Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (M)
One of the advantages of not being on the road but in one's place of residence: Munich offers one of those cinemas where they occasionally show live broadcasts of British theatre. Such as, last night, The National Theatre's 50th anniversary celebration, which was rather splendid, and great fun to watch on the big screen. As awesome as all the performances were (and btw, must check out that Brenton/Hare play about Rupert Murdoch), both the funny and the tragic, not to mention the musical (Judi Dench: still a goddess), here's what got the biggest laugh in a Munich cinema: during the introduction about the history of the NT, there is this news clip of Laurence Olivier, asked whether he's saying that a building for the NT should be prioritized over a new school or hospital, snarking back at the press: "No, I am not saying that. I'm just saying that in Germany, they would be."

(Okay, we did have subsidiized theatre earlier than Britain, but this has been something of a very mixed blessing. Not least because of the Regietheater excesses. Let's just say that while whenever I visit London I watch a play each nicht, I'm very rarely in the theatre in Munich, not because we don't have several but because it's really hard to find one that puts on a production using most of actual play text and not descending into endless gimmicks.)

(Anyway, that's not the only reason why Olivier's line had the audience chuckling, of course. We were aware he was playing on national rivalries there.)

This particular Munich cinema, as I learned yesterday, will also show The Day of the Doctor, aka the big DW 50th anniversary episode, live as the BBC broadcasts it on November 23rd, and hence I bought a ticket - they only announced that German cinemas would be included in the world wide broadcast yesterday morning, and by evening most of the tickets had already been sold out, which shows you Doctor Who has a lot of German fans, too. So I shall see The Day of the Doctor on the big screen as it happens, surrounded by fellow fans. Even if the Moff doesn't come through with the script, this should make it a great experience.


***

Rewatching Breaking Bad's third season would be compelling under any circumstances, but it's especially fascinating if you do so relatively shortly after the finale, because that's where so many paths took their crucial turn. Also, despite me marathoning the first four seasons during the s4/s5 hiatus, i.e. not that long ago, it turns out I had forgotten some important stuff, for example: cut for spoilers because of potential BB newbies. ) It's just such a rich, rewarding show that deserves all the awards it ever got and then some. Golden age of tv indeed.

***

When you suddenly start to get kudos and comments on an old story, it stands to reason that someone must have reccomended somewhere, and after some digging, I found out this was indeed the case of my DS9 tale Abraham's Son, which made the grade here. Cue a very pleased author I. I loved Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, but I did have some issues with it, too, and this story was inspired by a big one, so I'm thrilled when it still speaks to people.

****

And lastly, some months ago I linked to that John-Lennon-parodies-Bob-Dylan post of hilarity; the 60s crowd did that kind of thing a lot while also digging each other's music. Here's another example, Keith Richards and Mick Jagger in 1965 whiling the hours away while having a go at Beatles hits, I've just seen a face and Eight Days A Week specifically. (Keith can't sing, but that's not the point. :)

In haste

Aug. 1st, 2013 04:24 pm
selenak: (Family Matters by Marciaelena)
Darth Real Life is battling me, which is why I'm still behind with the replies etc, but have two links:

Angel:

Why We Fight: An Essay on Truth and Purpose: meta on the season 5 episode Why We Fight in the broader context of the show. Why We Fight is unpopular in the fandom when last I looked, but I always liked it - it does some genuinenly original things with its WWII setting, for starters, and it contains one of my favourite scenes between Angel and Spike. (Spike, in conclusion to Lawson's fate and the fact Angel just made him swim the rest of the way to the coast: "You really are a dick." Angel, with a gesture that makes it clear Spike will have to swim, too: "Yes, I really am.") This is a very good post that reminds me of ye olde days when there was good AtS meta to be had in addition to BTVS meta.


