Stratford, or: Hamlet
Aug. 1st, 2008 01:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So… I believe there was something about a play?
Seriously now: it was superb. I made it to Stratford without a problem, reunited with
bimo, and spent the rest of the afternoon strolling through Stratford and chatting. Incidentally, if you’re a new reader to these ramblings and want pictures, I posted some two years ago (try the “england” or “stratford” tag); yesterday was cloudy, and I didn’t do the sight seeing thing beyond strolling anyway.
Now, the production takes place in the Courtyard, which was packed. We had gallery seats, but, I’m happy to report, could see the actors’ expressions superbly, save for the occasional time when the crown lustres hid their heads. The crownlustres being one of the few bits of set decorations that existed; mainly it was just the black stage and the mirror-wall behind, where both Polonius and Claudius hid at various times. In the closet scene, when Hamlet hears Polonius, the mirror gets smashed and remains so for the reminder of the production.
Costume-wise, it was modern contemporary dress, except for the ghost, who was in medieval armour, and the play-within-a-play, which took place in elaborate Elizabethan costumes, with the player queen being indeed a young man. And while we’re talking looks, since I know certain people on my list really need to know: David Tennant’s hair starts out well-combed and moderate for the second scene where Claudius holds his speech and starts going wild immediately after he hears about the ghost, remaining wild for the rest of the production. Clearly, this is no BBC special effect. *g * (He also spent most of the play barefoot – as described by Ophelia – which made me think of
versaphile, who knows why.)
Hamlet can be an incredibly suspenseful play if you let it, and this production did; they basically played it as a psychological thriller, no allusions to contemporary politics, though Fortinbras’ people in the two brief scenes we saw them in wore army uniforms. Patrick Stewart doing double duty as the Ghost and Claudius worked amazingly well; considering that he wore evening dress as Claudius and had a fake beard and hair and the armour as the ghost, and had to change from one into the other at the opening of the play fairly quickly, he must be really fast with the costuem changes. He played Claudius as a restrained, dignfied statesman early on, with the affectionate looks and gestures making clear the bond with Gertrude; the first crack during the performance of The Mousetrap, the play within a play, was played quite different from other productions. He didn’t fly into a rage/or panic but got up, crossed the stage to go to Hamlet, looked at him intently (and this was an incredibly intense scene, with Hamlet looking back in an ecstatic, terrible joy, but I’ll get to DT in a moment) and after that tense held silence left. Then later when Claudius is alone, his breakdown and the “Oh my offense is rank, it smells to heaven!” speech is all the more startling because of all the self-control before. I’ve always seen Claudius as one of the most interesting villains in Shakespeare; he’s not a megalomaniac, nor is he out to kill anyone, he doesn’t turn against Hamlet (Junior) until it’s clear Hamlet is a lethal threat to him, the love for Gertrude is real, he might well be a good king, and he’s definitely good at keeping his head in a crisis, see his talking Laertes out of killing him and into aiding him – but he did commit fratricide, and as he himself notes, it’s no good repenting if you want to keep the benefits of your murder. In the Kenneth Branagh film, they’re at least subtextually playing with the possibility that Claudius might be Hamlet’s biological father. Not so hear, but you do get the impression Hamlet’s idolization of the late Hamlet Senior and hate for Claudius is a lot of projection, and the two have more in common than either is comfortable with. A little more than kin and less than kind, indeed. The death scene(s), too: in this production, you get the idea Gertrude realizes the cup is poisoned when Claudius warns her not to drink it and that’s why she does. Some productions I’ve seen had Gertrude turn against Claudius after the closet scene and behave coldly from that point onwards, but not this one. It has them being tender with each other quite until the end, but Gertrude going increasingly to pieces post-closet scene, with her loyalties split between husband and son. Hence the poison cup. And hence the way Hamlet at last kills Claudius: he doesn’t stab him or stuff his mouth with the poison, as I have seen before. Instead, when he says “drink this and follow my mother” he’s actually offering a choice (though he has his rapier pointed at Claudius when he hands him the cup) and Claudius does follow suit and drink, with it open to debate whether he does because he’s being forced and sees no way out, or whether he wants to. When he falls down, his hand is reaching for the dead Gertrude.
The entire ensemble was excellent, with Oliver Ford Davies playing Polonius mostly as comic relief but nonetheless getting across the paranoid control Polonius exerts (or tries to) over his children, and Penny Downe playing Gertrude in a similar manner to Patrick Stewart’s Claudius, going from outwards aspect – charming society hostess in her case – to inwards revelation in the later part of the play; I’ve already talked about the sense of being torn to pieces. When she says “oh Hamlet, you have split my heart in two” she means just that. She has a startling outburst of laughter during the closet scene; the emotional breakdown fever in Elsinore has gripped her, too.
Mariah Gale as Ophelia is playful with her brother Laertes in her early scenes and more determined and less wobbly in her first confrontation with Hamlet than other Ophelias I’ve seen, but during the play-within-a-play scene it’s already clear she’s brittle; then, when she’s mad, there is also a fury driving her, which is a fascinating take on the character, the madness usually being played in the sweet and gentle manner. But here Ophelia when mad has a rage that is no longer helpless as she directs it at Gertrude, Claudius, everyone.
Favourite theatre in joke detail: when Hamlet (and Horatio) have it out with Guildenstern and Rosenkrantz after the play-within-a-play, Hamlet actually plays on a lute, and what he plays is “Three blind mice”. Which is of course the melody that provides the biggest clue in Agatha Christie’s The Mousetrap, that play named after Hamlet’s play-within-a-play which we’ve just seen.
And now I’ve teased you enough. So, David Tennant as Hamlet. First I must say that filmed Hamlet performances – whether it’s Olivier or Branagh or, God forbid, Mel Gibson – which are the ones most people can be counted on having seen if they aren’t familiar with stage productions – have never really satisfied me, though Branagh comes closest. (But he still strikes me as too old and too self-conscious – and not in a way the character is.) Tennant’s Hamlet, otoh, I was completely happy with, and I don’t think it’s because of actor bias. Mind you, DT’s incredibly youthful face actually sells the “student from Wittenberg” thing whereas most actors simply look too old not just for being a student but for reacting to the loss of a father and the Gertrude/Claudius union the way Hamlet does, but that outward advantage wouldn’t have mattered if his acting hadn’t been good. Especially given the company he was in. Moments that particular stick to mind: the initial reunion with Horatio (the change of demeanour from Hamlet’s perfunctionary politeness to Marcellus and Bernardo to the glad hug he greets Horatio with) – in this production you see where Horatio’s loyalty comes from; his expression when he realises that he and Ophelia are being watched, and that Ophelia knows and lies to him (and again, the switch of demeanor then; I’ve seen Hamlets who were on to the game from the start and treated Ophelia accordingly, but here the first “get thee to a nunnery” is spoken as a genuine warning, and then after the “where is your father?” and Ophelia’s response it changes, by voice and expression alone, to angry disappointed lashing out and cruelty. The way Tennant made the big speeches and quotes, whether it was “to be or not to be” or “oh what a rogue and peasant slave” etc. flow out of whatever mood Hamlet was in. That incredible silent moment with Claudius after the play-within-a-play I already described. Which helps set up the later scene with Hamlet deciding not to kill Claudius while Claudius is praying (I always wonder about how many of the audience get what the reasoning – if Claudius is killed while repenting, he won’t go to hell – says about Hamlet, but it’s set up here, and the production actually made that scene the cliffhanger interval break in a very tv way: Hamlet comes across the praying Claudius, pulls his knife, and sudden darkness. Stay tuned for part II, audience. The Ophelia grave scene; it’s hard to play without either Hamlet coming across as absolutely insufferable or as mocking Laertes, but in this production I actually believed Hamlet had loved Ophelia (though not as much as his parents). The moments of sheer fun, as with Hamlet and the players (who basically were indulgent pros towards their amateur enthusiast patron), and the enthusiasm and wit which are as much a part of Hamlet as the grief and anger. The sudden quiet “if it were now…” etc. with Horatio before the duel scene that gave you the idea at this point Hamlet was indeed ready to die, and not in a half posing, half angry manner as he would have been at the start of the play. (Another thing: just as Claudius’ murder of his brother dooms him, and despite struggling against it he in a way knows it, you get the sense here Hamlet knows his killing of Polonius means his own death, though it has taken him until the duel notice to internalize it.) The duel scene, which startes with mannered fencing and then picks up vicious speed, and both DT and Edward Bennett, who plays Laertes and is DT’s understudy for Hamlet, make you believe in the genuineness of the fencing. (Go, fight coordinator Terry King.) Just – everything. A very, very happy viewer I.
