![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The rant meme making the rounds has produced some interesting results so far. (No, I won't post it here. I'm not much good at rants, unless we're talking films that have Romans bathing with their togas on or novels that write Elizabeth Tudor like a total ditz ruled by her favourites. (In other words, like Queenie in Blackadder only without the irony and without Mirana Richardson.) (Looking at you, Philippa Gregory.) You can also have a Richard III was framed diatribe, but that's it, and anyway, right now I don't have the time.
I've got the time for some fun and quick reading, though. Here are three of the most entertaining rants I found:
Shakespeare authorship rant. Or, why it was Will from Stratford and not Bacon/de Vere/Marlowe, you literary snobs. G.B. Shaw wrote a rant like this once, but the lj version is a kick for my inner Shakespearean as well.
(I'm also vaguely reminded of
coffee_and_ink recently defining the stages of the oedipal aspects of fandom like this: (1) I love the show! It's perfect! (2) The show used to be perfect, and now it sucks! But it can't be the fault of the same person who gave me the previous perfection -- it must be this other person who is making my idol do these horrible things! (3) Fuck it, my idol has become an abomination, I hate them all. In Shakespearean terms, we'd get: (1) These plays rule! (2) Okay, Pericles and Cymbeline not so much. And what was he thinking with that bore about Henry VIII.? I know, it was all Beaumont & Fletcher, the hacks! (3) Never mind the Stratford guy with his bourgeois tastes, Marlowe is the real thing anyway!)
Xavier and Magneto (mis)characterisation, by
penknife, who writes them beautifully. If you're not into X-Men, you can apply what she says to many a hero (suddenly rendered as a vile humourless megalomaniac brute in fanfic) and many an ambiguous villain (suddenly finding himself performing out-of-character villainous deeds without regard to his motives and general code; I'm still smarting from the Bester, torturer-at-large nonsense over at B5).
And because I just can't resist, and because their 'shippers take it so very seriously, no pun intended: : Remus/Sirius - their love is so fanon. Besides, I just love the phrase: Shutting oneself up with dead rats and a hippogryff is not a sign of a man happily reunited with the love of his life.*g*
I've got the time for some fun and quick reading, though. Here are three of the most entertaining rants I found:
Shakespeare authorship rant. Or, why it was Will from Stratford and not Bacon/de Vere/Marlowe, you literary snobs. G.B. Shaw wrote a rant like this once, but the lj version is a kick for my inner Shakespearean as well.
(I'm also vaguely reminded of
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Xavier and Magneto (mis)characterisation, by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
And because I just can't resist, and because their 'shippers take it so very seriously, no pun intended: : Remus/Sirius - their love is so fanon. Besides, I just love the phrase: Shutting oneself up with dead rats and a hippogryff is not a sign of a man happily reunited with the love of his life.*g*
no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 09:51 pm (UTC)Of course we are!
no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 11:00 pm (UTC)*supermarket chain in the South -- logo is a happy pig
no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 05:54 am (UTC)The Shakespeare rant was very entertaining. I think these so called academics just like to hear themselves expounding, so grab onto some obscure rational to deny Shakespeare his due. I agree completely that it doesn't matter what Shakespeare did or did not do in his life; what matters is the amazing body of work he left us.