Arthur Miller
Feb. 11th, 2005 06:41 pmArthur Miller died. Sometimes you have to divorce people from their work in order to enjoy the later, but in Miller's case, I could like and admire both. And he wrote and got his plays staged right until he died, something any author longs for. Miller's earnest psychoanalysis, his tackling of social issues might look old fashioned now, but to me, it was a good fashion. How many writers manage to create an archetype, not just a good character but a true archetype like Don Quixotte, or Falstaff? He did. Willy Loman, chasing the American Dream right into his grave, and his son Biff, the high school star broken by reality. When, in Stephen Sondheim's Assassins, John Wilkes Booth tells Lee Harvey Oswald "I'm an actor, Lee, and a good one, but Willy Loman is not a part I'll ever play" after giving us that quote about respect that haunts salesman, the audience doesn't need a summary of the play, or of Loman's character. We know him. Willy Loman. When Joss Whedon in Restless lets Willow dream about a bizarre production of Death of a Salesman, he expects us to know the real plot of Salesman, and the fact the scenes Willow sees have nothing to do with it. Men and their sales, indeed.
And how many writers have wrought such exquisite revenge on their tormentors? The MacCarthyites will forever be associated with a bunch of hysterical teenage girls from Salem, Massachusetts, whose tactis of diversion become a death trap and a murder spree. Never mind about MacCarthy, though. I saw The Crucible on state several times, most recently in New York, with Liam Neeson as John Proctor and Laura Linney as his wife Elizabeth, and its power still holds in the 21st century, in different (though really that different?) world than the one which inspired Miller. The moment when Proctor's sole chance at stopping the madness, Mary, breaks and returns to the group? It still shattered me.
And then there is Miller the screen writer. The Misfits famously is the film that saw his marriage with Marilyn Monroe break for good. And yet he wrote that part for her which she always wanted, the one not using the Marilyn Monroe persona anymore, and no matter how hellish the condition of its making, she shines in it. Roslyn is a woman, not a girl (as opposed to her other roles), she's not cute, she's divorced, and when she rails at Gable and Clift for what they do. the issue of cowboys, themselves relics of another time, and horses brought to the slaughter becomes so much more. One watches this film and wishes not just that Monroe had played more parts like that but that Miller had written more scripts than the few he did. But then the theatre was his passion, not the movies, and that was probably for the best. Ave atque vale, Sir. You were a great writer and a part of what I admire about America, and you shall be missed.
And how many writers have wrought such exquisite revenge on their tormentors? The MacCarthyites will forever be associated with a bunch of hysterical teenage girls from Salem, Massachusetts, whose tactis of diversion become a death trap and a murder spree. Never mind about MacCarthy, though. I saw The Crucible on state several times, most recently in New York, with Liam Neeson as John Proctor and Laura Linney as his wife Elizabeth, and its power still holds in the 21st century, in different (though really that different?) world than the one which inspired Miller. The moment when Proctor's sole chance at stopping the madness, Mary, breaks and returns to the group? It still shattered me.
And then there is Miller the screen writer. The Misfits famously is the film that saw his marriage with Marilyn Monroe break for good. And yet he wrote that part for her which she always wanted, the one not using the Marilyn Monroe persona anymore, and no matter how hellish the condition of its making, she shines in it. Roslyn is a woman, not a girl (as opposed to her other roles), she's not cute, she's divorced, and when she rails at Gable and Clift for what they do. the issue of cowboys, themselves relics of another time, and horses brought to the slaughter becomes so much more. One watches this film and wishes not just that Monroe had played more parts like that but that Miller had written more scripts than the few he did. But then the theatre was his passion, not the movies, and that was probably for the best. Ave atque vale, Sir. You were a great writer and a part of what I admire about America, and you shall be missed.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 06:40 pm (UTC)Looking outside of the US, I don't see a successor that comes to mind, either... David Mamet, hm... not the same. Just not the same.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 08:07 pm (UTC)oooh. . .*is jealous*; though I did see a lovely university production of "The Crucible"; one thing that surprises me about Miller is that, as far as I know, his stage work has not translated that well to film. I thought the 90s "Crucible" suffered from trying to look "realistic," which killed much of the . . . I don't know what word I'm looking for. atmosphere? ambience? and none of the filmed "Salesman" productions I've seen were memorable (unless you count the one in "Restless" -- you men and your . . .SALES!) On the other hand, I think a lot of today's film & TV learned from techniques Miller used in "Salesman" -- everything Alan Ball has written, for instance, seems deeply indebted, both in content and form.
putting Misfits in the queue. . .
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 11:05 pm (UTC)(There is an old Crucible, too, for which Sartre wrote the script. Miller saw the start, which showed a lot of crucifixes as befit a French Catholic village but most certainly not an American Puritan town, and gave up from there, according to his memoirs. I never saw it at all, so couldn't say.)
Yes, Alan Ball is definitely Millerian in his subjects and the way he uses past interfering with present in physical form, etc. Perhaps the difference is that Ball does not do direct adaptions but rather uses the techniques for his own stories?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 08:39 am (UTC)How true. Back in my school days, history classes used to be rather euro-centric, so the first time I ever heard about the MacCarthy-an witch crazes was when my English Leistungskurs teacher decided to read The Crucible with us.
A very good introduction to the darker side of American cultural history.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:42 am (UTC)Since
no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 12:53 pm (UTC)I do. Episodes 8-13, all complete and in perfectly reasonable quality.
If you want them, just let me know whether they should be sent to B. or to your usual place of residence ;-)