Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (Companions - Kathyh)
Trickier to answer then you'd think, because presumably the phrasing excludes all roughly human-shaped aliens and robots. I wonder about John Henry from The Sarah Connor Chronicles. It would probably be cheating to include him, for despite him being actually in the form of several boxes, it's the human-shaped extension and the actor of same who sells us on John Henry as someone to care for.) Similarly, someone like Chewbacca from Star Wars or Novice Hame or Brannigan from Doctor Who would be out because despite being covered by fur from head to foot, they come in human size and shape. So, let's see, beloved characters who really don't appear in human form.

1) Pilot from Farscape. Aka the one everyone is thinking of when they tell Farscape sceptics "the muppets will make you cry". Gentle, occasionally snarky, with as much tragedy in his life as any of the human-shaped characters. Pilot is immensely huggable (complicated by the fact he has a lot of limbs), and that's a fact.

2) Rygel from Farscape. As if I'd leave my beloved Dominar out. Rygel is Pilot's opposite, starting with the fact he's probably the oldest character on the show until Noranti in s4 (and Pilot is very much a teenager for his species, though we don't have confirmation of that fact until s2). He's greedy, eternally hungry, very shrewd, great at negotiations, actually very dangerous if you underestimate him due to size, and over the course of the show finds himself starting to care for certain people despite himself.

3) Matthew from Sandman. A borderline case as he used to be human before dying and becoming a raven in the Dreaming, but that's his Swamp Thing backstory before Sandman starts, and we never see Matthew as anything but a raven in Sandman (and wouldn't know he once was human if not for two or three lines of dialogue in ten volumes), plus the saga makes the point that his form is also his nature now when he finds himself feasting raven-style. Hence I say he counts. Matthew is one of my all time favourite sidekicks as well, no-nonsense, loyal but asking questions anyway if he doesn't understand something, and putting up with a lot from having to yell driving instructions at Delirium to being sent out in tandem with a serial killer with teeth for eyes.

4) The cat from Coraline. It's very evident from his works - both comics and novels - that Neil Gaiman likes cats (and cat godesses), and my favourite of his cats is the one from Coraline. The cat - who refuses to be called by a human name ("I know who I am") - is the one ally Coraline has (in the novel; the fact this is changed for the film makes for a somewhat different story), and so very, very feline both when silent and when speaking. No one's sidekick, I'd call it Coraline's occasional companion - when it chooses to be.

5) Fuchur the luck dragon from The Never-Ending Story (again, book, not film; the design for Fuchur was one of the many things Michael Ende disliked about the movie, because the description for Fuchur in the novel is pretty definite - think Chinese style dragon). Fuchur was the first friendly dragon I encountered in fiction as a child, and no less impressive or awesome for this; when Atreyu finds Fuchur escaped Ygrammul's net along with himself I was so relieved like you wouldn't believe. Fuchur is still my favourite dragon, come to think of it.
selenak: (Library - Kathyh)
Friday cause of inappropriate amusement: I've stumbled across three posts now which complain that Hollywood plans to film The Never-Ending Story again and call this a desecration of "the original film/movie". Why does this amuse me? Well, because Michael Ende, the author of the original novel, which happens to be one of my favourite novels full stop, hated that movie. And when I use the term "hate" I do not speak in lj hyperbole. He was absolutely horrified by it, raged in every interview he gave after seeing that film about how it managed to get the characters wrong, the themes, and how it completely cheapened and hollywoodized (his term) everything. He cursed the director and the producer (Peterson & Eichinger, respectively), he hated the set design and the way the creatures looked (especially the dragon, because he had been rather specific in his descriptions of Fuchur; second in his authorial ire came the palace of the Child-Like Empress and the Child-like Empress herself - "they made that poor girl look like as if she was in an American beauty pageant"), and his editor at the time, Roman Hocke, told me how rage about the movie contributed to Ende's failing health. He didn't quite blame it for Ende's death, but you get the general tendency.

Now, given this, I can't quite decide whether our late author upon hearing this news would react with "not again" or "revenge at last!"

Personally? As a reader of the novel who was a teenager by the time it was filmed, I found the movie mildly disappointing, both because Bastian Balthasar Bux wasn't the fat bespectacled boy described but your avarage thin good looking movie kid, and Atreyu didn't have green skin, but most of all because it only covered half of the novel. But there were sequences that worked for me, and on the whole, I didn't come out raging, I just never felt a need to watch it again. The radio production, btw, was superbly done, by contrast. Now I rather doubt a new film version will be closer to the book, though I might be wrong here, but I certainly don't feel it would be sacrilege. The book already made it through the first film and two sequels who looked horrid even in the trailers, which is why I didn't watch them. So another film version really doesn't make a difference. They do it to Jane Austen all the time.

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 01:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios