. (For all that the Disney tv shows can be very different in qualitiy, I give credit where due to Filon, Favreu & Co. of actually tackling the challenge of showing us the New Republic and trying to create a believeable scenario where we see why it fails. Of course, they live in an era where we see democracies all over the world full of people fannish about strongmen again, so I think the theme resonates. However, given that the sequels already established that the New Republic is basically Weimar, the ending is perordained, so that's not really comparable to the challenge I mean: making rebuliding, and specifically rebuilding a democratic society, narratively compelling WITHOUT resorting to the next war against Evil McEvil on the horizon.

Which is what Star Trek: Discovery does show in its third and fourth season. Not that the series is suddenly without villains, or threats and menaces, but they're of a different type, not Evil Empires. S3 very specifically shows us a society that emerged from the breakdown of a civilisatiion - and one that already showed fractures before the Burn -, and the rebuilding of the Federation, the reforging of connections, the need to establish trust that was lost, or in the case the 10c to understand what at first seems utterly incomprehensible, those are the tasks set to our heroes. And it's captivating and emotionally stirring and compelling to watch. That's what I mean when I say Disco has solved that particular narrative challenge.

Also: I'm not sure whether I recced this before or not, but it bears repeating: this is a beautiful vid capturing what's best about the show so well:



selenak: (LondoGkar)
In a first for me, I just got served a complaint from the A03 that "The Archive Warnings are designed to inform users that they may encounter the following types of content: underage sex, rape/non-consensual sex, graphic violence, and major character death. We have determined that this work contains content that warrants the "Major Character Death" Archive Warning. If you prefer not to specify the nature of your work, you may use "Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings" instead. This warning indicates that you have chosen to opt out of the Archive Warnings system for a particular work, and lets users know to "read at their own risk".

The story in question was a decades old one, Five Things which never happened between Garak and Bashir (Star Trek: DS9), one of my better "Five things...", if I may say so myself. But thinking about it, they're correct, major character death happens in, gulp, not just one of these AUs. Now I'm not writing this to complain - "creator chose not to use archive warning" is an absolutely valid alternative (which I've now taken, because I don't want to warn for major character death in a "Five Things" story, not as a general refusal, just for this type of format) - but because the event reminded me how much fannish culture changed in this regard since I started writing fanfiction. I mean, when I started, there were what in retrospect were ridiculously apologetic warnings - for slash, for example, and yes, I did use them, too, back in the day for the very first slash stories I wrote - but otoh for a bunch of AUs which is what "Five things..." collections of stories were/are, which by definition explore things which never happened in canon, and which each are different from each other, well, it was common more than not that at least one of those things which didn't happen would include death. If I, as a reader, started someone's "Five things..." tale, I would not have been surprised in the slightest to see one of the main characters kick the bucket. (Unless they did in canon, then of course "how x survived" would be the given thing to explore.) Whereas today, evidently one does not expect this - at least not at the AO3 - if either the "Major Character Death" or the "Creator chooses not to use archive warning" are not employed. Okay. Noted.

Moving on to my other beloved space station, [personal profile] andraste has remastered and uploaded her wonderful Babylon 5 vid Brothers in Arms. (With the "Creator chooses not to use archive warnings" tag, because Andraste is smarter than me.) I love it as much as ever, and so will you, if you haven't seen it yet. (If you have, go rewatch! It's gorgeous.)


Brothers In Arms (148 words) by Andraste
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: Babylon 5 (TV 1993)
Rating: Teen And Up Audiences
Warnings: Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings
Characters: John Sheridan, Delenn (Babylon 5), Susan Ivanova, Michael Garibaldi, Stephen Franklin, Jeffrey Sinclair, Londo Mollari, G'Kar (Babylon 5), Lennier (Babylon 5), Vir Cotto, Talia Winters, Lyta Alexander
Additional Tags: Fanvids, Embedded Video, Download Available
Summary:

"It's written in the starlight, and every line in your palm." A Babylon 5 fanvid.

