Still on an emotional high from the
Being Human finale, and the entire third season, which grew a beard so long it can call itself Barbarossa. *obscure German legend is obscure but was good enough for Heinrich Heine, so it's good enough for me* Meaning: rarely did I see such a satisfying and
right conclusion to an arc that looked at its characters unflinchingly.
Not unrelatedly, this put me in mind of previous examples of morally ambiguous characters, how their respective canons dealt with them and how fandom responded. Also of my own reactions. I like to think this wasn't/isn't always about how much I like the character in question. I mean, Londo Mollari is my favourite tv character of all time, I love him with the passion of a thousand burning suns and all other corny clichés, and yet one of several reasons why I insist the fifth season of Babylon 5 was a must is that had the show ended with season 4 (plus
Sleeping in Light), the way we'd have left Londo in s4 (i.e. happy) would have felt wrong and like a cop-out compared with what had gone on before, and the choices Londo had made. On the other hand, if
Battlestar Galactica's Gaius Baltar would have gotten
( a spoilery ending for BSG ), that would have felt like an easy cop-out, too, because of Baltar's own arc and nature. (As it is, the ending he did get felt perfect, simultanously both the best and the worst thing that could have happened from Baltar's own pov. And I like Gaius very much indeed as well (though not as much as I love Londo, but he is one of my BSG favourites).
Now, neither Londo nor Gaius Baltar were - for the majority of their fandoms at least - the woobies. And all too often, that's what the morally grey and darker grey to black crowd ends up as, with the result that the ambiguity which made them interesting originally gets airbrushed away and excused, sometimes by the fandom, sometimes by canon, sometimes by both. And woe to the characters who do not embrace those woobies and instead dare to hold them accountable to their actions. Especially when they're female. The comments I've seen during the last three or four weeks first re: Nina and then re: Annie in
Being Human were but the latest example; nothing new, really (though it still disturbs me to read them), when I think back to my first online fandom, which was
Highlander. The other day I came across
some interesting meta regarding Methos and the question of forgiveness (on the audience's part) (and I'm not just calling it interesting because the author recommended
Death and the Maiden in it, my old Cassandra (and Methos) story which I still regard as one of my writing breakthroughs in and out of fandom). It
is a highly subjective question, which characters a viewer forgives (or maybe not forgives but never stops embracing?), and which overplay their hand in this regard.
In the case of Methos, I'd say about 99% of all
Highlander watchers responded to the entire Horsemen arc by not just continuing to embrace but love even more fervently (and hating both female guest star and to a degree male main character for having different responses). The conditions for this are pretty much ideal - Methos was introduced as a witty, very attractive trickster type of guest character; he only shows up rarely which means he never has the chance to get "bad" episodes for the viewers to get used to him; at the time when the darkest chapter of his past is revealed, he's already saved the main character once or twice and gotten a touching girl of the week romance. (I've seen a lot of fans wistfully wish for the Methos show, but I never did, despite loving the character back then, because being elusive and unpredictable was part of his charm, which would have been lost had be become a regular series hero.) BUT, and that's probably a real reason why all those years and many a fannish experience later I still like Methos, I never felt the show itself downplayed the enormity of what he did. Or expected us to condemm Cassandra for not forgiving Methos, never mind what fandom did; HL the show could have done better by Cassandra in that they could have allowed her to demonstrate more competence with a sword (the woman is 3000 years old, for God's sake), and cut the Melvin Koren flashback down to two minutes instead, but one thing the show never did was presenting her as wrong to hate her rapist/torturer/brainwasher/all-around-bastard from the Bronze Age. And as opposed to a lot of fanfic which had her going insane so that Methos and/or Duncan could feel justified in killing her, the show let her walk away alive and unbowed. If the show had gone like so many, many fan-written stories featuring Cassandra did back then (and still do for all I know), I would have lost whatever fondness I had for Methos by now and would have wistfully looked for fanfic decapitating him instead.
Which brings me full circle with
Being Human. I don't I could have continued watching - and there will be a fourth season, yay! - if
( a lot of spoilery things would happened that didn't. ) As it is, I will buy this season on dvd as soon as it's available - which I did for none of the previous seasons - will rewatch often, and will be glued on my tv screen once the fourth season starts. This despite the fact that the ending of this one actually would serve as a great show finale as well, but: I love the set-up we're left with. And I love the characters. As they are now, and with all the potential they have for stories yet to come.