January Meme: Endgame How?
Jan. 24th, 2022 05:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well, first of all, I'm not the ideal person to ask, because by and large, I was okay with Endgame. Doesn't mean I loved every minute or character turn, but practically the only plot bit that stuck in my throat was Steve returning to Peggy in the 1940s, because I loved Agent Carter, and one of the aspects I most treasured about it was Peggy having a "grief, but moving on" arc. I love stories where without denying the powerful emotion of the past the character manages to heal, move on, form new meaningful relationships. All of which Peggy did. There's also the basic problem of any story where a character with full knowledge of ensueing disasters - not just for the world at large, but for his nearest and dearest in particular - goes back in the past and doesn't change this, but honestly, the negation of Peggy's moving-on-story bothered me more.
Other controversial storyelements of Endgame, like the five years between the Snappening and the return of the blipped not being reversed, I actually approve of. I was pleasantly surprised, because I expected everything to go back to the point of the snappening, as opposed to the MCU truly having to deal with the intervening years and half the population disappearing, then returning. If you kill off half the universe, I much prefer there to be actual consequences, not a return to business as usual. However, let's assume I'd have to write Endgame without any knowledge of what the canonical writers would do. I think:
- Tony definitely would have died as well; it really has been building up for a good long while
- after "Infinity War", I had read a great fanfiction about his and Nebula's
- no "Professor Hulk"; Bruce and the Hulk have come to an accomodation another way, and also, Bruce, Tony and Shuri together develop whichever MacGuffin allows Our Heroes to accumulate the Infinity Stones
- I wouldn't have killed off Natasha, because she's one of my favourite characters (btw: I liked both the Black Widow solo movie, which we got too late, and Hawkeye the Series), and she had untold stories, but I wouldn't have killed off Clint, either; if someone had to die for the Soul Stone, I'd have killed off Steve, who also realistically could have won the fight with whichever other Avenger went with him there
- I'd have given some agenda to the snapped people; maybe they are trapped in the orange dimension of the soul stone, and Wanda, Strange, Peter and Gamora organize them, and the combination of Wanda's and Strange's powers plus whatever Tony, Bruce and Shuri have been inventing enables a return of the dusted population
- since I had really liked Thor's scenes in Infinity War (more so than Ragnarök, which was way too jokey to me), I'd have built on his newly formed relationship with Rocket; no fat belly of depression, because that wasn't funny when Lee Adama had it on BSG, either, but depression would have happened (well, continued)
- there would have been some price to pay for the return of the dusted (other than Tony and Steve dying, I mean); I have no idea how much time I'd have let pass between the Snappening and the return, but I would have wanted either to keep that time intact or to let everyone (snapped and not snapped population alike) maintain their memories of what had happened, as opposed to going back to business as usual.
I'm sure there'd be other things, but thankfully I did not get that job, because writing movies with a gigantic cast and gazillion individual storylines to consider really is not my forte.
The other days
no subject
Date: 2022-01-24 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-24 07:13 pm (UTC)My brain just gets broken at the probable apocalyptic events of half of everything just vanishing and then, five years later, everything that had vanished reappearing. It's got almost a kind of fairy-tale quality to it that just doesn't work for me in realistic media.
no subject
Date: 2022-01-24 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-24 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-24 07:10 pm (UTC)I've read in some various interviews that Bruce was supposed to maybe integrate Hulk and himself on the battlefield in Wakanda -- he was trying so hard to make Hulk come out, and instead maybe Smart Hulk would have come out of the Hulkbuster and been more helpful. But apparently they felt that was too much of a "win" and they really wanted everyone in IW to lose and lose hard, and that also overshadowed Bruce's change too much. (Which might have been better than leaving it out entirely!)
I loved the idea of the snapped people all stuck in the soul stone world or whatever and it was disappointing that they all literally went poof. Not to mention the entire giant problem I had with Thanos's "solution" vs the law of the conservation of energy (at least as I understand it), but whatever.
I think the biggest change I would have made to Endgame apart from all the plot and Snap stuff is, I would've made it two regular-sized movies. It just felt like there was so much character development and action plot they were trying to stuff into even a three-hour-long movie.
no subject
Date: 2022-01-24 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-25 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-25 11:33 am (UTC)And killing off Natasha.
And Professor Hulk.
Come to think of it, as I had very few other problems with it, your version sounds perfect to me.
no subject
Date: 2022-01-25 03:53 pm (UTC)