Some tales of two writers
Aug. 9th, 2008 05:44 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As the big Blink versus Human Nature showdown at the Hugos approaches, long interviews with Stephen Moffat and Paul Cornell were posted these recent days, and I found both interesting to listen to. Our future Scottish overlord gets quizzed here.
There is the usual American/British culture clash when they keep asking him about the children's show label with the implication that this is something to get over and Moffat is all "family show yay! Of course we write for children, we always have, we always will!", and when asked whether now that there is a sizable American audience the style/writing of the show will change to take said American audience and its viewing habits into consideration reacts with a polite version of ?!?!!!. But it's all good natured. Most of what he says is nothing new if you've been following previous interviews, but it's put in concise form. For example, no, there won't be any depiction of the Time War; he loves the hints RTD kept including as something that fires the imagination of the audience but says any actual depiction would be a let down, pointing to the Gallifreyan scenes in the days of olde (somehow I don't think Moffat is a fan of the Fourth Doctor onwards depiction of Gallifrey and the Time Lords) as a proof why. Something I found both interesting and amusing in the lights of the silly feuding going on in parts of fandom, where "Moffat is sexist!" charges are immediately countered with "Rusty is so much more sexist!" or vice versa (instead of, you know, discussing either gentleman based on his own works instead of the other guys) is what he replies when asked about his favourite characters in New Who. He says that of RTD's characters, he loves Donna best, and Yvonne Hartman, the leader of Torchwood 1, and explains that to him, Yvonne Hartman is a wonderful creation and a great example of a character who is an antagonist but from her perspective a heroine and who indeed tries her best according to her own ethical code. Given that Yvonne usually makes it into the list of characters cited as proof for Rusty having it in for middle-aged women, this neatly illustrated how different one can watch shows. Of his own New Who characters - i.e. Nancy, Jack, Reinette, Sally Sparrow and River Song - he named River as his favourite (definitely not the choice most of the audience would make, again, different view point), which promptly led to questions whether she'd be back (to which he said that while the Doctor will see her again, obviously, he's not sure yet the audience will) and whether she knew Ten or later Doctors (mostly later Doctors, but she has met Ten before, and Moffat also jokes about River running across Eight as well and considering him the dishiest; he's quite nice about Eight in general, saying the tv movie wasn't that bad and Paul McGann was fabulous).
The most interesting thing he says about the Doctor is that in his eyes, the Doctor really doesn't know how old he is anymore, because short of marking each day with a nob in the TARDIS, which he wouldn't be the type for, how would he know? And he wants to address that element in s5 specifically, the different perspective on time of a time traveller, that everyone is equally alive or dead to him.
Paul Cornell's interview can be downloaded here, in which he talks as much about his comics work for Marvel (especially Pete Wisdom) as about his Doctor Who stuff, and reminds me again that most of the writing staff of New Who really are utter and complete fanboys, as he mentions writing his first DW stories for a fanzine. (I'm old enough to remember fanzines and fandom long before the internet. Those were the days, kids.) He also mentions being a Stephen King fan, which doesn't surprise me (I once said Moffat and Cornell are the Thackeray and Dickens of DW, but you could also say they are Peter Straub and Stephen King and make the same point; my third comparison pair would be Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin), during some great discussion about being a writer and how the process of writing works. Asked that if he could create the Eleventh Doctor, how he'd go about it, he suggests - as I think he did in his blog before - Ray Stevenson, based on Stevenson's performance as Titus Pullo in Rome. Not because Eleven should be like Pullo but because Pullo proved that Ray Stevenson can convey a lot of personal warmth, and the juxtaposition of a thuggish exterior with the Doctor's great intellect and with said personal warmth would be, Cornell argued, an interesting new variation of the Doctor. I must say, this is by far the most intriguing casting suggestion I've heard in the Eleven speculation game, but alas Cornell also adds that ideas like this were why he'll never be in charge of the show.
Lastly, a fanfic rec. Two of the fandoms you'd consider least likely to be crossed over with each other are surely Torchwood and C.S. Lewis' Narnia chronicles. Well, Threads that are golden don't break easily pulls it off. In which Captain Jack Harkness recruits Susan Pensieve, who can't go back to Narnia again. Expect some fantastic twists which make sense in both fandoms!
