Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (Richard III. by Vexana_Sky)
This was given to me by [personal profile] cahn; takes place in an AU Renaissance (specifics to follow) in which Byantium never fell and instead became the last remaining superpower standing, gobling up most other countries (and is therefore the - off page - Big Bad of the story), while our heroes are a bunch of OCs - a Welsh wizard, a Greek mercenary who's really the last survivor of a previous dynasty, an Italian (female) doctor from Florence and a German science-minded weapons engineer plus mercenary who bears the hilarious-in-German-sounding designation "Fachritter", is otherwise called Gregory of Bavaria and is my favourite.

Spoilers have heard the chimes at midnight )
selenak: (Agnes Dürer)
In which the series continues to develop promisingly.

Everything has a price )
selenak: (Young Elizabeth by Misbegotten)
I now had the chance to watch the first two episodes of The Serpent Queen, the new tv series about Catherine de' Medici, and am delighted so far. Now did have cautious hopes, because the biography it's based on, by Leonie Frieda, is reasonably good, the trailer was entertaining, and Samantha Morton as Catherine was promising.

Only vaguely spoilery report on the first two episodes )

So much did I like the first two episodes that I nominated the show as a Yuletide fandom. Here's hoping it will continue as good!
selenak: (Borgias by Andrivete)
This is a marvellous essay about the poetry, novels and general work of Roz Kaveny (used to be [personal profile] rozk on lj).

Also, the talk about Dürer has reminded me I wanted to do this: have some Dürer icons, the first two of which featuring sketches he made of two people of African origin, in 1508 and 1521 respectively, more about this here. We know the name of the woman - she was Katharina, 20 years old servant of Portueguese representative João Brandão, at whose house Dürer was staying when travelling to Antwerpes. The next icon is of Dürer himself, his most famous self portrait, the original of which is just fifteen minutes away from where I live here in Munich. Then there's Jakob Fugger, the most influentual merchant of his time (and his time included the Medici), and an intimate sketch Dürer made of his wife, which is why it's titled "Mein Agnes".


D_rer_-_WOCD_rer_-_MOC
D_rer


800px-Agnes_Duerer_1494Jakob_Fugger

Anyone who wants to use these, feel free, just credit me.
selenak: (Borgias by Andrivete)
Some weeks back doing a meme reminded me that I never got around to watching Da Vinci’s Demons. Also, Netflix had put up the first season of Medici: Masters of Florence, which is an Italian-American coproduction. (A second season is in production.) So I marathoned through two series which had Renaissance Florence as a central location, and members of the Medici family in important roles. Result: I was entertained, but wouldn’t call either one a must.

I Medici/ Medici: Masters of Florence is the more conventional of the two, a straightforward historical. Spoilers have always believed in Florence. ) I hear the second season will skip two decades and will bring us to Lorenzo and his brother Guiliano and the Pazzi Conspiracy, i.e. the very events the first season of Da Vinci’s Demons uses as background. Presumably without Leonardo da Vinci.

To get the most obvious out of the way first, Da Vinci’s Demons does not feature any literal demons. (Lots of metaphorical ones, though.) It is historical fantasy, but the supernatural elements mostly consist of telepathy, prophecy and Vlad Tepes, Dracula himself, having an uncanny ability to survive things which kill other people. (He shows up in season 1 and season 3 and is played gloriously over the top by Paul Rhys. Since geography in Da Vinci’s Demons is as excentric as history, trips to Romania and back pose no problem for our heroes.)

What Da Vinci’s Demons also is: batshit, to use a fannish term. A very entertaining kind of crazy, with Jacobean and modern tropes thrown in to a wild mixture. Secret societies! (Two of them are basically responsible for most major plot twists.) Evil twins! Surprise other relations! Double (and triple) agents! Lots of assasinations (with various degrees of success)! Revennnnnge! Enemies turning allies! Daddy issues! Evil clerics! Evil military overlords! Orgies! And so on, and so forth. The cinematography matches. Also, the score by Bear McCreary (he who gave us the music for Battlestar Galactica, The Sarah Connor Chronicles and Black Sails) is gorgeous.

Spoilers were probably planted by the Sons of Mithras to foil the Enemies of Men only to be seen in a vision by Leonardo da Vinci )
selenak: (Borgias by Andrivete)
Every now and then, there are art exhibitions that make you - well, me - squee like a fan who has just been given tickets to a concert of their favourite musician, a new book from their favourite author, a new episode of their favourite show, you get the picture. Or pictures. The exhibition in question is called Dürer - Cranach - Holbein: The Discovery of Man: German Portraiture around 1500, was earlier in Vienna and will stay with us in Munich until January. While the three painters named in the title are undoubtedly the stars of the exhbition, there are a great many others represented, painters I vaguely knew the names of and some I had never heard of before, creating a rich context and showing that while those three were certainly extraordinary, portraiture as a whole florished wonderfully in the era. The faces are so extraordinarily alive for the most part, and if, as Dürer once wrote, one of the goals of art is to preserve life beyond death, well, they certainly succeeded. Rich burghers from Augsburg or Nuremberg, two servants (husband and wife, names unknown) from Henry VIII.s court who somehow must have endeared themselves to Holbein so he painted them small double portraits to put in a box, Dürer painting his old master's face after the later's death, a Venetian girl, a young man whose name has long gone - it's fantastic to behold.

Mind you: I find Holbein in general is better with the men than with the women. His Jane Seymour portrait, for example, compared with his portrait of the French ambassador, is so very bland. Cranach and his sharp angles and the heads that make you feel they're just a bit out of proportion with the body strikes me as the most medieval of the three, though in a compelling way. And Dürer is, hands down, the one painter to rule them all. Which isn't news, obviously, but it really is true. I was fascinated that the exhbition didn't choose to use one of his most famous self portraits which we do have in Munich (the one with the fur) and instead went for various family portraits (including one of his younger brother I hadn't seen before), not just his famous portrait of Jacob Fugger but various other studies of the man, and some portraits of women that showcase that female faces could be rendered as compelling (well, he didn't have Henry VIII. in his neck, but still, looking at you, Hans H.):


http://hypo-kunsthalle.de/newweb/dch/bild07.jpg


http://hypo-kunsthalle.de/newweb/dch/bild01.jpg

In conclusion: should you be in Munich before January next year, visit this exhibition by any means possible.

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 11:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios