selenak: (JustinIris - Andraste)
selenak ([personal profile] selenak) wrote2008-01-16 06:10 pm

(no subject)

Randomly, while watching a season 3 House episode: so, does House get an incest case at least once per season? If so, are we sure David Shore isn’t the alias of a fanfic writer? (Come to think of it, the only time House has been wrong about suspecting incest was the case with the teenager having nightmares. This strengthens my suspicions about Shore.)

Which is as good a place as any to do the obligatory “my take on incest in multifandom” post which everyone seems to write sooner or later. I’m afraid mine will be a bit boring, but here it goes. (Oh, yeah: spoilers for Carnivale, Twin Peaks, Jacobean drama and Romantic poet drama of the rl variety, no spoilers for Heroes, Supernatural and three shows created by Joss Whedon beyond basic character constellations.)



1) Having written about Byron and his sister Augusta at 19, I really don’t have a read/write about incest squick level per se, and definitely am not in a position to throw stones about anyone’s interest in writing or reading about it.

2) I suspect people’s theories about incest being the new slash in the sense that people need taboos for their pairing to break and same-sex relationships don’t really cut it for them anymore are probably true for some of the writers, but I’m always hesitant to sweepingly ascribe motives to lots of people I don’t know, not even in the sense of knowing their writing.

3) As with non-incest pairings, sometimes I see the subtext and sometimes I don’t. This seems to be random on my part. For example, based on one season of Supernatural - which will in all likelihood remain the only one, since I wasn’t that captivate – I just don’t see it with the Winchesters (in any combinations). While an overwhelming majority of fandom obviously does. And in the Jossverse, I see it only with the Fanged Four (who aren’t biologically related, but the shows obviously don’t use line like “I’m your son’s other mother” (Drusilla to Anne) or Darla calling Angel her “darling boy” without intention). No Crazy Space Incest for me, sorry. (Not least because River/Anybody has a squick level for me due to her mental state, and Simon is so very protective of her.) Otoh, I started to get an inkling of where the Petrellicesters in Heroes were coming from around episode 1.07 and somewhere between 1.10 and 1.13, I thought, fine, yes, there is deliberate subtext. Now, being a gen writer by talent and inclination, this did not result in me writing Nathan/Peter slash, but I read it now and then. (There is also the problem of there being hardly any gen stories about either Petrelli, but then there are hardly any gen stories about any Heroes character, as I found out when looking for Matt and Mohinder fic this season, and Claire stories that don’t pair her up with anyone, full stop. Since I believe in doing something instead of complaining, I did my share to heighten the quota of gen Petrelli tales as well non-‘shippy Claire fiction, Matt gen and Mohinder gen.)

4) And then there is canon incest, by which I mean you don’t have to agree on whether or not you see the subtext because the book/show/film doesn’t leave room for ambiguity anymore. This more often than not means an intergenerational sexual abuse story (Laura and Leland Palmer in Twin Peaks come to mind). More rarely, it’s a tragic sibling romance. (Check out your Jacobean dramas: ’Tis Pity She is A Whore, John Ford.) And even more rarely, it’s neither abusive nor tragic, just messed up. The couple on my icon, Justin and Iris Crowe from Carnivale, being a case in point. Justin and Iris are also rare in that they’re middle aged and the fact they’re sexually attracted to each other is actually one of the least disturbing things about them. I like my canon incest in the way I like my characterisation in general: are those people interesting, is their relationship plausible or do I get the impression the incest is just there because the writer couldn’t think of anything else and wanted to be daring/deep/dark? Which means in the three cases I mentioned: yes, it is and they are (the Palmers, that is), people complaining about Romeo and Juliet being stupid should take a look at these two (never got the point of Ford), and damm you, Knauf, if you had to dumb down Justin into a one dimensional evil blacker-than-black villain in season 2, couldn’t you at least given us more middle-aged sibling kissing instead of frightened maid(en)s?

5) And to return to the beginning. One of the reasons why I wrote about Byron and Augusta back when I was 19 (which will be 19 years ago this year, yikes) was because he wrote her the following letter from self-imposed exile: I have never ceased nor can cease to feel for a moment that boundless attachment which bound & binds me to you, which renders me incapable of real love for any other human being – what could they be to me after you? We may have been wrong – but I repent of nothing except that cursed marriage - & your refusing to continue to love me as you had loved me – I can neither forget nor quite forgive you for that precious piece of reformation. But I can never be other than I have been – and whenever I love anything it reminds me of some way of you. That, and the fact that when they were together, what he loved most about her was that she laughed both with and about him instead of going with his self dramatizations. Passion and shared laughter. It’s a combination that sounds irresistible when you’re 19, and not just then.

[identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Yet, anyway. Of course, Nathan does seem to like Matt so far, but that doesn't rule out Peter giving him dirt looks.

Just wait till he hears Nathan has been flying with Matt. That'll do the trick.

Or maybe it's a game like putting the helix symbol into the show! We'll know that when we start seeing the photo crop up in Hiro's cubicle and as Micah's screensaver.