Breaking Bad and The Other Sixties Band (sort of):

Behold Hank, Jesse and Keith Richards in the same room, here. Okay, the actors and He Who Will Survive The Apocalypse, but come on, this is begging for crack fic. What scenario would bring Jesse Pinkman, Hank Schroeder and Keef together?

And so....

Dec. 20th, 2011 03:54 pm
selenak: (Ray and Shaz by Kathyh)
So Dexter's sixth season has ended, and for me, the show.

A few spoilery observations )

This was once a very good show, with a great character ensemble, and I'll always remember that show with fondness. I won't continue watching it's pale successor anymore. Ah well, it'll free up some icon space.

On the brighter side of things, the beta of my Yuletide story came back, and I posted it, discovering on the occasion there were several stories in the fandom in question posted already for Yuletide (and of course still disguised); this makes me happy and even more looking forward to the reveal. My own story I think will be very easy to guess if you're familiar with my stuff, but then, I thought this last year, and [personal profile] bimo was nice enough to reccomend last year's effort to me before the reveal, which tickled me to no end. :)

Speaking of stories, here's a good one from Harry Potter fandom: For the Greater Good, which fleshes out Dumbledore's friend Elphias Dodge from Deathly Hallows and is a great example of a writer pulling off the trick of getting across things to the reader which the limited pov character does not realise himself. A great portrayal of Dumbledore developing from flashback into Potter era Albus, too.

Also something guaranteed to cheer me up after my Dexter blues: ye olde English musicians from the 60s. Seems Paul McCartney has taken to hanging out more and more with members of The Other Band. Here's Ronnie Wood (he of the Rolling Stones, young padawans) joining him for a rendition of Get Back at a concert two weeks ago:



Sidenote: ever since Keith Richards wrote in his memoirs that the northern guitarists hold their guitars closer and higher than he and his Southern pals, I can't get that out of my head and checked in the vid above, and it's definitely true for Ronnie W. and Paul. Who has also been busy indulging his penchant for classics from the 30s and 40s and will release an album with standards from Arlen, Loesser, Berlin etc. (first I heard of it was from Elvis Costello who mentioned it in an interview, as his wife, Diane Krall, is also on it) in February, plus two new compositions of his own. One of which has just hit the net. It's a lovely melancholy ballad called My Valentine. A bit jazzy, and what Peter Carlin would call an autumnal love song. With Eric Clapton on guitar.



Most annoying comment spotted on the net so far: "a song for grandfathers". You know, first of all, he is a grandfather (turning 70 next year and with six grandchildren so far), and secondly, one of the many reasons why I appreciate the man is that he liked these kind of songs already when he was a teenager, along with rock'n roll. Being a both/and rather than an either/or person myself - meaning I like rock, I like melodious crooning, and I never understood why this should be mutually exclusive anymore than liking, say, DS9 and Babylon 5, TNG and DS9, Spike and Angel, the Third and the Seventh Doctor... you get the picture. So boo to partisans; I'll sit back and enjoy the music.

ETA: I hasten to add there is nothing wrong with simply disliking certain styles of music.(For example, I'm not into techno.) It was the "grandfather" bit I found annoying, as if this was either news or something wrong for a 69 years old to enjoy singing and composing. (Or a 20 years old, for that matter.)
selenak: (JohnPaul by Jennymacca)
[profile] ponygirl2000 kindly pointed this out to me: Chuck Berry's song Brown-eyed Handsome Man as covered by John Lennon on a tape in the late 70s. It's a good cover anyway, but, as Ponygirl says, the thing that pushes it into squee territory is that John randomly mashes it with Get Back, of all the songs. (Thus outranking the tape where he sings Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey on his 31st birthday, but not the clip for Sean sings With a little help from my friends for him, calls it his favourite song and John is glowing in nostalgia about how he and Paul sang back-up for Ringo on that one while simultanously giving interviews denying Sean ever heard a single Beatle tune.)

