Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (Porthos by Chatona)
So, some years ago, I was very entertained by Dickensian, a tv miniseries that smashes various Charles Dickens canons into each other on a general prequel basis, i.e. lets their backstories take place simultanously and in connection to each other, with the death of Jacob Marley (which is a murder to be solved) as the narrative read thread holding the different stories together, by and large.

I was wondering whether this was possible with a 19th century French novelist as well, but got immediately sidetracked by thinking not of a fusion of canons from the same novelist but two of the best known novels of the two romantic titans, to wit: a Les Miserables/Count of Monte Christo crossover. I mean, Javert's bound to have done some police work in the time jump between Valjean and Cosette entering the nunnery and leaving it again, or even after but pre ending that's unrelated to Valjean and/or the 1832 uprising, and there are the various murders among the Villefort family to be solved, to pick the most obvious possible intersection. Valjean would disapprove of the Count's grand revenge scheme even before there's lethal collateral damage, of course, but otoh they could relate about lengthy prison sentences and kindly clergymen who change your life. Edmond/the Count would not understand why Valjean doesn't solve his Javert and Thenadier problems by a complicated scheme during which one is set against the other. Albert de Morcerf and Franz d'Epinay could hang out with Marius and compete in well meaning cluelessness. And maybe what Eponine needs to distract her from unrequited love to Marius is a flirt with Eugenie Danglars when the later catches her stealing?
selenak: (Richelieu by Lost_Spook)
A few monts back, someone mentioned to me the BBC was planning on a Three Musketeers tv series. The cast and something about the content has now been announced, and I am... cautiously optimistic? I mean, there is still a godawful hangover from the horrid 90s Disney version in the form of D'Artagnan wanting to avenge his father (his father is perfectly alive and well in Gascogny, damm it!), but everything else sounds actually Dumasian. Constance is actually a) married, and b) not a lady-in-waiting or in any way a noble. Aramis, played by our ex-Lancelot from Merlin and ex-Isaac from Heroes, is described as "Aramis has an effortless charm which leads him in and out of love. Despite this, he is a shrewd pragmatist who is a ferocious in battle and commands a key place in the brotherhood", which should be nice for Santiago to perform. D'Artagnan himself is played by Luke Pasqualino, who was Paolo in The Borgias, but let's face it, my main interest in any Musketeers version are Milady and Monsieur le Cardinal, and here's what the BBC has to say about them:

Cardinal Richelieu (Capaldi), while striving to achieve his vision of a thoroughly modern France, is a shadowy character who will stop at nothing to achieve his objectives. Milady (McCoy) is the Cardinal’s secret weapon, the most mysterious and beautiful of villains whose motives are often concealed.

First of all, hooray for Peter Capaldi as Richelieu! And huzzah for a Richelieu who sounds as if he's actually a cross between Dumas and history for a change instead of a Hollywood Evil Vizier who wants the throne for himself (did I mention yet I hate and despise the stupid stupid 90s movie which intented this? As for the most recent versions, see this post). "Wants a modern France" and "stops at nothing to achieve his objectives" both are totally true and should make him a good antagonist. And I don't think I've seen Maimie McCoy before, but "mysterious motives" sound as if she's allowed to have layers (I mean, I love Dumas' splendid villainess, and I've come to loathe Athos and the way he treated her over the years, but it would be nice she got to have her own agenda beyond being a good agent for the Cardinal and wanting vengeance on D'Artagnan in the later stages of the story.)