selenak: (Darla by Kathyh)
Watched the second season of Bridgerton, which was frothy fun. Of all the (gazillion) things to snap me out of its cheerfully anachronistic universe, though, was various characters going "ugth, but we can't, he's our cousin!" at the prospect of a fourth degree cousin as a potential match. (And no, they didn't grow up with him, none of them had met him before, so there was no closer relation by raising.) Leaving side even the "first cousins = incest" thing is a distinctly modern equation, fourth degree? That feels as likely as the Bennet sisters objecting to Mr. Collins not because of his, well, Mr. Collins-ness, but because he's their cousin. And in the British aristocracy of any fictional or real incarnation, it's probably harder to find someone you don't share at least some ancestors with.

((I mean, I laughed at myself for minding, because Bridgerton never claims to be anything but what it is, but the "4th degree cousin, ew!" thing did what all the string arrangements of Material Girl could not.)

Have some multifandom links:

Interesting discussion of the Spielberg take on WEST SIDE STORY; some arguments I agree with, others I don't, but it's definitely worth reading.

Fire in the front yard: short but to the point take on an AU where Darla got cursed with a soul and Angelus is the one who dies seven episodes into s1 of BTVS; specifically, what then happens in Innocence?

Song of Women: a lovely vid focused on Börte, Genghis Khan's first wife, and her relationship with him, using footage from the 2008 movie "Mongol".
selenak: (Gentlemen of the Theatre by Kathyh)
James MacAvoy interview, apropos his playing the title role in Rostand's Cyrano de Bergerac (which appearantly leans into homerotic subtext for Cyrano/Christian), which contains this gem:

I once sat with Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen and both of them had a ‘Macbeth-off’ where they started speaking Macbeth to each other. I had just finished doing Macbeth and I swear I could not remember a syllable, man. It was awful.”

Now we know how everyone entertained themselves when shooting Days of Fuiture Past. I wish there was a recording!


Farscape:

Deep is a John/Scorpius vid which is already a few years old but which I've only seen today, so I am newly enthused about its fabulousness!

Lastly, [profile] liraen, get this: according to this article in the SZ, the fantastic Dürer exhibition from Aachen moved on to London - only for the National Gallery to exchange two thirds of the exhibited content and completely change the focus from Dürer in the Netherlands to Dürer in Italy, then be surprised when as opposed to the very popular and successful Aix-La-Chapelle original, the result flopped. Boo. Hiss.
selenak: (Discovery)
I’ve been meaning to post these two links for ages, but this week and the next are terribly crowded for me.

Star Trek: Discovery : Level Up : wonderful vid capturing all the joy and love this show offers in three seasons. Definitely the one to show to people who didn’t watch more than first few episodes and keep calling the series “grimdark” when it really isn’t.

Renaissance History : The Body Politic (School Days) : a day in the life of teenage Cesare Borgia, studying at Pisa with the likes of Giovanni de’ Medici, Alessandro Farnese and, of course, his future henchman-in-chief Micheletto. (Not based on either of the Borgia tv shows.)

Also, I’ve been watching Midnight Mass at Netflix. I’d liked Mike Flanagan’s The Haunting of Hill House (except for the ending), and been mildly interested but in the end not really touched by his take on The Turn of the Screw, aka The Haunting of Bly Manor. Midnight Mass, by contrast, isn’t inspired by literary origins, though some characters do feel as if they could be from a Stephen King novel. (Bev in particular, though in a different way Riley, too.) Here, I was captured from the get go and thought the story had the right (for it) ending. All the characters of its ensemble come alive, and the self indulgent parts - my lord, does Mike Flanagan love his monologues! - don’t detract, they somehow fit with the people who say them.

(Not solely the priest who has a professional excuse to monologue.)

