Here we go again (sigh)
Dec. 10th, 2008 04:42 pmThe Sarah Connor Chronicles review will have to wait a little, due to rl Christmas mail related business (yes, still) and being on the move again, but:
Washington Post article about the irritating (not to mention homophobic) notion that "a gay kissing scene must be the worst Hollywood job hazard that a male actor could face, including stunt work, extreme weather or sitting through five hours of special-effects makeup every day". Good for James Franco for refusing to play along, boo, hiss on Letterman, and on Chris Potter (one more reason not to watch the American Queer as Folk - I can't imagine any of the actors involved in the English original saying something as spectacularly dumb as what Potter is quoted saying in that article.
(My favourite reply to the whole "isn't it a trial to play a gay character?" rigmarole still comes from Patrick Stewart, who was asked this when playing a gay supporting character in Jeffrey, a film he shot soon after TNG had ended, and basically went "are you serious?" on the reporter, saying he had played two men so jealous they kill their wives (or try to, one case), Leontes and Othello, and one man who wants to cut out another man's heart (Shylock), and how is it that playing a nice interior decorator is supposed to be a stretch?)
Washington Post article about the irritating (not to mention homophobic) notion that "a gay kissing scene must be the worst Hollywood job hazard that a male actor could face, including stunt work, extreme weather or sitting through five hours of special-effects makeup every day". Good for James Franco for refusing to play along, boo, hiss on Letterman, and on Chris Potter (one more reason not to watch the American Queer as Folk - I can't imagine any of the actors involved in the English original saying something as spectacularly dumb as what Potter is quoted saying in that article.
(My favourite reply to the whole "isn't it a trial to play a gay character?" rigmarole still comes from Patrick Stewart, who was asked this when playing a gay supporting character in Jeffrey, a film he shot soon after TNG had ended, and basically went "are you serious?" on the reporter, saying he had played two men so jealous they kill their wives (or try to, one case), Leontes and Othello, and one man who wants to cut out another man's heart (Shylock), and how is it that playing a nice interior decorator is supposed to be a stretch?)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 05:05 pm (UTC)Regarding female on female as opposed to male on male kissing: what the article either didn't realize or decided not to pursue is of course that this isn't regarded as more positive because actresses are a more enlightened species, but because it's both less threatening and usually portrayed as sexually titillating to heterosexual males. Hooray for patriarchical double standards.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:57 pm (UTC)Re: Potter - you'd think if he was that averse to playing m/m love scenes, he wouldn't pick this role to begin with, but even if he simply really needed the pay check, professional ethics should tell him this kind of statement isn't okay...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 08:46 am (UTC)Absolutely, though there are actors who will push past that, knowing that they will not be frowned upon in most circles for remarks like this. It makes me hate the industry, since that really should have changed by now (shouldn't the arts be a more liberal environment, anyway?), but also the single players. Thank god for people like Stewart!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 11:38 am (UTC)To go back to Potter the idiot, though, the only comparable tasteless and not homophobic remark I can think of is Tony Curtis saying "kissing Marilyn was like kissing Hitler". And he did get smacked down for that one. (Though whether he would have if she hadn't died soon after is up to debate.)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 07:27 pm (UTC)Good for Patrick Stewart. He brings some much-needed perspective to the table.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:28 pm (UTC)Yet another reason why Patrick Stewart is simply awesome.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:54 pm (UTC)Honestly, before I saw the American QAF I never could imagine loving it as much as the British one, but it ended up surpassing it in many, many ways.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 11:45 pm (UTC)PS
Date: 2008-12-10 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 01:38 am (UTC)As everyone else has noted already, Patrick Stewart = awesome. One would hope that being attracted to someone of the same gender would be less of a stretch for most actors than, say, being a serial killer. And surely it should be easier to play a person of a different orientation than it is to play an ancient vampire or an immortal pirate or an alien or what have you.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 11:49 am (UTC)On the awesomeness of Patrick Stewart, here's a quote for you you're probably familiar with, also from an interview given not a year after TNG had ended:
Q: Some people have thought Q was gay.
A: I did. Again, I would say this was an impression given you entirely by the quality of the performances rather than by anything that was deliberately placed in the script.[Laughs] John [de Lancie], whose work was brilliant on the show, had a kind of boldness about him, a way of looking at Picard that was provocative. And yes, there was the scene in the bed - although we didn't make that up. That was written, so we've got to commend the writers for that.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-11 11:24 am (UTC)