Speaking of rarities, YouTube has Soily, which was the hard rock number with which Wings used to end their concerts and which was strictly a "live" song, meaning it's not on the regular records except the live "Wings over America" album from 1976. It's a screamer in the tradition of "Long Tall Sally" or "I'm Down" and very handy if someone comes up with the old "Paul only wrote silly love songs in the 70s" cliché.



One thing that I find striking (in a positive way) about the 60s generation of musicians - especially the survivors - is that yes, flawed as hell as people, but how really generous and supportive they were/are of each other, in addition to the more expected competition with each other.

Stories and quotes from and regarding The Who, Brian Wilson, Marianne Faithfull, Bob Dylan and David Bowie )
selenak: (Nina by Kathyh)
Firstly, Judi Dench and Daniel Craig doing a spot about equality. As M and Bond. Sometimes it's hard not to conclude British actors are just cooler. (Must be something in the tea, and all that.)




Secondly, re: Being Human, meta on the whole Annie and Nina versus Mitchell matter which does not make me want to scream in frustration but points out vampire privilege and concepts of justice. (I also liked this review of the last episode broadcast in the UK.)

Thirdly, remember a while back when I quoted from some teen magazine questionairs the Beatles had to reply to in the 60s, with hilarity ensuing? Well, the Stones had to do that, too. Behold young Keith Richards replying. He's both funny ("Favourite Clothes: Mine, Hobbies: Biting my nails") and aw-inducing - "Favourite Composers: Lennon/McCartney, J.S. Bach". Aside from the mutual admiration society (as he calls it in Life) they had going with the other band, I find the Bach naming intriguing, not least because Paul McCartney has been raving about Bach through the ages as well; the piccolo trumpet on Penny Lane was the result of him having watched a broadcast of Bach's 2nd Brandenburg Concerto on tv (he even got the same musician to play the piccolo trumpet). And he said re: the melodic origins of Blackbird: The original inspiration was from a well-known piece by Bach, which I never know the title of, which George and I had learned to play at early age; he better than me actually. Part of its structure is a particular harmonic thing between the melody and the bass line which intrigued me. Bach was always one of our favourite composers; we felt we had a lot in common with him. For some reason we thought his music was very similar to ours and we latched on to him amazingly quickly. We also liked the stories of him being the church organist and wopping this stuff out weekly, which was rather similar to what we were doing. We were very pleased to hear that.

In conclusion, Bach = soulmate of 60s British rock musicians? And here you'd think it would have been Händel. :)
selenak: (Guinevere by Reroutedreams)
A quote I didn't include among my collection of contradictory John Lennon quotes, mostly because it's more of a JohnandYoko contradictory issue, not a statement, but it's a little gem nonetheless: on page 224 of her memoirs, May Pang, who, remember, worked for both Yoko and John for two years at the start of the 70s before becoming John's girlfriend, informs us: Wives and girlfriends were not welcome at John's sessions. Yoko had said, 'The studio is a place to work.' The result of her dictum had been an unofficial rule banning all women except her from the studio while recording was going on.

....

Meanwhile, back in the 60s: ever since Anthology got released, so did a lot of studio chatter. This is one priceless bit during Hey Jude rehearsals. "Err, Paul, it's very hard to sing this, you know." :) :) :)


On another note, but still in the survivors of the sixties club, there's a great review of Keith Richards' memoirs in form of an imaginary reply by Mick Jagger. Imaginary!Mick comes up with such great observations like "I thought we both learned that there is no point in sharing anything at all with the press, save for a few tidbits for the upbeat The Stones are back in top rocking form! article that accompanies each of our tours. I think Keith never appreciated the tedious hours I have to spend with Jann Wenner to accomplish that". Or: "I am forced into the role of martinet, the one who gets blamed for silly arbitrary rules. Like, for a show in front of 60,000 people for which we are being paid some 6 or 7 million dollars for a few hours work, I like to suggest to everyone that we start on time, and that we each have in place a personal plan, in whatever way suits us best, to stay conscious for the duration of the show."