Bimo and I sat near the aisle so were out of the playhouse pretty quickly and made our way to the stage door, but of course there was already a big crowd. Both Patrick Stewart and David Tennant came out for a bit and signed some autographs before calling it a night, but with the sheer mass of people, we just saw the back of Stewart’s bald head and his profile now and then; DT being a somewhat larger, his entire head was visible over the crowd now and then, and I might have gotten a photo (will have to check once I’m in London, I’m writing this on the train), but we weren’t surprised we didn’t make it to the front before they both left. After three and a half hours of performance, it was really nice to do a bit of fanservice at all. Speaking of the fans, as opposed to certain clichés in the press, everyone was well-behaved, both during the performance (i.e. no reactions that didn’t have to do with what was presented on stage, no photos) and later in front of the stage door. Which, despite the lethal ending of the play, left everyone in a great mood as we wandered away and back to our hotels.
Lastly: according to the programm, the sound designer, one Jeremy Dunn, “is working on a musical version of Doctor Who”. Oh really?
ETA: And here are what pictures I got:


And thus I greet y'all from Stratford:

Seriously now: it was superb. I made it to Stratford without a problem, reunited with
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Now, the production takes place in the Courtyard, which was packed. We had gallery seats, but, I’m happy to report, could see the actors’ expressions superbly, save for the occasional time when the crown lustres hid their heads. The crownlustres being one of the few bits of set decorations that existed; mainly it was just the black stage and the mirror-wall behind, where both Polonius and Claudius hid at various times. In the closet scene, when Hamlet hears Polonius, the mirror gets smashed and remains so for the reminder of the production.
Costume-wise, it was modern contemporary dress, except for the ghost, who was in medieval armour, and the play-within-a-play, which took place in elaborate Elizabethan costumes, with the player queen being indeed a young man. And while we’re talking looks, since I know certain people on my list really need to know: David Tennant’s hair starts out well-combed and moderate for the second scene where Claudius holds his speech and starts going wild immediately after he hears about the ghost, remaining wild for the rest of the production. Clearly, this is no BBC special effect. *g * (He also spent most of the play barefoot – as described by Ophelia – which made me think of
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Hamlet can be an incredibly suspenseful play if you let it, and this production did; they basically played it as a psychological thriller, no allusions to contemporary politics, though Fortinbras’ people in the two brief scenes we saw them in wore army uniforms. Patrick Stewart doing double duty as the Ghost and Claudius worked amazingly well; considering that he wore evening dress as Claudius and had a fake beard and hair and the armour as the ghost, and had to change from one into the other at the opening of the play fairly quickly, he must be really fast with the costuem changes. He played Claudius as a restrained, dignfied statesman early on, with the affectionate looks and gestures making clear the bond with Gertrude; the first crack during the performance of The Mousetrap, the play within a play, was played quite different from other productions. He didn’t fly into a rage/or panic but got up, crossed the stage to go to Hamlet, looked at him intently (and this was an incredibly intense scene, with Hamlet looking back in an ecstatic, terrible