There is the usual American/British culture clash when they keep asking him about the children's show label with the implication that this is something to get over and Moffat is all "family show yay! Of course we write for children, we always have, we always will!", and when asked whether now that there is a sizable American audience the style/writing of the show will change to take said American audience and its viewing habits into consideration reacts with a polite version of ?!?!!!. But it's all good natured. Most of what he says is nothing new if you've been following previous interviews, but it's put in concise form. For example, no, there won't be any depiction of the Time War; he loves the hints RTD kept including as something that fires the imagination of the audience but says any actual depiction would be a let down, pointing to the Gallifreyan scenes in the days of olde (somehow I don't think Moffat is a fan of the Fourth Doctor onwards depiction of Gallifrey and the Time Lords) as a proof why. Something I found both interesting and amusing in the lights of the silly feuding going on in parts of fandom, where "Moffat is sexist!" charges are immediately countered with "Rusty is so much more sexist!" or vice versa (instead of, you know, discussing either gentleman based on his own works instead of the other guys) is what he replies when asked about his favourite characters in New Who. He says that of RTD's characters, he loves Donna best, and Yvonne Hartman, the leader of Torchwood 1, and explains that to him, Yvonne Hartman is a wonderful creation and a great example of a character who is an antagonist but from her perspective a heroine and who indeed tries her best according to her own ethical code. Given that Yvonne usually makes it into the list of characters cited as proof for Rusty having it in for middle-aged women, this neatly illustrated how different one can watch shows. Of his own New Who characters - i.e. Nancy, Jack, Reinette, Sally Sparrow and River Song - he named River as his favourite (definitely not the choice most of the audience would make, again, different view point), which promptly led to questions whether she'd be back (to which he said that while the Doctor will see her again, obviously, he's not sure yet the audience will) and whether she knew Ten or later Doctors (mostly later Doctors, but she has met Ten before, and Moffat also jokes about River running across Eight as well and considering him the dishiest; he's quite nice about Eight in general, saying the tv movie wasn't that bad and Paul McGann was fabulous).
The most interesting thing he says about the Doctor is that in his eyes, the Doctor really doesn't know how old he is anymore, because short of marking each day with a nob in the TARDIS, which he wouldn't be the type for, how would he know? And he wants to address that element in s5 specifically, the different perspective on time of a time traveller, that everyone is equally alive or dead to him.
Paul Cornell's interview can be downloaded here, in which he talks as much about his comics work for Marvel (especially Pete Wisdom) as about his Doctor Who stuff, and reminds me again that most of the writing staff of New Who really are utter and complete fanboys, as he mentions writing his first DW stories for a fanzine. (I'm old enough to remember fanzines and fandom long before the internet. Those were the days, kids.) He also mentions being a Stephen King fan, which doesn't surprise me (I once said Moffat and Cornell are the Thackeray and Dickens of DW, but you could also say they are Peter Straub and Stephen King and make the same point; my third comparison pair would be Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin), during some great discussion about being a writer and how the process of writing works. Asked that if he could create the Eleventh Doctor, how he'd go about it, he suggests - as I think he did in his blog before - Ray Stevenson, based on Stevenson's performance as Titus Pullo in Rome. Not because Eleven should be like Pullo but because Pullo proved that Ray Stevenson can convey a lot of personal warmth, and the juxtaposition of a thuggish exterior with the Doctor's great intellect and with said personal warmth would be, Cornell argued, an interesting new variation of the Doctor. I must say, this is by far the most intriguing casting suggestion I've heard in the Eleven speculation game, but alas Cornell also adds that ideas like this were why he'll never be in charge of the show.
Lastly, a fanfic rec. Two of the fandoms you'd consider least likely to be crossed over with each other are surely Torchwood and C.S. Lewis' Narnia chronicles. Well, Threads that are golden don't break easily pulls it off. In which Captain Jack Harkness recruits Susan Pensieve, who can't go back to Narnia again. Expect some fantastic twists which make sense in both fandoms!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 04:46 pm (UTC)because Pullo proved that Ray Stevenson can convey a lot of personal warmth
I really am the only one who hated that character, right? I mean, I could totally imagine Stevenson as Eleven, and of the suggestions so far, I'd certainly prefer him over Nesbitt and that 20something kid whose name I can't remember, but Pullo is not who I envision when thinking of personal warmth.
Also? Eight is *totally* the dishiest. And that's not my completely irrational affection for Paul McGann talking...
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 05:00 pm (UTC)I think Eight probably wins that competition in most polls.*g*
*uses utterly random new icon*
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 05:08 pm (UTC)Well, given my usual track record with genuinely beloved characters, that's got to be a first. Finally, I have an entry for that Unpopular Opinions in Fandom meme.
*uses utterly random new icon*
*duely admires*
(I must really continue watching Three's adventures on Youknowwhere. They are so adorable. I recently saw Sarah Jane's first one! Does she ever meet the Brig?)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 05:25 pm (UTC)(Personally, I like Pullo, but Vorenus the difficult interests me more, plus of course I have a soft spot for those scheming Roman aristocrats.)
Sarah Jane meets the Brig quite a lot. Invasion of the Dinosaurs, which is her second adventure with Three, has quite a lot of UNIT stuff (and the "Three drags the Brig in a closet" scene the other icon is from) and is wonderful all around. But isn't the Brig actually the one to introduce her to "Dr. John Smith" at the start of The Time Warrior to begin with? Be that as it may, they definitely interact in Invasion of the Dinosaurs.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:43 pm (UTC)I think he introduced the loopy scientist, but I could be wrong, it's been a while. Dinosaurs, huh? Awesome.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 07:07 pm (UTC)geek out aboutfind out why on earth they ended in this time, and the Brigadier's reaction to this is just so very him. Meanwhile, Sarah Jane, being a good reporter, has the right idea to follow the money (necessary to finance machines that produce dinosaurs from the wrong time). You must watch it!no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 10:01 pm (UTC)Mind you, I think fans of Mike Yates probably have cause to complain about the former. We never really saw anything that convinced me he was capable of that.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 04:25 am (UTC)As for whether or not this was ooc for him: I would say we didn't see enough previously to know whether or not he harboured an inner radical revolutionary just begging to be awakened, because I don't recall conversations about his views. But as these were the 70s, they might have gone for an RAF parallel (that's Rote Armee Fraktion, not Royal Air Force), to people like Ulrike Meinhof and Gudrun Ensslin, as one of the most common reactions was "but with their background, who'd have thought?")
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:14 pm (UTC)I gave up halfway through the first season, so people occasionally try to persuade me it got more interesting later.
My One True Candidate for the Eleventh Doctor is Paterson Joseph, as per the icon. I seem to remember Neil Gaiman agrees with me!
ETA: And as I wrote that, Gaiman appeared in icons downpage! It's a sign!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:59 pm (UTC)(Wouldn't know about Jekyll, though, because I only saw the pilot.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 10:11 am (UTC)Fell asleep during a BBC Four Worlds of Fantasy documentary in the early hours of this morning, and woke up to see the Marquis of Carabas striding towards me. An even better sign! Perhaps I should write to Moffat.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 02:32 pm (UTC)But I'm very flattered you would have wanted to read them.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:26 pm (UTC)I gave up halfway through the first season, so people occasionally try to persuade me it got more interesting later.
Funnily enough, both are true for me as well!
Paterson Joseph: looks like a very good choice indeed. Much approval.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 05:20 pm (UTC)interivews both sound great, so thanks you for linking them :)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 05:28 pm (UTC)Eight: meets companions of other incarnations who rip his clothes off ALL THE TIME, clearly. (There is that precedence with Bernice Summerfield...)
*uses shiny new icon with you as well, though it has nothing to do with the subject*
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 07:05 pm (UTC)and at least eight is one of the ones who does the kissing thing. companions trying to rip five's clothes off him would undoubtedly be hilarious.
also, having watched the moffatt video i report back saying moffatt is one of life's most charmingly dorky men. i love his talk about being the best boy in the world, and explanation of how the clone wars were really rubbish, though - alas, no time war. i do wish we could see it though i know it's wrong and it would be just as disappointing as thousands of new zealand men marching around killing thousands of robots.
good completely irrelvent icon btw. i have no idea what's going on in it though... is three telling the brig a story of murder and intrigue?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 07:19 pm (UTC)and at least eight is one of the ones who does the kissing thing. companions trying to rip five's clothes off him would undoubtedly be hilarious.
It's the one thing that never happened to Five when everything else did. OR MAYBE IT DID HAPPEN. In 100, there is a scene in Paul Cornell's 100 days of the Doctor where Six and Evelyn, unnoticed, observe Five, Evelyn comments he looks like a pretty young man, and Six somewhat sorely replies "everyone always says that. You have no idea what it was like, being him".
Completely irrelevant icon: actually, Three has just dragged the Brig into a tiny dark closet and tells the Brig just to trust him. Yes, you read that right. It's one of many adorable scenes in Invasion of the Dinosaurs. At this point, everyone thinks the Doctor is nuts (again), but the Brig investigates with him the sinister goings-on in an abandoned part of a goverment building anyway. This is nothing to later, when Three insists on driving the two of them right under the belly of a T-Rex.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 07:38 pm (UTC)that's so wonderful i want to go out and buy 100 right now
maybe i will just trawl the internet.... not that i would do thatit probably was continually trying to be five - please stop trying to hug me, please. i don't want to be hugged!and why does the brig/unit always think the doctor's nuts? he's always right. it's like when scully says 'don't be silly mulder, there's no such thing as aliens'. what about all those times it was aliens, scully/brig? there were lots of those times.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 08:02 am (UTC)(I'm not as fond of The Daemons as most people are, but it contains a scene which is typical for the Doctor's attitude re: Brig.