Ts. Hiro has the Elder photo (that's the other photo which turns up everywhere, even in Montreal - don't you love Adam being that attached to the old crowd?) in his cubicle, and Micah has the helix symbol as his screensaver, but I'm willing to bet that in the reporting about Nathan getting shot, one variation of the photo will appear in the Petrelli backstory, so either Claire will see it on tv or *insert other Heroes character* will read it in a magazine. Probably the "before" photo, not the after one or the one where Peter is whispering into Nathan's ear. (Repeat chorus of: what was the photographer thinking?)

Sidenote: when 12_12_12 made me write a dvd commentary for "Family Ways" I realized with amusement I smuggled the photo in there, too (Claire nicked it).

[identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I recognize Bobbi and Profit and Justin and Iris, of course, but who is the third canon cest couple?

[identity profile] cadesama.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Just wait till he hears Nathan has been flying with Matt. That'll do the trick.

And then he'll probably start with snide comments about weight and hurting Nathan's back. Because Peter really can be that passive aggressive.

(that's the other photo which turns up everywhere, even in Montreal - don't you love Adam being that attached to the old crowd?)

Especially since the photo was taken while he was imprisoned, so he must have swiped a copy from Maury once he started murdering. While, actually, considering that Maury has pieces of one laying around in Fight or Flight isn't that bad of continuity.

And, to be fair to Hiro, he found a copy in a box of records about Primatech.

so either Claire will see it on tv or *insert other Heroes character* will read it in a magazine. Probably the "before" photo, not the after one or the one where Peter is whispering into Nathan's ear. (Repeat chorus of: what was the photographer thinking?)

Probably not, unless the newscasters in that universe have a very strange sense of humor. I actually keep imaging Claire finding out about the shooting while watching MSN, with a newsticker at the bottom, so she'd probably just get the shooting itself a hundred times over. However, when she goes to the hospital to inject him with ~*~magic blood~*~, she'll obviously see the photos set up next to him. And Peter probably rocking out his own attempt at a hobo!beard.

Sidenote: when 12_12_12 made me write a dvd commentary for "Family Ways" I realized with amusement I smuggled the photo in there, too (Claire nicked it).

Scarily enough, so did I in "(No) Shots Fired." I said she took more than one photo, but I definitely meant that the wedding photo was one of them.

[identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
And then he'll probably start with snide comments about weight and hurting Nathan's back. Because Peter really can be that passive aggressive.

Also, we're still due a parallel scene to Nathan's hospital scene with Simone, remember!

Re: Maury, this reminds me - why do you think, given that Maury has his type of power, does he submit to Adam and never went for the top job back in the past? (And rather insultingly, both Bob and Angela immediately deduce that Maury can't be more than the instrument.) Is he just a born beta?

Don't scare me with the image of bearded!Peter.

Scarily enough, so did I in "(No) Shots Fired." I said she took more than one photo, but I definitely meant that the wedding photo was one of them.

We're clearly attuned to the creators' minds when it comes to the Petrellis.*g*

[identity profile] wee-warrior.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
And then he'll probably start with snide comments about weight and hurting Nathan's back. Because Peter really can be that passive aggressive.

This reminds me of that one interview with Milo and Adrian, where Milo said at some point that flying with him was definitely better for Adrian than flying with Greg all the time. Obviously, he was gearing up for his role here.

[identity profile] suburbangoth.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
oh man. i'd totally forgotten how terrifying & creepy justin/iris was.

i still hate hbo for canceling that show.

[identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Obviously. *g*

Re: P.S.

[identity profile] londonkds.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Ahem. How much info do you want?

In reverse chronology:

The McGann TVM was the eventual result of a plan for a US Who series which in its earlier versions would have been an entirely new continuity in which the Doctor and the Master were brothers, although all of this was forgotten when they decided to keep it in the old continuity.

In the Peter Davison story Planet Of Fire the Doctor, in one of his sterner moods, tries to incinerate the Master, causing the Master to beg "How can you do this to your own... AAAARGH". It has been widely rumoured that the line was originally intended to end "...brother" but that the then creative team thought better of it at the last minute. If the line is acknowledged by fans at all, conservative fans assume that it would have ended "...kind" or "old school pal", while slashers go straight for "...boyfriend".

Going way back it is generally agreed that if Roger Delgado had not been killed in a car crash the Third Doctor's final story would have been one in which the Master redemptively sacrificed his own life permanently to give the Doctor a chance to regenerate and survive. Some rumours have it that it would have been revealed that the Master was the Doctor's brother, others that there would have been a more mystical connection between them.

I interpret the "You've watched too much TV" line in "Sound Of Drums" as mocking the original McGann plan and US TV's tendency to turn everything into a fraternal or father/son story, altohugh some anti-RTD types weirdly interpret it as an insult against online fandom.

[identity profile] mimesh.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)
And then he'll probably start with snide comments about weight and hurting Nathan's back. Because Peter really can be that passive aggressive.

Oh yeah. But I would really love to see Matt interacting with both brothers and Peter getting jealous because Matt and Nathan bonded when he was busy being Adam's pet. I want to see Matt and the Petrellis taking down the company. That's why I hope that [livejournal.com profile] wee_warrior's theory is true and the shooting was set up by those three but I'm still not ready to get my hopes up.

And Peter probably rocking out his own attempt at a hobo!beard.

Bwahah. Imagining Peter with a beard had me laughing out loud but then I remembered that I saw pictures of Milo with some fuzz. No competition (http://i15.tinypic.com/6twthrb.jpg) for the Pasbeard (http://i1.tinypic.com/89smrgw.jpg) though...

[identity profile] cadesama.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Also, we're still due a parallel scene to Nathan's hospital scene with Simone, remember!

You know, between that , Peter freaking out and mourning Nathan in some way, and his inevitable sparking of Elle (and probable some more), they have a lot of book end scenes they need to get cracking on.

Is he just a born beta?

I think so, really. He's a con man, so he doesn't have ideas of his own. He just knows how to reflect back the ideas of other people in shinier or more horrific ways, depending on what he's after. Now, admittedly, creating nightmares for people on his own wouldn't be as effective, but it all does fit together pretty well. The funny part, of course, is that he's equally getting conned by Adam who is seemingly giving him the respect he clearly wants that no one else will.

Don't scare me with the image of bearded!Peter.

Hey, I saw pics of Milo with a beard not that long ago! He actually looked fine. It's the stages between having a full beard and stubble that look completely horrific on him.

We're clearly attuned to the creators' minds when it comes to the Petrellis.*g*

It's funny 'cause it's true! Down to predicting about half of the 0.07% post-death conversation! :D

[identity profile] cadesama.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
With all the time that the writers have had to hang out online, even if it wasn't their original plan to have the shooting all be a set up, there's a good chance it will be now.

Imagining Peter with a beard had me laughing out loud but then I remembered that I saw pictures of Milo with some fuzz. No competition for the Pasbeard though...

See, it's not that bad! It's mostly the glasses and hilarious expressions!

[identity profile] wee-warrior.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 05:42 pm (UTC)(link)
With all the time that the writers have had to hang out online, even if it wasn't their original plan to have the shooting all be a set up, there's a good chance it will be now.

Hey, maybe they'll pay me for it! (Well, me and the dozen or so other people who came up with the idea. And Jack Coleman of course.)

[identity profile] kattahj.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Octavian and Octavia. Not sure what the RL historical people would say about the canonity, but the TV versions seduced each other rather thoroughly. :-)

[identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, right. I actually found that one of the least bit convincing twists of Rome, not just because a) my inner historian groaned, and b) it seemed at the time to be a result of the following tv writer thought process: "One of the big shockers in I, Claudius was the Caligula/Drusilla incest, so we better get some incest here, too", but because c) the way it came about seemed singularly unconvincing. I mean, I can buy Octavia is in love with Servilia and influenced and acting out anger about Atia and what not, but the step to "you know what would really piss off your mother who killed your husband and would maybe get me a secret, honey? Seduce your brother!" just was too bewildering.

Mind you, I found the scene where he finds her in full self-loathing punishment and forgives her and takes her home very touching, but otherwise that whole storyline just had me shaking my head.

[identity profile] kattahj.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I really enjoyed it, not so much for her part in it as for his - she thinks she's seduced him into telling the truth, and he reveals that he's known what she's up to all along and went along with it anyway, because hey, this way he gets to sleep with her.

At that point, I stopped caring that she would Never Do That, and that he had never shown any sign to be in lust with her before, because that was just Octavian at his Magnificent Bastard finest.

Re: P.S.

[identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com 2008-01-17 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't experience it in my Trek fandoms of old or in B5, but otherwise, yeah. All too common, which is really depressing.

Re: P.S.

[identity profile] beck-liz.livejournal.com 2008-01-21 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
Mind you, there were also a lot of Spike/Buffy 'shippers who truly loved both characters

*waves* Most of us fled for non-crazy parts after we realized that a good proportion of our fellow shippers hated 1/2 of our ship. I've never understood that.

Isn't that mandatory by now? Not that he hasn't given some rather unfortunate interviews lately, but I don't remember a point where the Rusty hate wasn't alive and well.

Err, when New Who started?


I remember someone telling me that a certain segment of Classic Who fans were terrified of what RTD was going to do to their show. I think I even remember hearing some old interview of someone whose name I don't remember who actually stated that they preferred that Who not be brought back at all if it was Rusty that was doing it.

Re: P.S.

[identity profile] selenak.livejournal.com 2008-01-21 06:10 am (UTC)(link)
*waves back* [livejournal.com profile] kathyh who is my oldest online friend is an enthusistic Spike/Buffy'shipper, and there was much bewilderment (and relief when she found the non-crazy parts) from her during those days...

I think I even remember hearing some old interview of someone whose name I don't remember who actually stated that they preferred that Who not be brought back at all if it was Rusty that was doing it.

Entirely possible, as fannish arguments about producers predate New Who by decades. (I remember [livejournal.com profile] londonkds once observing that one better never utter the words "John Nathan Turner" if one didn't want a passionate argument within minutes.) Though the first time viewers who didn't know anything about DW and knew Rusty (presumably) from earlier efforts like Queer as Folk or The Prophecy, if at all, were in a none-hate mood back in those new series starting days

Page 3 of 3