Moving on to more fictional territory, the preliminary list of Yuletide fandoms is out. Babylon 5 didn't cut it, which I'm told is my fault along with some other suspects, but that's not fair. I so nominated it! Otoh, Crusade made the cut. So - new Crusade fic this year? (Hopefully not about Galen?) Also, Nowhere Boy and Two of Us are both there. If, you know, someone in theory happens to have a hang-up writing about certain people who are still alive but on the other hand can circumvent that by writing about completely fictionalized versions of them. Theoretically.

Merlin fanfic rec:

Portrait: of Gwen, that is, in her relationships with Merlin, Morgana and Arthur, respectively. Season 3 spoilers until Eye of the Phoenix. I love Gwen, and the author here captures her BFFness with Merlin, the changes with Morgana and the awkward tenderness with Arthur very well indeed.
selenak: (Companions - Kathyh)
Damn, Undercovers got cancelled. I know I didn't review the last two episodes, but that wasn't because I didn't enjoy them; because I didn't have much more to say than "that was fun". Which might be the problem with some viewers - it's that paradox, an almost entirely angst free spy show, the anti Nikita, so to speak - and so far case of the week rather than arc, but as much as I love arcs (when done well) and am an angst fiend at times, it was nice to have a weekly bubbly feel good tv I could enjoy. Incidentally, this week had David Anders guest starring. Which reminded me that I was in the minority of Alias fans who didn't take to Sark upon first appearance and very belatedly - only in s4 and s5, when he showed up very rarely - came to actually like the character. ("The beautiful man is dying" will never not be funny. It, err, depends on the context.) In Heroes I liked him better as a drunken mercenary than as a villainous immortal (not least because every time Adam's age was mentioned as a big thing, the Highlander fan in me thought of Amanda with her millennium and Methos with his five millennia and thought "you've got to be kidding, child"); but he's a reliable pro, and while the role in Undercovers wasn't especially taxing, he did a good job, and, I'm happy to report, stands by his age. (I.e. they didn't try to make him look youthful anymore.)

But curse you, network, for the show cancellation. At worst, the show could be accused of being a little formulaic, but which spy show isn't? And it did have very likeable leads (both of which heightened the presence of pocs on American tv in central roles instead of being sidekicks) with good chemistry. Also I liked the supporting cast. And now there will be no more Sam and Steven and Hoyt and Leo on my tv screen. In conclusion, damn!

On the bright side of things, you find stuff on the internet like this:


Coo-coo-achoo Coo-coo-achoo




Also [personal profile] diotimah pointed me towards other examples of the Muppets covering the Beatles. And then I found out they covered the Rolling Stones as well.

Now who can resist that? )
selenak: (Beatles by Alexis3)
Treasures you find at YouTube, #14533: the original promo for Something. Which is... something. Apparantly whoever shot it - the busy Michael Lindsay-Hogg, or was he too busy being traumatized by the rough cut of Let it Be at that point? - had the bright idea that since this is a love song, the four Beatles should pose with their respective significant others (at that point: Yoko, Linda, Pattie and Maureen) and demonstrate the joys of romance. Now, the ladies are doing just fine in the result, but the guys... George, whose big song this is, glowers throughout as if someone just told him Frank Sinatra called it his favourite Lennon/McCartney tune. (Or as if Eric Clapton just broke the news of being in love with Pattie, but I think it's a bit too early for that.) John is stone faced throughout, with a very brief grimace of an exception. Paul by contrast tries desperately to look jolly and cheerful and only succeeds looking like a crazy axe murderer (the beard helps). Ringo looks like he's thinking "are we done shooting this yet so Mo and I can go home?" Though he and Maureen win the most convincing on screen couple stakes. Judge for yourself:



