Back from the cinema
Jan. 14th, 2004 05:24 pmI went and saw Lost in Translation, which is lovely. As someone who travels quite a lot and has had her share of jet leg, strange television and the odd encounter with countrymen and -women one either finds totally embarrassing or regards as instant soulmates, there was quite a lot to identify with. Then there's the tenderness the film has for its two main characters, and the restraint. I really appreciate they never have sex with each other. The image of the two of them finally falling asleep, with his hand on her bare foot, is more touching than the usual montage of actors faking sexual ecstasy would ever have been.
Bill Murray and Scarlett Johannsen are great in their parts, and I take it nobody is accusing Sofia Coppola of benefiting from nepotism anymore. The film has its very own style, not derivative of either her father's nor anyone elses visuals, and a dry sense of humour, too. (I don't think a male director could have resisted filming the strip club scene as sexy instead of going for the sheer flabbergasting bizarreness.) Kelly the action movie star looked like a Cameron Diaz clone, but was probably intended to be a generic sample. And I'm trying to think of the last movie that used phone calls as effectively (Mystic River tried to, but that particular subplot - about Kevin Bacon - didn't quite match the others) - they tell you all you need to know about the state of Bob's marriage, and his life.
Moreover,
bimo's package arrived. Now I will have to quiet my inner revolutionary in order to appreciate another version of that arch-reactionary tale, The Scarlet Pimpernel. But hey, Ian McKellen!
Icon courtesy of
jidabug. Speaking of icons, the silliness of two days ago taught me that there is a market for B5/BTVS amalgan icons, specifically one We are all Giles icon, and one Only one vampire ever managed to defeat the Slayers. He is behind me. You are in front of me. If you value your lives, be elsewhere icon. Does anyone feel creative?
Bill Murray and Scarlett Johannsen are great in their parts, and I take it nobody is accusing Sofia Coppola of benefiting from nepotism anymore. The film has its very own style, not derivative of either her father's nor anyone elses visuals, and a dry sense of humour, too. (I don't think a male director could have resisted filming the strip club scene as sexy instead of going for the sheer flabbergasting bizarreness.) Kelly the action movie star looked like a Cameron Diaz clone, but was probably intended to be a generic sample. And I'm trying to think of the last movie that used phone calls as effectively (Mystic River tried to, but that particular subplot - about Kevin Bacon - didn't quite match the others) - they tell you all you need to know about the state of Bob's marriage, and his life.
Moreover,
Icon courtesy of
no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 08:05 am (UTC)(Please. Please.)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 08:21 am (UTC)More later.*g*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 08:41 am (UTC)As for Lost in Translation, I agree with all of your observations. I hope to see both actors honored with nominations come Oscar time for their delicate performances. The gentleness between the two of them in bed spoke far more about their relationship then thrashing around in bed ever would have.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 09:50 am (UTC)"Delicate" is an excellent description of the performances in Lost in Translation. The actors killed me with their facial expressions and body language, which were eloquent in a way I don't think words could have been. I suppose that fits in with the final scene, where we never hear what he says to her, and yet it's perfect, and feels like great relief and closure.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 11:13 am (UTC)I suppose that fits in with the final scene, where we never hear what he says to her, and yet it's perfect, and feels like great relief and closure.
I hadn't thought about it in those terms, but I agree with you. I recall not needing to hear exactly what was said because, taking into consideration the words and actions proceeding that moment, I was able to fill in the blanks for myself.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 06:44 pm (UTC)Rumor has it...
Date: 2004-01-14 08:10 am (UTC)But, of course, this is all rumor.
Re: Rumor has it...
Date: 2004-01-14 08:36 am (UTC)At least, this is what's rumoured.
I now blame you...
Date: 2004-01-14 08:58 am (UTC)Seriously: hm. Scarlett Johannson had some of the mannerisms I recall from The Godfather III. (BTW, never understood the critics going out of their way to bash Sofia Coppola's performance in it. She was neither great nor horrible, but then Mary Corleone as written didn't call for a great range.)
Re: I now blame you...
Date: 2004-01-14 09:11 am (UTC)And I'm hetero.
It is interesting gossip, isn't it? Oddly, it doesn't alter my feeling for the film a bit, which isn't usually the case with these sorts of things.
I think critics just savaged her performance in Godfather III because they could, because they wouldn't take on Coppola himself, so they they slammed him by proxy.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-14 08:54 am (UTC)