What’s most appealing, though, is that Flanagan uses his basic premise - using the similarities between the vampire myth and the Catholic mass if you take it literally - for more than a gimmick, and while the series certainly offers its share of meta and Watsonian critique on religion, it doesn’t do so via cheap shots, but shows the good side of faith as well. You have characters who exploit it, and you have characters who draw their strength from it. The small community on an island where the story is set feels real. (With the one caveat that clearly this entire series takes place in a universe where no vampire novel was ever written, or if written then never filmed, and vampires don’t exist in pop culture.). The way relationships between the characters are complicated and often intense provided emotional hooks for me to follow the story. Lastl, I admired that Flanagan had the guts to put his big horror/action climax two episodes before the ending, and devoted the last two episodes to the fallout. The emotional consequences for everyone. It’s the kind of thing often missing when something as momentous as what happenes in said episode does. There is also the very humane conviction at play that as a human being, you do not lose your capacity to regret and to act on it, even if you have done terrible things. Doesn’t mean everyone use it it (as opposed to clinging to self justification or denial). But in this series, a surprising number of characters do.
selenak: (Wilhelmine und Folichon)
Just found this, had to share: Sanjeev Bhaskar's hilarious rendition of Napoleon Bonaparte's slightly overwrought letters to his wife Joséphine (played by Miriam Margolyes). "Peace with Rome has just been signed. Not a word from you!!!" Miriam Margolyes gives an acting class with her facial reactions to it all.


selenak: (LondoDelenn - Sabine)
Quickly: watched The Old Guard, which appealed to my inner Highlander (the series, not the movies) fan, have noted the existence of comics it's based on for the mythic future era when I have more time. There's distinct crossover potential, though the two types of immortality do not exactly align. And go, movie, for all the queer canon-ness. (Canocity?)

Also, have two links:

Babylon 5

Roar Unheard and Curling Crest Unseen: lovey, quiet vignette about Delenn and Sinclair in seaosn 1.


Stephen King

Paperback Writer: in which not all but a lot of those writers in movies based on Stephen King novels are (hilariously) vidded to the Beatles tune I can't believe I didn't see was perfect for Stephen King. Now, King famously stated in On Writing: "“I was the guy who had written The Shining without even realizing that I was writing about myself", and Jack Torrance is but one of several sometimes extremely dark and sometimes extremely goofy writerly alter egos. The vid puts it together splendidly.
selenak: (Charlotte Ritter)
I've written my [community profile] startrekholidays story and sent it off to be beta'd, as well as embarked on writing my Yuletide assignment. In betwee, there's RL business, but I do fifind the tiime for readiing the occasional article, such as a this one:


Emil's Berlin in translation: about the various English versions of "Emil and the Detectives" by Erich Kästner, and how each of them dealt - or failed to - meet the central challenge: How can you translate a book so closely connected to a particular time and place? How do you let young English readers understand Emil’s world without losing the specificity that is part of the original’s charm? (Was simultanously amused and appalled to find out the Berlin kids get a class upgrade in the English version smply by being given some type of Enid Blyton-esque public school slang to speak, which, err, is not what I'd have chosen as the British equivalent for Berlin working class kids...)

On another note, have a Lawrence of Arabia vid rec:

[VID] Garlands (17 words) by caramarie
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: Lawrence of Arabia (1962)
Rating: Teen And Up Audiences
Warnings: Graphic Depictions Of Violence
Relationships: Ali ibn el Kharish & T. E. Lawrence
Characters: Ali ibn el Kharish, T. E. Lawrence
Summary:

‘I pray that I may never see the desert again.’



Heartbreaking Lawrence/Ali relationship and character study.
selenak: (Ben by Idrilelendil)
Day 29 ~ Link to a fanvid you like.

My pleasure. This vid sums up Lorenzo de' Medici's second season arc beautifully, if spoilery for the entire show:



(Incidentally, what is it with most vids these days using dialogue? I remember when that was a strict no in vids. I'm still often not keen on it, but for this vid it works.)


The other days )
selenak: (Servalan by Snowgrouse)
A sad beginning of the day this morning, as I learned Jacqueline Pearce, aka Servalan in Blake's 7, has died. The most fabulous evil overlady of them all, who had the rare distinction of not solely ending her canon alive but having outlived all her opponents (both heroic and villainous).



I also bring another vid rec. Bates Motel, see tag, was the prequel-update/reboot-and-new-take-on-herror-icons series of my heart, and thus I was glad to discover Sisabet vidded Norman and Norma (and Mother; one of the not so minor feats of art in this vid is that you always know whether you're watching real Norma or Mother), to David Bowie, no less: Heroes.

Quickly

Aug. 24th, 2018 12:06 pm
selenak: (Beatles by Alexis3)
Not a new idea, but hilariously well executed: How a tv producer would respond to anything like the current White House drama being pitched. The casting suggestions alone…


In depth article about Hey Jude, the Beatles song. Predictably, half the replies to the article were about how it's not repliers favourite Beatles song/how the best Beatles song is *insert song*/How the Beatles are way overrated, etc., etc. Which had nothing to do with what the article was about.

Lastly, have a vid rec, of Star Trek (all incarnations): Harbor, a great vid celebrating all the women of Trek and their relationships with each other.
selenak: (Spider-man by Peaked)
A good example of how we all read different books even if it's the same book, especially if we go in having opinions on the subject: two revies of a new biography of Charles de Gaulle by Julian Jackson, called A certain idea of France.

The New Yorker's review


Review by the London Review of Books


What these two reviews agree on is that it's a good (both in the sense of being factual and of being well-written) biography of De Gaulle. What they utterly disagree on isn't only Charles de Gaulle but how the author sees Charles de Gaulle and what he wants to achieve with his biography. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that each reviewer went in looking for confirmation of their own opinion on Charles de Gaulle and emerged with exactly that.


On a light-hearted note, have something fannish, to wit, a Spiderman (MCU) vid:


Life Changes Utterly joyful, and a great illustration of what makes this version of Peter Parker (and his friends) so endearing.
selenak: (Porthos by Chatona)
There is a fantastic new MCU vid, Lions Inside, which also uses the most recent movies, Black Panther, Thor: Ragnarök and Infinity War:



Now, on to the book meme:

21. Summer Read

Why not try the first of the Order of the Air novels by Jo Graham and Melissa Scott, Lost Things? For me, each of them are a great summer read, but it does make sense to read them in chronological order. The 1920s, aviation, archaelogy, adventures of the "normal" and of the supernatural type, and an endearing ensemble of characters who make a found family/team that's still in the getting-together stage at this point.

22. Out of Print.

Guy Endore: The King of Paris. (At least Amazon here tells me it's out of print?) Which is a novel about two of the three Alexandre Dumas, though the first one, the general, gets the three opening chapters before finding his early and sad demise. The two Alexandres at the core of the novel are Mr. Historical Swashbuckler, the author of The Count of Monte Christo and The Three Musketeers, and his larger-than-life personality comes across vividly in the novel, and his son of Lady of the Camelies (aka La Traviata) fame. You could call it a comedy and a tragedy at the same time, immensely entertaining and yet also very aware indeed of the flaws as flaws. Considering the more recent biography of the first Alexandre, the general (son of a black slave and her white French owner) , might have reawakened interest in the Dumas family, I hope it will be republished at some point. If not - check out your local library!

The other days )
selenak: (Black Widow by Endlessdeep)
Fantastic MCU ensemble vid, covering all the movies (though not the tv shows) and conjuring poetry and emotion about the relationships and character arcs. Spoilers up to and including Infinity War:

