CULINARY GUILT: Chocolate. As with most of the population. How can you resist chocolate? Or, in another understanding of the phrase "culinary guilt": I always feel slightly guilty about the fact I can't cook when most of my cousins and friends can...
LITERARY GUILT: Still haven't read Tolstoi. Neither War and Peace nor Anna Karenina nor the Kreutzer Sonata, all three of which I really want to read. Damm it. Also, if you mean guilty pleasures: the Star of the Guardians novels by Margaret Weis. Which is a shameless/clever/use word of choice thing using the basic Star Wars: A New Hope set-up (young hero, mentor gets killed, quippy mercenary, Dark Lord who used to be one of the good guys before he turned, noble lady imprisoned) and spins it in a different direction, making the dark lord and the lady of an age and giving them an intense love/hate relationship, and has Weis' usual religious hang-up and very questionable politics (instead of an Evil Empire, we have an Evil Atheistic Republic where previously there used to be a Not Ideal But God-fearing Monarchy, and our young hero is the destined king and brings back the monarchy, don't you know). Also, she sucks at translating Latin. ("...et cum spirito tuo" doesn't mean "and may his spirit be with you" but "and may (the lord) be with your spirit", woman! After Vatican II gave us mass in our native languages, you have no excuse for not knowing that, if you're using part of a formula that belongs to the responses of the community during Catholic mass) And? I still love those books and cry my heart out over Derek Sagan (that would be the Vader equivalent) and the Lady Maigrey (that would be Leia, if Leia weren't his daughter but his age and if he had this telepathic bond with her and they had betrayed and rescued each other a couple of times and...) every time.
A/V GUILT: Currently? I'm trying to get into The Prisoner and it just doesn't work. I expected to fall for it, given that I like my British tv classics and my surrealism, and several people whose judgment I very much respect are fans, but after three episodes, I'm still just going "well, so?" and "neat use of Portmairion".
MUSICAL GUILT: I have been known to visit Andrew Llyod Webber musicals repeatedly. And to buy the cds for same. And not just the three classics he made with Tim Rice, so...
CELEBRITY GUILT: Here I have to stretch, but... after watching The Queen, I thought: if these were fictional characters instead of real ones, I would so 'ship Elizabeth II/Tony Blair...
LITERARY GUILT: Still haven't read Tolstoi. Neither War and Peace nor Anna Karenina nor the Kreutzer Sonata, all three of which I really want to read. Damm it. Also, if you mean guilty pleasures: the Star of the Guardians novels by Margaret Weis. Which is a shameless/clever/use word of choice thing using the basic Star Wars: A New Hope set-up (young hero, mentor gets killed, quippy mercenary, Dark Lord who used to be one of the good guys before he turned, noble lady imprisoned) and spins it in a different direction, making the dark lord and the lady of an age and giving them an intense love/hate relationship, and has Weis' usual religious hang-up and very questionable politics (instead of an Evil Empire, we have an Evil Atheistic Republic where previously there used to be a Not Ideal But God-fearing Monarchy, and our young hero is the destined king and brings back the monarchy, don't you know). Also, she sucks at translating Latin. ("...et cum spirito tuo" doesn't mean "and may his spirit be with you" but "and may (the lord) be with your spirit", woman! After Vatican II gave us mass in our native languages, you have no excuse for not knowing that, if you're using part of a formula that belongs to the responses of the community during Catholic mass) And? I still love those books and cry my heart out over Derek Sagan (that would be the Vader equivalent) and the Lady Maigrey (that would be Leia, if Leia weren't his daughter but his age and if he had this telepathic bond with her and they had betrayed and rescued each other a couple of times and...) every time.
A/V GUILT: Currently? I'm trying to get into The Prisoner and it just doesn't work. I expected to fall for it, given that I like my British tv classics and my surrealism, and several people whose judgment I very much respect are fans, but after three episodes, I'm still just going "well, so?" and "neat use of Portmairion".
MUSICAL GUILT: I have been known to visit Andrew Llyod Webber musicals repeatedly. And to buy the cds for same. And not just the three classics he made with Tim Rice, so...
CELEBRITY GUILT: Here I have to stretch, but... after watching The Queen, I thought: if these were fictional characters instead of real ones, I would so 'ship Elizabeth II/Tony Blair...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 09:40 am (UTC)I liked that this was her teenage Mary Sue fic, and she dug it up 30 years later and put in all the good stuff. But the teenage love is still there, buckets full of it.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 11:22 am (UTC)Isn't it just? In theory, I should be so appalled, but in practice I just love it. OMG Maigrey in her silver armour on that moon...
Fourth Book: what I did appreciate, aside from the Sagan part of it, was that she didn't kill of Astarte or made her unsympathetic, which is an all too common easy way out (see the way Frank Herbert wrote Irulan in Dune Messiah - the tv version did a better job of it - or what Alias did with Lauren Reed).
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 10:19 am (UTC)Doesn't work for me either. J loves it but it leaves me absolutely cold. It just feels to me like a mind-game with no heart or humanity in it.
if these were fictional characters instead of real ones, I would so 'ship Elizabeth II/Tony Blair...
Given the age gap it could be like Elizabeth I/Essex 400 years on. Rash young man keen on military adventures with dour rival waiting in the wings...*g*.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 11:30 am (UTC)That, and, well, after two examples you wonder whether there are ever going to be female characters who either aren't traitorous or are at least supreme in their treachery instead of being someone else's tool....
Given the age gap it could be like Elizabeth I/Essex 400 years on. Rash young man keen on military adventures with dour rival waiting in the wings...*g*.
LOL. Well, true, though I was thinking more Victoria/Lord Melbourne with gender, position and age reversed - rising young star falls for dignified remnant of previous age and does not want to give him/her up in the face of adversity...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 01:33 pm (UTC)whether there are ever going to be female characters who either aren't traitorous or are at least supreme in their treachery
Supreme in their treachery - there's Dance of the Dead which has a very scary female Number Two. There are at least two other episodes which I'm not mentioning unless you're willing for me to give away huge single-ep twists.
But the general tendency of the show is towards misogyny by both genre convention and Patrick McGoohan's rather odd attitudes to women and sex. If you've watched The Chimes of Big Ben, the scene of him with his arm around Nadia had to be shot from behind with his real life daughter as Nadia because he felt that as a married man he shouldn't be that close to a female actor.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 05:19 pm (UTC)If you've watched The Chimes of Big Ben, the scene of him with his arm around Nadia had to be shot from behind with his real life daughter as Nadia because he felt that as a married man he shouldn't be that close to a female actor.
*cleans glasses in Gilesian manner*
Good lord. And speaking of Giles, at least I got to see what Roger Wyndham-Pryce was up to in his younger days.*g*
Female No.2, hm, sounds promising. Well, maybe it'll come to me at a later point...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 09:31 pm (UTC)There aren't any characters who aren't traitorous or tools. Not one. Everyone, absolutely everyone, is a pawn and without moral high ground; the man who thinks that doesn't apply to him, most of all. It's an incredibly bleak view of humanity.
(But if it helps, yes, there is one Servalan-type character later on.) :)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 04:52 pm (UTC)HE WAS MUTTERING ABOUT GRANT MORRISON'S CAT MUFFINS, AND THEN DECIDED TO PURSUE AUTHORIAL SELF-INSERTION. . .omg, that sounds dirty.
What I mean to say is, he was a strange man.
I have never seen anything by ALW, except the movie of Evita, during which I literally fell asleep. In the theater. On the other hand, my high school band once played a medley from "Jesus Christ: Superstar" so i know all the main tunes, but only with madeup words that we inserted to remember the songs.
Umm, yeah, what else. Tolstoi. One of the few world authors I actually have read most of the major works. I like "War & Peace," especially the way old Liev obviously started the book with a huge mancrush on Napoleon, and, by the end, was trying to deny it. The book gets much stodgier and more self-important by the end, but the first third or so -- the battle scene at Austerlitz is amazing virtuoso writing. A lot of his characters are Mary Sue/Gary Stus (either in the way-too-perfect or the self-insert way) and they are usually the ones you want to smack. He writes great self-centered assholes who don't think that they are (Vronsky is my no-good literary boyfriend) and I'm not entirely sure this is intentional. The Kreutzer Sonata is. . .very very strange. It's actually the first thing I read by him and it put me off him for a long time. Yet somehow I ended up reading those two other enormous books anyway.
Finally, I can never think of AK without thinking about Ralph Fiennes in The English Patient: "Madox keeps talking about Anna Karenina. I think it's his idea of a man-to-man chat."
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 04:55 pm (UTC)...
I probably missed the point of that.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 04:15 pm (UTC)I managed to read a number of classics when I was in college, studying in Beijing, since they had all the Penguin Classics editions and I was starved for reading in English, not mandarin. Oddly, most of them were translations: the Tolstoy books and Madame Bovary and the like. I read all of Middlemarch, though, then. Which was only worth it for the last twenty pages, iirc.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 06:27 pm (UTC)And peking duck is still freaking delicious.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 05:52 am (UTC)