Doctor: argues with Brig on the phone, complete with bickering about military narrow mindedness
Jo: makes critical remark about Brig once the Doctor has hung up
Doctor *complete turnaround*: "The Brigadier is trying to do an incredibly difficult job under terrible circumstances, Jo. Show a little respect.")
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-11 04:06 pm (UTC)also, i apologise to you and the brigadier for my horrific and unfair generalisation viz. his willingness to believe the doctor. you're right (though i haven't seen dinosaurs, so here i am just assuming you are not lying),
and i'm very meh-ed by the daemons actually, despite the amusement that is three tied to a maypole and pretending to be a wizard. but why do the doctor and the master hardly speak? why are the master's robes so unnecessarily embarrassing? why does he feel the need to disguise himself with a pair of glasses when no one knows who he is apart from the doctor/UNIT who would surely see through even a disguise as cunning as that? i do not know the answers to these things.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-11 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:10 pm (UTC)"Overarching goal? There's no overarching goal to Doctor Who, other than to write 45 minutes of awesome every Saturday."
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 10:06 am (UTC)PS Love the Doctor's volte-face on the Brigadier. That's so John "No one but me can be rude about Paul" Lennon!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 12:16 pm (UTC)That's so John "No one but me can be rude about Paul" Lennon!
Bwahahahaa. It truly is, though now that you've cast the Doctor as John and the Brig as Paul, I have to ask whether this makes Benton Ringo and Liz Shaw George?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 03:51 pm (UTC)Then, Jo & Sarah Jane as Cynthia & Yoko?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:26 pm (UTC)That's interesting. I was watching the ep with Anthony Stewart Head in it last night as the school head master, and at one point it shows a sign above the school that says - Welcome to High School. Which confused me since I didn't think they called it that in the UK.
He says that of RTD's characters, he loves Donna best
Me too! :)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 06:39 pm (UTC)I suspect the term has re-entered UK consciousness through saturation in American teen television. I've heard that some schools have started having proms now.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-09 11:38 pm (UTC)I knew about his aversion to Gallifrey, but it still makes me sad - sometimes I feel quite alone in always liking it. (Well, in a 'grim fascination' sort of way.) I've seen people complain the Time Lords were reduced, as time went on, but - well, I rather liked that. I want real societies, not just epic legends. It's similar to why I hate the 'Lonely God' thing, I suppose.
As for Yvonne - again, concept vs execution, I think. A lot of villains think they're right - give us a reason to think that a little, too.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-10 09:36 am (UTC)(BTW, arguably this started in Seven's era, because Andrew Cartmel was way more into re-mythologizing and re-alien-izing the Doctor than RTD ever was, what with "The Other" this, Merlin that, and pointedly no other Time Lords but the Master in one single serial showing up. But New Who took another route, the blowing up Gallifrey one, which I still think was one of the best decisions ever when it came to relaunching the show and simultanously making it accessible for people unaware of the previous continuity AND the fans familiar with it.)
I'd also argue that the Time Lords and Gallifrey are still presented as flawed in New Who, only you have to pay more attention because of the Doctor's survivor's guilt to notice. But it's there. Vide "your people always struck me as passive to the point of indolence" in School Reunion, "they (i.e. the Time Lords, and given what we know about the Raccnoss disappearing around the creation of Earth, presumably the pre-Rassilon ones) murdered the Raccnoss" in "Runaway Bride", and of course Sound of Drums with "it all sounds so beautiful" (Jack re: Gallifrey) and the Doctor replying "oh, it was - beautiful to look at" and then getting into his facing the vortex at eight "some get inspired, some go mad, some run away" story, which hardly paints Gallifrey as a nice utopia and more as harsh, and well, very alien.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-11 05:26 pm (UTC)(Honestly I hate Cartmel's Master Plan with the fire of a thousand suns, but I do like that no one ever forgot that the Doctor was an alien. I'd just rather he was...'just' an alien, not, well, the Other.
LOOOOMS.And Nine's 'turn of the Earth' speech was bloody amazing, yes.)As for Gallifrey's destruction - I'd like it more if they explored more of its affect on the universe, instead of just pointing to the Time War whenever it's convenient. And while I did enjoy it with Nine - partially, I'm sure, because he was my first - I think it's got a tad stale by now. I'm tired of the angst, frankly. And, were Gallifrey ever to appear again, it could easily be reimagined. (I also miss the Doctor being a rebel, a renegade, rather than 'the highest authority'.)
I think it would help if those who criticised the Time Lords...weren't villains? And yes, they destroyed the Racnoss, but then...so did the Doctor. So unless you already know how screwed up Gallifrey was, I don't think you get much from it. The Sound of Drums did help, though. Especially the ritual traumatising of children.
...Wow, that got...long and rambly, sorry.