How is this for a depressing thought: more than half of the people in this video are dead now (John, Maureen, Linda and George), with Yoko, Paul and Ringo as the sole survivors. On a related but brighter note, this reminds me of something I've been meaning to post. Pattie once joked that dating a Beatle, let alone marry one, was like joining the French Resistance, and she wasn't completely wrong. At least at the beginning of each relationship, fannish hatred was certain to be yours. Cynthia Lennon was the only one who went through the indignity of being hidden away and having to pretend she didn't exist at the start because Brian Epstein thought John being married would be a detriment to fannish hopes. (To say nothing of Brian's hopes, biographer Bob Spitz adds a bit cattily.) It didn't last long, not with the amount of public attention the Beatles were getting, and later girlfriends/wives didn't have to put up with it. This didn't make their lives that much easier. Maureen got her face scratched when Ringo became the second Beatle to tie the knot. Pattie had to disguise herself as a chamber maid to get out of the hotel where she was staying at with George. The absolut maximum of fannish hostility, though, was reserved for Linda and Yoko, who at the time of the break-up were often singled out as culprits not just by fangirls and -boys but even in the so called "serious" media. (My parents, for example, were absolutely convinced that animosity between Linda and Yoko broke up the Beatles. Why? Because they remembered reading it in the papers at the time. Pointing out that by the time Linda encountered Yoko, the Beatles were already in free fall and that they hardly interacted enough to form any kind of relationship, hostile or otherwise, was greeted with much surprise.)

Since Yoko is the better known woman (and hostility towards her became proverbial and made it to more recent stupid flowcharts as well as several spirited defense posts), I'll write about Linda. Now, the Linda hatred started to ebb away from the mid-80s onwards - probably due to a combination of sheer endurance (i.e. the stabiliity of the McCartney marriage and -family which was and is rare in the rock business), animal rights' campaigning and vegeterianism, and by the time she died of cancer in 1998, she was downright popular. Though occasionally you come across the old hostility revived. Germaine Greer for example, quoting witticisms like "what do you call a cow with wings? Linda McCartney!" and wondering "if Stella McCartney knew her mother was once known as Linda Starfucker". Then there is the latest McCartney biography by Howard Sounes, which I won't buy because the excerpts I read in newspapers contained such gems like "By marrying Paul, Linda instantly became a public figure — but opinion about her was always divided. Almost everybody I interviewed who knew her personally spoke very warmly of her, yet people in the media — myself included — found her a gauche, abrasive woman lacking in charm". And the usual hypocrisy of the press writing of the 60s who on the one hand reports male rock stars' promiscuity with an undertone of admiration but immediately cries "groupie!" in disdain when a woman in the same era also practised free love. Mr. Sounes would have us know that the woman's postumous image as as vegetarian saint is false because, shock horror, she slept with "probably 20 men" in the 60s before her marriage to Paul. And this sexist crap gets printed in 2010, not 1970. No money for this book from me, H.S., so thanks for getting these excerpts printed as a warning.

When the former Linda Eastman died, most headlines and obituaries picked of the various professions she had "photographer"; several collections of her photography are available both in print and online. Below the cut are some favourites of mine, demonstrating why she was indeed an excellent photographer.

The Rolling Stones, Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix, Yoko Ono and some people from Liverpool await )
selenak: (Carl Denham by Grayrace)
I became curious about The Runaways because of this review; the music and the group itself, I have to admit, was unknown to me. (I mean, obviously I know who Joan Jett is, I know several of her solo songs, and I saw her on screen in Light of Day with Michael J. Fox, not to mention that appearance in Highlander, but the Runaways as a group I hadn't known existed. I probably was too young in the mid-70s.) So I had no bias, preferences or expectations other than of the genre - rock group makes it and breaks - and how it would play out with a female group, based on the autobiography of one member, co-produced by another and directed by a female director.

Sex, drugs and rock'n roll, female version )

I also got around to reading the much discussed Keith Richards memoirs, Life, which made for an interesting counterpart.

Sex, drugs and rock'n roll, male version )
selenak: (Beatles by Alexis3)
The first part of the weekly SJA two parter was greeted with much squee by me and made me very happy, but you won't get a review until I've seen both parts, i.e. tomorrow. In the meantime, reading in various papers various people's reactions to the Keith Richards memoirs makes for an odd demonstration of how relaxing it can be not to be in a fandom. I mean, I like some of the Stones' songs, but I am not invested in them emotionally, neither in their overall music nor in them as people, and so I can just be amused and entertained by the latest round of Mick's-such-a-phony-and-mine's-bigger!/is not! instead of angsting as I might were they the other band.

Incidentally: Mick Jagger, Brian Jones and Marianne Faithfull are on several Beatles songs, notably All You Need Is Love and Yellow Submarine, George Harrison was a guest chez Richards on that fateful drug raid day in 1967 (and later figured out the police must have waited for him and Pattie to leave first because they didn't want to arrest a Beatle), and of course the first Stones' breakout hit, I Wanna Be Your Man, is a Lennon/McCartney tune they gave the Stones upon request, finishing it in front of their eyes in a gesture that combined generosity and showing off; the press and fans made and partly still makes much of the Beatles/Stones rivalry, but in actual practice this was mainly a media event whereas the bands themselves were friends. Though Mick Jagger in his funny and affectionate induction speech for the Beatles at the Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame memorably called them "the four-headed-monster" and admitted he was both jealous and inspired to start song writing himself back in ye early 60s.

Meanwhile, the fellow musicians the Beatles were inspired and challenged by in the 60s were, other than their old childhood heroes from the 50s, a) Bob Dylan and b) Brian Wilson. Of course Bob Dylan inspired pretty much every other song writer in the 60s (the two most obviously Dylan-esque Beatles songs are You've got to hide your love away and Norwegian Wood), but the other thing that he did for the Beatles was to introduce them to marijuana, which is one of those pop history anecdotes that never gets old. It's August 28th 1964, the Beatles are locked in a New York hotel room because going outside has become impossible, but they asked, via a journalist, whether they could meet Bob D. anyway since they're fans. He agrees to pay a visit and comes up from Woodstock to the Delmonico Hotel. Ever gracious and polite, Brian Epstein, the Beatles' manager, of course asks Dylan what he'd like to drink.

Bob D: Cheap Wine.

An embarrassed Brian admits they have only good wine there but sends out roadie Mal Evans to procur something suitably cheap. In the meantime, Bob Dylan suggests smoking some pot. Now very embarrassed, Brian and the boys admit they don't have pot, either, since they haven't smoked it before. (They were introduced to pills in Hamburg and took them a lot in order to stay awake and energetic during the seven-hours-marathon sessions, but other than that hadn't had anything more adventurous than Scotch and Coke.)

Bob D: But what about your song? *attempts Beatlesque headshake* I get high, I get high?

John: It's "I can't hide, I can't hide, actually.


This inspires Dylan to helpfully provide his own pot, roll a joint, and pass it to Ringo. Not knowing that pot smoking etiquette means you share the joint around, Ringo smokes the entire thing in the bathroom, returns to the main suite and announces the ceiling is coming down. At which point the rest, including Brian, want some as well, and the whole thing gets very giggly indeed. (With a sad note in as much as Brian, looking at himself in the mirror, pointed, said "Jew" and giggled, the first time he referred to himself as Jewish in company, which tells you something about Brian's issues and repression.) Paul was convinced he had discovered the meaning of life and told Mal Evans, who had returned with the Dylan-ordered cheap wine, to write down the wisdom revealed. When they checked the next morning, the only thing written on the paper was "there are seven levels", to everyone's amusement. Dylan departs, secure in the knowledge he changed their music for good. (And provided occasion for various headlines involving pot busts years later.)

There are various cinematic takes on this.

Bob Dylan meets the Beatles in black and white and colour )

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 23 456 7
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22 232425 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 05:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios