Mary Renault, did you lie to me?
Dec. 1st, 2025 06:45 pmNot being an Alexander the Great fangirl, I had never read the primary sources (which were written centuries later, because all the contemporary sources on AtG were lost) on everyone's favourite Macedon, but now I got around to reading at least Plutarch. And you know, if there is ONE thing not just the late Ms Renault and her trilogy but the entire internet led me to believe, it's that Hephaistion was Alexander's One True Love And Soulmate; even absolute homophobes concede him as the friend of friends, the Patroclos to Alexander's Achilles, etc. So imagine my suprrise when I stumbled upon these few paragraphs by good old Plutarch:
Moreover, when he saw that among his chiefest friends Hephaestion approved his course and joined him in changing his mode of life, while Craterus clung fast to his native ways, he employed the former in his business with the Barbarians, the latter in that with the Greeks and Macedonians. And in general he showed most affection for Hephaestion, but most esteem for Craterus, thinking, and constantly saying, that Hephaestion was a friend of Alexander, but Craterus a friend of the king.
For this reason, too, the men cherished a secret grudge against one another and often came into open collision. And once, on the Indian expedition, they actually drew their swords and closed with one another, and as the friends of each were coming to his aid, Alexander rode up and abused Hephaestion publicly, calling him a fool and a madman for not knowing that without Alexander's favour he was nothing; and in private he also sharply reproved Craterus.
Then he brought them together and reconciled them, taking an oath by Ammon and the rest of the gods that he loved them most of all men; but that if he heard of their quarrelling again, he would kill them both, or at least the one who began the quarrel. Wherefore after this they neither did nor said anything to harm one another, not even in jest.
Craterus? CRATERUS? And he "abused Hephaistion publicly?" Hephaistion - who in fiction shows up eternally chill and calming emo Alex down - was jealous of some guy who wasn't at least Bagoas? Truly, this is not what I expected.
To be fair: Plutarch also later describes the complete breakdown and momentous grief for Hephaistion when Heph dies. (Oh, and he does mention Bagoas as well, to wit: We are told, too, that he was once viewing some contests in singing and dancing, being well heated with wine, and that his favourite, Bagoas, won the prize for song and dance, and then, all in his festal array, passed through the theatre and took his seat by Alexander's side; at sight of which the Macedonians clapped their hands and loudly bade the king kiss the victor, until at last he threw his arms about him and kissed him tenderly. ) Still. I feel let down by the OTPlers.
Not really surprised, though. This kind of thing happens constantly in Frederician fandom.
To celebrate the latest example of research making everyone more complicated, I'm linking this gem, which includes both Alex and Fritz:
Moreover, when he saw that among his chiefest friends Hephaestion approved his course and joined him in changing his mode of life, while Craterus clung fast to his native ways, he employed the former in his business with the Barbarians, the latter in that with the Greeks and Macedonians. And in general he showed most affection for Hephaestion, but most esteem for Craterus, thinking, and constantly saying, that Hephaestion was a friend of Alexander, but Craterus a friend of the king.
For this reason, too, the men cherished a secret grudge against one another and often came into open collision. And once, on the Indian expedition, they actually drew their swords and closed with one another, and as the friends of each were coming to his aid, Alexander rode up and abused Hephaestion publicly, calling him a fool and a madman for not knowing that without Alexander's favour he was nothing; and in private he also sharply reproved Craterus.
Then he brought them together and reconciled them, taking an oath by Ammon and the rest of the gods that he loved them most of all men; but that if he heard of their quarrelling again, he would kill them both, or at least the one who began the quarrel. Wherefore after this they neither did nor said anything to harm one another, not even in jest.
Craterus? CRATERUS? And he "abused Hephaistion publicly?" Hephaistion - who in fiction shows up eternally chill and calming emo Alex down - was jealous of some guy who wasn't at least Bagoas? Truly, this is not what I expected.
To be fair: Plutarch also later describes the complete breakdown and momentous grief for Hephaistion when Heph dies. (Oh, and he does mention Bagoas as well, to wit: We are told, too, that he was once viewing some contests in singing and dancing, being well heated with wine, and that his favourite, Bagoas, won the prize for song and dance, and then, all in his festal array, passed through the theatre and took his seat by Alexander's side; at sight of which the Macedonians clapped their hands and loudly bade the king kiss the victor, until at last he threw his arms about him and kissed him tenderly. ) Still. I feel let down by the OTPlers.
Not really surprised, though. This kind of thing happens constantly in Frederician fandom.
To celebrate the latest example of research making everyone more complicated, I'm linking this gem, which includes both Alex and Fritz:
no subject
Date: 2025-12-01 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 01:40 am (UTC)I remember chatting with some Classics grad students back in my grad student days some 20 years ago, and I suddenly realized I couldn't remember:
Me: "Who killed Alcibiades?"
Other grad student: "Who DIDN'T kill Alcibiades?"
:'D
no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 06:51 am (UTC)Teacher: "Catilina wishes."
no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-01 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 06:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 10:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-01 10:31 pm (UTC)They are so complicated that I have the outline of a scholarly journal article I'd like to write about Fritz vs. Alexander sources, only I need to brush up on my Alexander first. Which I started doing yesterday and, which, uh, would be a lot easier if a certain three of us were doing a Classics salon.
Given how quiet things have been on the Fritzian front, has the time come at last? I'm now hanging out with classicists at a university with a good library! I'm going to a Mycenaean-Minoan museum exhibit on Saturday, and I'm trying to brush up on my archaeology this week! We could make this happen!
no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 07:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 05:07 pm (UTC)unless I write that treatThough my time is limited for the next couple of weeks, see also Yuletide and music)Should I make a post? (Or should we make a community or is one of you dying to take a turn? I am super super happy to make a post, I love being the salonniere, but wanted to make sure I wasn't stepping on any toes)
Should I be reading Plutarch? Or something else?
(also I know very little about Alexander; I know more about him than I knew about Fritz than we started but that's saying... very little)
no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-03 08:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 07:48 pm (UTC)Kleitus!Heinrich would have to have less of a survival instinct* than Prussian!Heinrich, just as my AU Heinrich had to be a lot less loyal to Fritz and the state than actual Heinrich.
* Or maybe just be a lot more intoxicated? Those Macedonians and their unwatered wine.
Cahn is on board with Classics salon, let's do it! I have no time, but let's do it! I'm never going to write a paper on Alexander and Fritz otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2025-12-03 08:08 am (UTC)Given Fritz in real life after the Hubertusday incident stayed the hell away from too much wine, it's hard to say whether he'd have killed Heinrich with alcohol-induced lowered inhibitions upon being compared to Dad to his disadvantage, but with Alexander's temper, he definitely would have.
Speaking of Hubertus, burning of Persepolis = razing of Hubertusburg (et al, i.e. the other Saxon castles)? No Thais necessary?
no subject
Date: 2025-12-01 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 07:26 am (UTC)(p.S. Sorry for first posting the reply to another comment here.)
no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 12:36 am (UTC)Also, yeah, no. We clearly need to have a Classics salon so I can tell you (and Cahn!) all about the picture of "Hephaistion the eternally quarrelsome" as painted by historians. Complete with Alexander having to calm him down!
no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 01:22 am (UTC)I think it's hilarious that he abused Hephaistion publicly, but only reproved Craterus in private.
no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 07:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-02 07:36 am (UTC)Re: nobody being chill - what about Ptolemy? He gives the impression that while he wants power and success as much as the rest, he's good at keeping his cool and a bland facade. Hence also the ability to outmaneouvre Perdiccas by the body heist which apparantly Perdiccas did not see coming.
no subject
Date: 2025-12-03 03:49 am (UTC)One of the more amusing moments of my life was when I was doing research on eunuchs of the classical era at the Library of Congress in the early 00s, desperately trying to track down info on what turned out to be a seriously under-researched topic. All that I knew at the start was what Mary Renault said in the historical note of The Persian Boy.
Every single historian I consulted drew their findings from that historical note.