joy, but I’ll get to DT in a moment) and after that tense held silence left. Then later when Claudius is alone, his breakdown and the “Oh my offense is rank, it smells to heaven!” speech is all the more startling because of all the self-control before. I’ve always seen Claudius as one of the most interesting villains in Shakespeare; he’s not a megalomaniac, nor is he out to kill anyone, he doesn’t turn against Hamlet (Junior) until it’s clear Hamlet is a lethal threat to him, the love for Gertrude is real, he might well be a good king, and he’s definitely good at keeping his head in a crisis, see his talking Laertes out of killing him and into aiding him – but he did commit fratricide, and as he himself notes, it’s no good repenting if you want to keep the benefits of your murder. In the Kenneth Branagh film, they’re at least subtextually playing with the possibility that Claudius might be Hamlet’s biological father. Not so hear, but you do get the impression Hamlet’s idolization of the late Hamlet Senior and hate for Claudius is a lot of projection, and the two have more in common than either is comfortable with. A little more than kin and less than kind, indeed. The death scene(s), too: in this production, you get the idea Gertrude realizes the cup is poisoned when Claudius warns her not to drink it and that’s why she does. Some productions I’ve seen had Gertrude turn against Claudius after the closet scene and behave coldly from that point onwards, but not this one. It has them being tender with each other quite until the end, but Gertrude going increasingly to pieces post-closet scene, with her loyalties split between husband and son. Hence the poison cup. And hence the way Hamlet at last kills Claudius: he doesn’t stab him or stuff his mouth with the poison, as I have seen before. Instead, when he says “drink this and follow my mother” he’s actually offering a choice (though he has his rapier pointed at Claudius when he hands him the cup) and Claudius does follow suit and drink, with it open to debate whether he does because he’s being forced and sees no way out, or whether he wants to. When he falls down, his hand is reaching for the dead Gertrude.
The entire ensemble was excellent, with Oliver Ford Davies playing Polonius mostly as comic relief but nonetheless getting across the paranoid control Polonius exerts (or tries to) over his children, and Penny Downe playing Gertrude in a similar manner to Patrick Stewart’s Claudius, going from outwards aspect – charming society hostess in her case – to inwards revelation in the later part of the play; I’ve already talked about the sense of being torn to pieces. When she says “oh Hamlet, you have split my heart in two” she means just that. She has a startling outburst of laughter during the closet scene; the emotional breakdown fever in Elsinore has gripped her, too.
Mariah Gale as Ophelia is playful with her brother Laertes in her early scenes and more determined and less wobbly in her first confrontation with Hamlet than other Ophelias I’ve seen, but during the play-within-a-play scene it’s already clear she’s brittle; then, when she’s mad, there is also a fury driving her, which is a fascinating take on the character, the madness usually being played in the sweet and gentle manner. But here Ophelia when mad has a rage that is no longer helpless as she directs it at Gertrude, Claudius, everyone.
Favourite theatre in joke detail: when Hamlet (and Horatio) have it out with Guildenstern and Rosenkrantz after the play-within-a-play, Hamlet actually plays on a lute, and what he plays is “Three blind mice”. Which is of course the melody that provides the biggest clue in Agatha Christie’s The Mousetrap, that play named after Hamlet’s play-within-a-play which we’ve just seen.
And now I’ve teased you enough. So, David Tennant as Hamlet. First I must say that filmed Hamlet performances – whether it’s Olivier or Branagh or, God forbid, Mel Gibson – which are the ones most people can be counted on having seen if they aren’t familiar with stage productions – have never really satisfied me, though Branagh comes closest. (But he still strikes me as too old and too self-conscious – and not in a way the character is.) Tennant’s Hamlet, otoh, I was completely happy with, and I don’t think it’s because of actor bias. Mind you, DT’s incredibly youthful face actually sells the “student from Wittenberg” thing whereas most actors simply look too old not just for being a student but for reacting to the loss of a father and the Gertrude/Claudius union the way Hamlet does, but that outward advantage wouldn’t have mattered if his acting hadn’t been good. Especially given the company he was in. Moments that particular stick to mind: the initial reunion with Horatio (the change of demeanour from Hamlet’s perfunctionary politeness to Marcellus and Bernardo to the glad hug he greets Horatio with) – in this production you see where Horatio’s loyalty comes from; his expression when he realises that he and Ophelia are being watched, and that Ophelia knows and lies to him (and again, the switch of demeanor then; I’ve seen Hamlets who were on to the game from the start and treated Ophelia accordingly, but here the first “get thee to a nunnery” is spoken as a genuine warning, and then after the “where is your father?” and Ophelia’s response it changes, by voice and expression alone, to angry disappointed lashing out and cruelty. The way Tennant made the big speeches and quotes, whether it was “to be or not to be” or “oh what a rogue and peasant slave” etc. flow out of whatever mood Hamlet was in. That incredible silent moment with Claudius after the play-within-a-play I already described. Which helps set up the later scene with Hamlet deciding not to kill Claudius while Claudius is praying (I always wonder about how many of the audience get what the reasoning – if Claudius is killed while repenting, he won’t go to hell – says about Hamlet, but it’s set up here, and the production actually made that scene the cliffhanger interval break in a very tv way: Hamlet comes across the praying Claudius, pulls his knife, and sudden darkness. Stay tuned for part II, audience. The Ophelia grave scene; it’s hard to play without either Hamlet coming across as absolutely insufferable or as mocking Laertes, but in this production I actually believed Hamlet had loved Ophelia (though not as much as his parents). The moments of sheer fun, as with Hamlet and the players (who basically were indulgent pros towards their amateur enthusiast patron), and the enthusiasm and wit which are as much a part of Hamlet as the grief and anger. The sudden quiet “if it were now…” etc. with Horatio before the duel scene that gave you the idea at this point Hamlet was indeed ready to die, and not in a half posing, half angry manner as he would have been at the start of the play. (Another thing: just as Claudius’ murder of his brother dooms him, and despite struggling against it he in a way knows it, you get the sense here Hamlet knows his killing of Polonius means his own death, though it has taken him until the duel notice to internalize it.) The duel scene, which startes with mannered fencing and then picks up vicious speed, and both DT and Edward Bennett, who plays Laertes and is DT’s understudy for Hamlet, make you believe in the genuineness of the fencing. (Go, fight coordinator Terry King.) Just – everything. A very, very happy viewer I.
Bimo and I sat near the aisle so were out of the playhouse pretty quickly and made our way to the stage door, but of course there was already a big crowd. Both Patrick Stewart and David Tennant came out for a bit and signed some autographs before calling it a night, but with the sheer mass of people, we just saw the back of Stewart’s bald head and his profile now and then; DT being a somewhat larger, his entire head was visible over the crowd now and then, and I might have gotten a photo (will have to check once I’m in London, I’m writing this on the train), but we weren’t surprised we didn’t make it to the front before they both left. After three and a half hours of performance, it was really nice to do a bit of fanservice at all. Speaking of the fans, as opposed to certain clichés in the press, everyone was well-behaved, both during the performance (i.e. no reactions that didn’t have to do with what was presented on stage, no photos) and later in front of the stage door. Which, despite the lethal ending of the play, left everyone in a great mood as we wandered away and back to our hotels.
Lastly: according to the programm, the sound designer, one Jeremy Dunn, “is working on a musical version of Doctor Who”. Oh really?
ETA: And here are what pictures I got:


And thus I greet y'all from Stratford:

no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 12:06 pm (UTC)Speaking of filmed versions, have you seen this one (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099727/), with Kevin Kline in the lead. I'm quite fond of it in general, and particularly of the way the Hamlet/Ophelia scenes play.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 02:43 pm (UTC)Ganymede was much too femme; if you're going to attempt one of the gender swap plays on film, I think you should really try to sell it).
Re: the Hamlet I particularly thought of it in your review because Diane Venora as Ophelia was quite a bit more mature, and more self-assertive, than I was used to seeing, and it was the first time I really bought her and Hamlet as two people who had actually had a relationship.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 12:41 pm (UTC)Speaking of the fans, as opposed to certain clichés in the press, everyone was well-behaved
That's good to know. Kudos to both actors for signing autographs after what must have been a hugely gruelling evening's work.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:10 pm (UTC)And yes, it was great that the actors did that. Stay tuned, I'm uploading what photos I got and will edit this entry with them.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:33 pm (UTC)If it had been a concert, yes possibly, but for a play unfortunately not. Never mind I'll get to see it somehow. I did see a rumour of a DVD if I can't see if physically so I hope that's true.
At least I saw Derek Jacobi play Hamlet so if I can't have the Doctor at least I've seen the Master :)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 12:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:04 pm (UTC)I've heard Stewart speak about Claudius several times and your analysis of his portrayal sounds very much like those discussion -- Claudius is no "plain villain," that he sees himself as a good, responsible man, quite probably a better king than Hamlet Sr., who loves Gertrude and for her sake, if nothing else, would like to get along with that brat son of hers.
This does sound like this is one of those productions that has the right actors in the right parts at the right moment in their careers. Glad you had a good time and wish I could have seen it.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:21 pm (UTC)There's a concerted effort to get people to write the RSC to ask if there is possibly going to be a DVD release. Already, it's changed from "no plans" to "no plans but we may reconsider". I think they know they have a hit on their hands and know there are audiences who would like to see this even if they can't get to Stratford or London. And since apparently not even RSC members can buy tickets for the London run on-line at this point, I think they realize they may well have a market.
Aside from the chance to see DT's Hamlet, I'd really like to see Stewart's Claudius and compare this performance with the one he did back in 1980 with Derek Jacobi as Hamlet for the BBC Complete Cycle. Very interesting to see how nearly thirty years can change a performance.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:02 pm (UTC)I had a theory once that Gertrude is distraught at losing Hamlet sen. and looking for a substitute; she initially sees Claudius as the closest to him, but round about the closet scene realises her son is closer. This needn't go in an Oedipal direction, she just wishes that her husband were still around.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 05:51 am (UTC)Interesting theory. You're the first person who takes Hamlet at his word that his parents had a loving marriage pre Hamlet Senior's death, now that I think of it. Though I note Hamlet Senior goes on about how much he doted on Gertrude, not how she felt about him. (Hamlet Junior does say she couldn't get enough of him at one point, I know.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 01:46 pm (UTC)I think Hamlet Senior's character is up for grabs; to the best of my recollection, no one except Hamlet Junior says much about it. The ghost says he's currently in hell, or presumably purgatory since he's got to work off his sins, but I'm not sure that proves he's particularly bad; he makes a big point about dying unshriven, whereas Hamlet says that if he kills his uncle as he's praying Claudius will automatically go to heaven. So I think it's like the whole business of unbaptised babies not being allowed into heaven, and there's a mindset hard for us to share which lays more emphasis on religious process than deeds. (The row about whether Ophelia can be buried in consecrated ground is the only one that almost makes sense to me, as if she were a suicide she died committing a sin under that code.)
But I think it's likely that Hamlet Senior did love his wife, as his son reports, because he appears to be concerned for her when he actually sees her again in the closet scene.
Gertrude's harder to discern; she does remarry very quickly, but that may be, as I suggested, a desperate act by a woman on the rebound. There's also a sound political reason, of course; if she wants her son to succeed to the throne next time round, she doesn't want Claudius marrying a young woman who could give him his own heir. (cf Prince Caspian, where Miraz's castle reminds me so much of Elsinore, and Doctor Cornelius explains "As long as he had no children of his own, he was willing enough that you should be King after he died. He may not have cared much about you, but he would rather you should have the throne than a stranger. Now that he has a son of his own he will want his own son to be the next King...") I don't think I've ever seen a production that brought out Gertrude's possible political motives.
Claudius is certainly more interesting if sympathetic, and I think the biggest weakness of Kozintsev's version is that it accepts Hamlet's account of "the bloat king" without question. I presume you know Cavafy's poem on King Claudius (http://www.cavafy.com/poems/content.asp?id=163&cat=4)?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:42 pm (UTC)Hamlet's not my favorite Shakespeare as a general rule, but this sounds like a play well worth seeing. I envy!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 05:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:36 pm (UTC)Tickets:
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:00 pm (UTC)(Also, very good to hear that the fans are being well-behaved, contrary to rumor.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:07 pm (UTC)And in defence of Branagh, having seen him play Hamlet for the RSC when he was the right age, he fit the role just fine and he never struck me as studied back then. The film came about 10 years too late for him as an actor but probably at exactly the right moment for him as a director, so it is swings and roundabouts.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:19 pm (UTC)I'm happy for you that you got to see this excellent production. Seriously, I am. I'M HAPPY!!!!!
*scary smile*
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 11:16 pm (UTC)I am incredibly jealous of all you Hamlet-seeing people. It sounds fantastic.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 06:02 am (UTC)I'm crossing my fingers for a dvd, so you can share eventually.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 03:53 pm (UTC)I'd have loved to see that, but I live in Paris...I agree with you about actors looking often too old to play Hamlet.
Ok living in Paris isn't so bad! ;- )
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 11:47 am (UTC)Michael Billington in the Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2008/aug/06/theatre.rsc) - and he mentions my beloved Smoktunovsky in his list of top ten modern Hamlets! - also photos (http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/gallery/2008/jul/31/david.tennant.theatre.shakespeare?picture=336095864).
Paul Taylor in the Independent (http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre/reviews/hamlet-courtyard-theatre-stratforduponavon-886094.html) - who answers the question I was going to ask you, viz what accent Tennant used. I share his disappointment that it wasn't the actor's natural Scots; I'd been imagining him that way, because I find him so much more attractive with that voice.
Charles Spencer in the Daily Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2008/08/06/bthamlet106.xml) - not bad, but most thrilled by Stewart's Claudius.
Benedict Nightingale in the Times (http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/stage/theatre/article4466565.ece) - delighted that Tennant proves he's got the range after all.
I don't normally check out the tabloids, but I was intrigued by a remark during a radio interview with Michael Billington and Simon Russell Beale this morning that they'd been a lot less enthusiastic than the newspapers-still-known-as-broadsheets, so I took a look. The only review I could find (as opposed to stories about fans mobbing Who star) was in the Daily Mail - seems to be Quentin Letts (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1042018/Alas-poor-Dr-Who--youre-okay-world.html) - unimpressed by Tennant, but loved Stewart. The others either don't bother with theatre reviews or didn't get round to it overnight.
Simon Russell Beale, listed by most of the above reviewers as one of their favourite Hamlets (wish I'd seen that one!), put in his pitch to guest on Doctor Who during the radio interview, so I hope Moffat was listening.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 07:02 pm (UTC)Re: accent - ah, but none of the actors used a regional, not even the gravedigger, so if Tennant had it would have jarred with the rest. This being said I agree that his real life Scottish accent is the most attractive version of his voice.
Re: reviews - the general positivity pleases me since I loved the production, but it's interesting to see slightly different impressions from the same scenes - always fascinating to compare perspectives. Benedict Nightingale is an idiot if he a) thinks DT is using only one expression for the Doctor and b) hasn't seen him in other non-Doctor roles proving versatility before, though. (Recovery Recovery Recovery, damn it. Others, two, but that would be my exhibit a.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 08:34 pm (UTC)I've some sympathy with Nightingale in that, though I know Tennant uses other expressions for the Doctor, I really do think he overdoes the bulging-eyes-and-dropping-jaw one. It's knowing that he can do more and better that makes it irritating. And I was a bit alarmed to hear the Front Row (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/arts/frontrow/) reviewer this evening saying that he thought some of the bulging-eyes mannerisms had carried over into this (though he thought they worked quite well - his primary criticism was of Greg Doran's production, as he thought Claudius was a bit too nice for Elsinore to be a dangerous and paranoid place).
I think my exhibit might be Takin' Over the Asylum (http://kalypso-v.livejournal.com/161119.html), even if he's in super-manic flow there too.