Fanvid: Avengers Get Ready (0 words) by niyalune
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: Marvel Cinematic Universe, Guardians of the Galaxy (Movies), Black Panther (2018), Thor (Movies), Captain America (Movies), Iron Man (Movies)
Rating: Teen And Up Audiences
Warnings: Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings
Relationships: Gamora & Nebula (Marvel), Loki & Thor, Steve Rogers & Tony Stark, Steve Rogers & Natasha Romanov, James "Bucky" Barnes & Steve Rogers, Pepper Potts/Tony Stark, Peggy Carter/Steve Rogers, Wanda Maximoff/Vision, Gamora/Peter Quill, Peter Parker & Tony Stark, James "Rhodey" Rhodes & Tony Stark
Characters: Steve Rogers, Tony Stark, Thor (Marvel), Bruce Banner, Natasha Romanov (Marvel), Clint Barton, Vision (Marvel), Wanda Maximoff, Sam Wilson (Marvel), James "Rhodey" Rhodes, James "Bucky" Barnes, Nick Fury, Heimdall (Marvel), Loki (Marvel), Odin (Marvel), T'Challa (Marvel), Shuri (Marvel), T'Chaka (Marvel), Peter Parker, Scott Lang, Hope Van Dyne, Stephen Strange, Pepper Potts, Peggy Carter, Howard Stark, Gamora (Marvel), Peter Quill, Drax the Destroyer, Groot (Marvel), Rocket Raccoon, Nebula (Marvel), Yondu Udonta, Thanos (Marvel), Erik Killmonger, Hela (Marvel), Mantis (Marvel)
Additional Tags: Ensemble Cast, Fanvids, i think i've tagged the main pairings and characters, but there are a few others, i've used footage from all the movies, but this is phase 3 heavy, especially in the second half, Infinity War spoilers, like woah
Series: Part 8 of my other vids
Summary:


And we have all the love in the world


To set alight, to set alight

selenak: (Orson Welles by Moonxpoints5)
Smart, wonderful review of Cleopatra, 1963 version, too often dismissed as campy extravaganza. ([profile] amenirdis, this one is for you!) It was, of course, scripted and directed by Joseph Mankiewicz, who in this most recent list of 100 greatest screenwriters of all time makes it to No. 23 ("Says Phyllis Nagy: “There may be a more endlessly quotable screenplay than All About Eve, but I’ve yet to find it.”).

About that list: as per usual in such lists written in the English language (US edition), what they mean is "100 Greatest American Screenwriters", with the odd foreigner thrown in. They also confess right at the start: It’s worth noting that Hollywood’s traditional exclusion of women and people of color makes it extraordinarily difficult to truly qualify the best in the craft, but acknowledging today’s urgent need for more inclusive storytelling doesn’t negate the contributions of these 100 pioneers.

That said, it's very satisfying to see pioneer Frances Marion (first scriptwriter, either male or female, to win the Oscar, twice) acknowledged at No.20), and the (imo deserved) number 1 spot goes to an immigrant to whom the English language was something he only learned as an adult (which turned out to be one of the all time successful love stories between a writer and an adopted language), the late, great Billy Wilder. Some of the other choices (even keeping the US pov in mind) are bewildering, no pun intended, but such is always the case.

In terms of Hollywood history, though, it amuses me that Joe Mankiewicz' brother Herman only makes it to No.56 while Orson Welles lands at No.41. Pauline Kael would roll in her grave. As the list writers themselves put it: Once upon a time, a small firestorm might have ignited over placing Orson Welles on a list of great screenwriters. For years, his co-authorship of Citizen Kane was in dispute, with many claiming that the credit belonged almost entirely to the great Herman J. Mankiewicz. (Pauline Kael even wrote an explosive, brilliant, deeply problematic essay arguing so, only for much of her research to be discredited later.) But even if he hadn’t co-written Citizen Kane (which he absolutely did), Welles would have been one of the great screenwriters of the 20th century. He was certainly one of the great adapters, able to take everything from the most acclaimed classics (think The Trial) to the lowest-brow pulp (think Touch of Evil) and make it his own. His Shakespeare adaptations are gems of concision and imagination, balancing respect for the text with a willingness to innovate. Look at the incredible Chimes at Midnight, where he takes pieces of several of the Bard’s plays and turns them into something completely modern.

I'm totally with them in terms of Orson as an adapter. (Which, btw, Welles biographer Simon Callow argues is what he did with Citizen Kane, too - Hermann Mankiewicz' original script - with some imput from John Houseman - was over three hours long, and Welles did what he did with Shakespeare, Kafka, and whoever wrote Touch of Evil - he cut, edited, added, rewrote, until the script had the shooting shape.) It's what makes his version of The Trial infinitely more interesting than the far more literal, bland and justly forgotten version of Kyle McLachlan as Joseph K. much later, and makes Chimes at Midnight show up later adaptions of the Henriad such as The Hollow Crown as deeply conventional and pulling their punches by comparison.

On a book-to-film note, thanks to [personal profile] chaila I've discovered Fall Equinox, a vid-athon wherein the vids in question are using book-based source material. I've only just started to watch my way through it, but check out Wherever I Go, a breathtaking exploration of the Gods in American Gods!

Links

Jun. 23rd, 2017 01:10 pm
selenak: (rootbeer)
Confessions of a Trekker: I really don't like ST VI - The Undiscovered Country. Which is, I've discovered, something of a minority opinion, for at least the vocal part of fandom holds this last cinematic outing of the TOS crew in a fond light. However, now and then the dissent becomes vocal, too, as in this rewatch post about the movie in question .


In more fun Trek news, check out this vid about everyone's favourite Cardassian tailor-plus-spy:

Dedicated Follower of Fashion

(Every now and then I wish the movies instead of going for the nth version of Wrath of Khan (with or without a villain called Khan) would tackle the Cardassians instead. And then I conclude the movies would probably mishandle the Cardassians as badly as they did the Romulans, and am glad the Cardassians so far have been reserved for tv.)

And lastly, a BSG fanfic rec:

Rippling Light: tender and heartbreaking take on the friendship of Felix Gaeta and Anastasia Dualla, two characters for whom the phrase "they deserved better" might have been invented.
selenak: (Peggy and Jarvis by Asthenie_VD)
...and I've now inhaled the 35 great results of the [community profile] ssrconfidential ficathon. Here is a preliminary list of recs (beyond the story I got as a gift, which is fabulous, I repeat, and which I linked several entries earlier):

Staring off with a vid:

Bad Romance: Dottie/Peggy being best enemies with UST to a song made for them. The way they mirror each other was never clearer, or more musical fun.

Stories:

Out of the Cave follow-up on Whitney Frost that doesn't ignore what happened to her and takes it into account but also provides her with a new beginning as Dottie, for reasons of A Cunning Plan, teams up with her. I'd watch that episode - or spin-off!

Not your fairytale princess: Dottie and Peggy (do we sense a theme here?) being their frenemy selves. All the writers manage to get Dottie so well because they don't downplay how dangerous she is, obsession with Peggy not withstanding.

Redacted: Four kisses from Dottie that never made it in Peggy's reports. This one spans decades, and the last one is heartbreaking in the best way.

Four times Peggy tried to run away (and the one time it finally worked): Peggy and her brother Michael. I have a soft spot for sibling dynamics, and this is a beautiful take on them.

Teamwork Peggy and Jarvis fighting crime together was by far my favourite aspect of Agent Carter, and the story captures their dynamic exactly. Love it!

Like a house on fire: more of the original Jarvis, this time exploring his take on Howard. (With plenty of Peggy as well.) Funny and touching in turns.

Rose in the Spring Rose Roberts between seasons 1 and 2. The bigger role Rose had in s2 was such a delightful surprise, and this story additionally fleshes her out.

My own story is, I think, a bit less obvious than usual, but still guessable.
selenak: (Henry and Eleanor by Poisoninjest)
So, last year, I signed up on this small endearing historical fiction exchange ficathon, which would have allowed me to post a text just consisting of 500 hundred words, and managed to end up writing an entire novella about Eleanor of Aquitaine because using the "Five things which never happened" concept for her just seemed irresistable. This year, the History Exchange ficathon is open for nominations again, and this time, I am resolved. Only a brief text. That's going to be it.

Meanwhile, if someone should volunteer to write me that "Juana the Probably Not Mad marries Henry Tudor" AU I've been speculating about now and then, feel free to make it as lengthy as you want. :)

Star Wars:

All interested parties probably have already watched this by now, but just in case: Formerly known as is a fabulous vid about the women of Star Wars.


Orphan Black:

ditto: the one where Beth is an actual ghost. Sharp and wonderful.

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 07:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios