I finished the third season of For All Mankind, and thus all broadcast so far. (Youtube tells me there is a trailer for a fourth season, set in 2003, so this AU will be with us for at least one era more.) Still immensely watcheable, and I loved the big twist of the season premise. Now that's the right way to play with expectations and widen your fictional universe at the same time. (A more spoilery comment beneath the cut.) There were also new Cold War tropes interwoven, which made the The Americans watcher in me go "Are they actually giving (Spoiler) Martha's storyline? They are!". One big unsolved mystery is why, given the season premise, no episode managed to work in Bowie's Life on Mars, but hey. Maybe Moore & Co. thought it was overused by now.
This season is set partly in 1992, partly in 1995, and from an AU pov, it was fascinating to see what alternate or similar developments the show came up with. (Beyond faster technological developments courtesy of the ongoing space race; in this universe, NASA by the 1990s has become financially self sustaining courtesy of marketing their inventions originally made for the space program. This in turn meant electric cars, lap tops, touchscreens and emails happened a whole lot faster than in real life.) One way where society did not develop faster was regarding same sex relationships, which after being a subplot through two seasons involving one of the main astronaut characters becomes a main plot in s3. This is also connected to the general political American developments, which are partly different, partly parallel to rl events. (Re: Presidents - because Ted Kennedy does not go to Chappaquiddik as a result of the different moon landing fallout, he remains a viable Democratic candidate and wins against Nixon in 1972. Because he's Ted Kennedy in the 1970s, he still has sex scandals and a one term presidency, with Reagan coming in a term earlier. But Reagan isn't followed by George HW Bush, but by Gary Hart, who doesn't have a scandal and becomes a two terms president. In 1992, Bill Clinton is the Democratic nominee, but gets defeated by a (fictional) Republican candidate, who is President for the majority of season 3. The Republican party still has an evangelical wing, but so far, no Tea Party crazies have shown up. (Newt Gingrich was once mentioned in dialogue, but isn't Speaker, because with a Republican President instead of Clinton, the Democrats have the House.) Reagan doesn't seem to have been as big an influence as he was in our timeline. It feels a bit like the West Wing verse, where Democrats and Republicans are opponents and either party has jerks and backroom deals, but also a public service code and, oh eternal bliss, Fox News and the radicalisation going with same doesn't seem to exist. (There's a conservative network called Eagle News instead, but the brief clips shown so far aren't comparably poisonous and deranged.) I don't know whether that means Rupert Murdoch chose another career instead, but it certainly is another plus of this universe.
Now, so far the show while showing an increasing number of Russian characters has remained in the American pov, but it did provide some nods as to why the Soviet Union survived into 1995 instead of falling apart. Because of the Russians going to the moon first and throwing most of their money and energy into the ongoing space race, there is no Russian invasion to Afghanistan (presumably this means also no US backed Mujaheddin and no Taliban?), and Gorbachev's economic reforms actually work. (Otoh, no mention of German reunification. One hopes Putin remains stuck in Dresden among the Saxons.) (In rl, Putin was stationed in Dresden as a KGB official when the wall came down.) (It just occured to me: if there's no reunification and still a West and East Germany, one half of us is spared Sahra Wagenknecht. BLISS.)
Otoh, I was a bit slow; it took me most of the season to remember a certain spoilery rl event from the US in the 1990s which has a devastating and very appropriate for this new context parallel in the show in the finale. This despite the effect one show character is given a very similar background to the rl character he parallels. Anyway: you know how some AUs don't really bother with thinking their premise through because they just want one particular scenario? This is true for most of the "What if the Nazis won!" AUs I've seen and what makes them so annoying. I haven't come across one which didn't feel like the creator(s) wanted more than just a costume cosplay featuring the Evilest Villains (tm).) By contrast, this show so far does quite well with the increasing ripple effects.
lizbee said that the aging make up in s3 for the actors whose caracters are by now in their 50s or 60s isn't the most convincing, and that's certainly true for the majority of the female characters. (Karen being a standout in this regard - basically, they seem to have given the actress a grey wig, with her face looking like it did in the 1970s.) This feels weirdly nostalgic as it reminds me of the unconvincing age make up from the original Star Trek in that episode where you get Old Kirk and Old McCoy, looking nothing whatsoever like their actorly counterparts would some decades later. Otoh, it might simply be that the wonders of GCI have lessened aging makeup skills? Because some shows and movies were actually good with this in years past. I mean, take I, Claudius, made in the actual 1970s on not exactly a large budget. The aging makeup for Derek Jacobi, playing our titular hero from late teenagedom till his death, as well as for Sian Philipps, playing Livia from her mid 30s to her 90s, always felt very good and convincing to me. (I remember talking to someone who was surprised that Derek Jacobi is still alive, because "wasn't he an old man when he played Claudius in the 1970s?" I asked back who he thought played young Claudius then, and he had a very duh moment.)
Aaannnyway, there are some very youthful looking middle aged people in season 3, but then again, some people in rl do age very late in life, and not because of botox.
On to personal storylines, which is where it gets too spoilery for above cut remarks.
( Spoilers want to go to Mars )
On another note, and speaking of the 1990s:
annaverse wrote a great post about the short but fascinating show American Gothic. *waves to
andraste and
jesuswasbatman*
This season is set partly in 1992, partly in 1995, and from an AU pov, it was fascinating to see what alternate or similar developments the show came up with. (Beyond faster technological developments courtesy of the ongoing space race; in this universe, NASA by the 1990s has become financially self sustaining courtesy of marketing their inventions originally made for the space program. This in turn meant electric cars, lap tops, touchscreens and emails happened a whole lot faster than in real life.) One way where society did not develop faster was regarding same sex relationships, which after being a subplot through two seasons involving one of the main astronaut characters becomes a main plot in s3. This is also connected to the general political American developments, which are partly different, partly parallel to rl events. (Re: Presidents - because Ted Kennedy does not go to Chappaquiddik as a result of the different moon landing fallout, he remains a viable Democratic candidate and wins against Nixon in 1972. Because he's Ted Kennedy in the 1970s, he still has sex scandals and a one term presidency, with Reagan coming in a term earlier. But Reagan isn't followed by George HW Bush, but by Gary Hart, who doesn't have a scandal and becomes a two terms president. In 1992, Bill Clinton is the Democratic nominee, but gets defeated by a (fictional) Republican candidate, who is President for the majority of season 3. The Republican party still has an evangelical wing, but so far, no Tea Party crazies have shown up. (Newt Gingrich was once mentioned in dialogue, but isn't Speaker, because with a Republican President instead of Clinton, the Democrats have the House.) Reagan doesn't seem to have been as big an influence as he was in our timeline. It feels a bit like the West Wing verse, where Democrats and Republicans are opponents and either party has jerks and backroom deals, but also a public service code and, oh eternal bliss, Fox News and the radicalisation going with same doesn't seem to exist. (There's a conservative network called Eagle News instead, but the brief clips shown so far aren't comparably poisonous and deranged.) I don't know whether that means Rupert Murdoch chose another career instead, but it certainly is another plus of this universe.
Now, so far the show while showing an increasing number of Russian characters has remained in the American pov, but it did provide some nods as to why the Soviet Union survived into 1995 instead of falling apart. Because of the Russians going to the moon first and throwing most of their money and energy into the ongoing space race, there is no Russian invasion to Afghanistan (presumably this means also no US backed Mujaheddin and no Taliban?), and Gorbachev's economic reforms actually work. (Otoh, no mention of German reunification. One hopes Putin remains stuck in Dresden among the Saxons.) (In rl, Putin was stationed in Dresden as a KGB official when the wall came down.) (It just occured to me: if there's no reunification and still a West and East Germany, one half of us is spared Sahra Wagenknecht. BLISS.)
Otoh, I was a bit slow; it took me most of the season to remember a certain spoilery rl event from the US in the 1990s which has a devastating and very appropriate for this new context parallel in the show in the finale. This despite the effect one show character is given a very similar background to the rl character he parallels. Anyway: you know how some AUs don't really bother with thinking their premise through because they just want one particular scenario? This is true for most of the "What if the Nazis won!" AUs I've seen and what makes them so annoying. I haven't come across one which didn't feel like the creator(s) wanted more than just a costume cosplay featuring the Evilest Villains (tm).) By contrast, this show so far does quite well with the increasing ripple effects.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Aaannnyway, there are some very youthful looking middle aged people in season 3, but then again, some people in rl do age very late in life, and not because of botox.
On to personal storylines, which is where it gets too spoilery for above cut remarks.
( Spoilers want to go to Mars )
On another note, and speaking of the 1990s:
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)