In The SIlkworm, JKR went baroque and Jacobean with the murder of the case, and accordingly all chapters were headed by a John Webster (and friends) quote. In Career of Evil, where the backstory of Strike’s dead mother, the rock music groupie, is pretty important, the quotes came from Blue Öyster Cult lyrics. This time around, it’s Ibsen’s turn, and if you know your Scandinavian playwrights, you know, with a sinking heart, what this signifies - bad marriages (or bad love affairs) are a big theme of the tale. On the bright side, I hasten to add, the Strike/Robin partnership is in fine shape, both professionally and emotionally, after fallout from the last volume at the start of the novel. And since said partnership is the core of what makes this series of novels, that is the most important thing.
But to get my bad marriages/affairs nitpicks out first: ( which are spoilery. )
All of which, btw, doesn’t mean that various of the depictions of bad relationships didn’t ring true to me. “You can bloody hate someone and still wish they gave a shit about you, and hate yourself for wishing it” one of the suspects tells Robin, which is true for a great many of the novel’s cast, and struck me as a key quote. As for the case(s) of the novel which our investigative team has to crack, one starts when an off-his-meds homeless man shows up at their office and tells Strike about witnessing a murder as a child (which, because he’s clearly mentally ill, means he may or may not have imagined it), the other with a Tory politician, Jasper Chiswell, being blackmailed and in turn wanting to get dirt on his opponent. This provides the opportunity for Robin to go undercover not once but twice in very different roles, which mostly is great fun to read about, and for the author to do what she did in “Cuckoo’s Calling” for the fashion world and in “The Silkworm” for the literary industry, to go satirical about a certain milieu: politics, privileged Tory families and the radical left. The first two work out well (for example, Robin’s acid observation on what the various members of the (Tory) Chiswell clan think of as “poor”), but with the last, I feel it shows that JKR has been spending the last two years or so involved in an inner Labour dispute between Corbynists and, for lack of a better term, Social Democrats in the Labour party, and not on the pro-Corbyn side. Because if one of the supporting villains is a beardy charismatic guy having a cult like grip on his followers while he’s spouting pseudo Marxist clichés which include the occasional antisemitic remark, with an anti-Zionist poster prominently displayed in the locations where he holds a speech, it’s probably not out of this world to suspect someone might be fictionally venting. This unfortunately means the satire is less than successful, because in addition to everything else, the character in question is also a hypocrite, exploiting other people. Letting him have the courage of his convictions would have made for a far more interesting literary creation. (In this very novel, she does better with the actual murderer, who doesn’t have a red arrow saying “dislike this person” pointing at them all the time, and with some of the other supporting cast, including Chiswell’s daughter Izzy, who is clueless about privilege in the most breathtaking way without being malicious, or Chiswell’s political enemy Della who needs to come across as ambigous since what her motives are and how much she knows is one of the mysteries facing Strike and Robin.
This being said, the maybe Corbyn avatar is just a minor villain and doesn’t show up that often, especially in the second half of the novel. And, again, there is great teamwork. Given that the second novel features a major argument between our heroes and the third much plot interference, I can’t tell how how I relieved I was that in this one, after the early holding hack, they get along fine, and as in the first one you can see them bringing out each other’s strengths while having a great rapport, and share many a scene. Most importantly (to me), in the majority of said scenes, they’re comfortable with each other. In a novel which inflicts private drama on either otherwise, this is a much needed relief.
In conclusion: won’t be my favourite of the lot but I’ll probably reread it in some years, skipping over most of the stuff with SPOILER. And celebrate that SPOILER won’t plague us in future novels anymore.
But to get my bad marriages/affairs nitpicks out first: ( which are spoilery. )
All of which, btw, doesn’t mean that various of the depictions of bad relationships didn’t ring true to me. “You can bloody hate someone and still wish they gave a shit about you, and hate yourself for wishing it” one of the suspects tells Robin, which is true for a great many of the novel’s cast, and struck me as a key quote. As for the case(s) of the novel which our investigative team has to crack, one starts when an off-his-meds homeless man shows up at their office and tells Strike about witnessing a murder as a child (which, because he’s clearly mentally ill, means he may or may not have imagined it), the other with a Tory politician, Jasper Chiswell, being blackmailed and in turn wanting to get dirt on his opponent. This provides the opportunity for Robin to go undercover not once but twice in very different roles, which mostly is great fun to read about, and for the author to do what she did in “Cuckoo’s Calling” for the fashion world and in “The Silkworm” for the literary industry, to go satirical about a certain milieu: politics, privileged Tory families and the radical left. The first two work out well (for example, Robin’s acid observation on what the various members of the (Tory) Chiswell clan think of as “poor”), but with the last, I feel it shows that JKR has been spending the last two years or so involved in an inner Labour dispute between Corbynists and, for lack of a better term, Social Democrats in the Labour party, and not on the pro-Corbyn side. Because if one of the supporting villains is a beardy charismatic guy having a cult like grip on his followers while he’s spouting pseudo Marxist clichés which include the occasional antisemitic remark, with an anti-Zionist poster prominently displayed in the locations where he holds a speech, it’s probably not out of this world to suspect someone might be fictionally venting. This unfortunately means the satire is less than successful, because in addition to everything else, the character in question is also a hypocrite, exploiting other people. Letting him have the courage of his convictions would have made for a far more interesting literary creation. (In this very novel, she does better with the actual murderer, who doesn’t have a red arrow saying “dislike this person” pointing at them all the time, and with some of the other supporting cast, including Chiswell’s daughter Izzy, who is clueless about privilege in the most breathtaking way without being malicious, or Chiswell’s political enemy Della who needs to come across as ambigous since what her motives are and how much she knows is one of the mysteries facing Strike and Robin.
This being said, the maybe Corbyn avatar is just a minor villain and doesn’t show up that often, especially in the second half of the novel. And, again, there is great teamwork. Given that the second novel features a major argument between our heroes and the third much plot interference, I can’t tell how how I relieved I was that in this one, after the early holding hack, they get along fine, and as in the first one you can see them bringing out each other’s strengths while having a great rapport, and share many a scene. Most importantly (to me), in the majority of said scenes, they’re comfortable with each other. In a novel which inflicts private drama on either otherwise, this is a much needed relief.
In conclusion: won’t be my favourite of the lot but I’ll probably reread it in some years, skipping over most of the stuff with SPOILER. And celebrate that SPOILER won’t plague us in future novels anymore.