Speaking of media versions remotely based on novels by 19th century French novelists, I've now seen the film version of Les Miserables. Obligatory background announcement: I've read the novel once, decades ago, in German; have seen the musical on stage only once as well; do have the original English production CD, but no other; have however heard Philip Quast because [personal profile] andraste is a fan and included his version of Stars in a B5 or Alias soundmix, I can't remember which one. Oh, and I have seen a French film version starring Lino Ventura as Valjean. So, I know my main characters but am not by any means an expert or even a well read/heard fan. Anyway, as for the film, Anne Hathaway did deserve her Oscar, I thought Hugh Jackman was excellent as Valjean, too, the Thenardiers looked as if they'd wandered in from a Tim Burton movie, which clashed with the film otherwise trying for a more realistic look, their daughter Eponine likewise had a weirdly stagey costume only in her case it was the corset that smacked of artificiality, everyone else's costumes were fine. I appreciated they included Javert trying to resign/getting fired when he thinks he accused M. Madeleine/Valjean unjustly in the film, because that's such a key scene in the book and I found it weird the musical had omitted it. Apropos Javert, yes, Russell Crowe was not made for singing, but I've heard worse. The whole approach of casting actors and using their actual voices instead of going for singers (except for the supporting parts) reminded me of the Buffy episode Once More With Feeling, and that's not a negative observation. Let's see, what else? Cosette is such a thankless role, but Amanda Seyfried and the kid made the best of it and actually Valjean repeatedly telling her to come inside suddenly reminded me of another Hugo father and daughter pair, Rigoletto and Gilda. The revolutionaries were young and pretty and not easily distinguishable without having read the book. Eddie Remayne. really made Marius less self involved than many a Marius, even though the musical gives him less reason than book!Marius has for his behaviour towards Valjean post sewers. (In the book, Marius assumes, and has every reason to believe, that Valjean has just killed Javert and robbed the unknown "Monsieur Madelaine"'s money until he learns otherwise, so it's not just the deepset snobbery of "convict? Ew!" that causes him to agree Cosette should see less to nothing of Valjean.) Most importantly, he delivers what is the one song in this musical which makes me cry every time for personal reasons, "Empty Chairs on Empty Tables". (Nothing to do with French revolutionaries. Like I said, it's personal.) Oh, and because time has to fly in a musical, we get Valjean's decline and death happening superfast instead of the longer time the novel allows him; it occurs to me that the whole dying of a broken heart thing usually happens to female characters in 19th century novels, so is it gender bending Valjean does it? (Not a serious question.)

So, as a non-Les Mis fan: I enjoyed watching, won't buy the soundtrack or the dvd, but may tune in if I catch it on tv in a few years. Wouldn't reccommend it as a must watch to other people, but if you like movie musicals and grand emotion, you'll enjoy it more likely than not.

Lastly, a sudden thought: has anyone ever written a Count of Monte Cristo/Les Mis crossover? Because I have this image of Edmond Dantes/The Count and Valjean looking at each other, taking each other's reactions to imprisonment and sudden money afterwards in and saying simultanously: "Seriously?"
selenak: (Ray and Shaz by Kathyh)
The Christmas special of Call the Midwife was lovely. Spoilers ensue. )

In Yuletide news, I got some lovely comments on both stories by now; more on the official assignment than on the treat, but that was to be expected because of the fandoms in question. Also, I spotted the assignment story recced on the journal of someone who is a complete stranger, which is extra thrilling. For all the fretting, that's the charm of the anonymous period before the reveal: getting comments, and perhaps being recced, solely on the basis of the story itself.

I haven't had the chance to watch the film version of Les Miserables yet for the simple reason it hasn't been released in Bamberg (but I'm off to Munich again next week, which is when I'll also go watch The Hobbit for a second time in the undubbed version). However, being familiar with both the novel and the musical meant I've been leisurely reading through reviews. Some comments about Marius reminded me that Hugo is a good example of reader/viewer training clashing with authorial intent, and not in the usual way. Because I don't think Marius is meant to be the young romantic hero of the tale (and failing at it). Hugo, writing from exile on his channel island because of his anti-Napoleon-III. pamphlet Napoleon Le Petit, isn't exactly charitable towards Marius ; spoilers for Les Mis ensue ) And yet Marius is still the most sympathetic variation of a certain type that shows up in The Hunchback of Notre Dame and Le Roi s'amuse, the drama which forms the basis of Verdi's opera Rigoletto (Verdi had to transport the whole plot to Mantua and make the king a duke in order to get around the censor), always in conjunction with an amazing woman in unrequited love with him. Spoilers for Notre Dame and Rigoletto ensue, along with ramblings on a favourite Hugo trope. )

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 09:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios