Auld Long Syne
Dec. 30th, 2004 12:37 pmI'll be offline from this evening till January 1st at the earliest or January 3rd at the latest, so this is my Happy New Year post. I'm really glad to have met everyone I've met in 2004 (even though some of you are really good at making me brush up my Beckett) , and to have kept all my older friendships.
So, fannish discoveries of 2004:
- Alias: is not a replacement of the Jossverse shows, but is fun, and has some interesting characters; won't break my heart, but keeps me entertained
- Battlestar Galactica (2003): based strictly on what I've seen so far, could be the next show I fall in love and get obsessed with; if it gets cancelled, expect Firefly-style cries of frustration
- Spooks: loved the first season, am examining my Christmas-emptied budget and contemplating aquiring the second, for it is truly a mighty fine thing, the best from the UK since Ultraviolet
-
theatrical_muse: multi-fandom roleplaying insanity which takes up too much time but is ever so rewarding.
And since everyone is bound to post New Year's resolutions, I'll be contrary and make resolutions about what I won't do in 2005 (fanlife-wise):
1.) I won't apply to play Arvin Sloane at
theatrical_muse. For starters, I don't have the time. Secondly, the fourth season starts next week and I won't be able to watch it, since I'm in Germany. Thirdly, get thee gone, evil middle-aged genius with thy compellingly twisted emotional life, I can resist thine attraction.
2.) I won't apply to play Winn Adami there, either. See above for reason No.1. Fun as it might be to interact with the other DS9 muses and have a post-Fire Caves Winn mess mightily with everyone's perception of the prophets, I have other things to do. Vade retro, your Eminence.
3.) I won't write a Centauri version of Les Liasons Dangereuses, starring Vir as Madame de Tourvel and Mariel as Valmont, no matter how well that actually fits with the bookverse. Reason No.1, as always, and secondly, who is supposed to be the gender-bend Marquise de Merteuil then? Not Londo, that's for sure.
4.) I shall also resist any temptation coming my way to write a gigantic Sarah Sisko coming back from the dead to get the Prophets opus. No time. Also, avoid the lure of venting pet annoyances via characters that aren't defined by the show due to minimal screen time, for this way lies Mary Sue.
5.) I shall not write either the Very Wrong Alias pairing or the Just As Wrong Alias Threesome I have some Horribly Wrong ideas for. They just wouldn't. Unless on drugs. I tell you, they wouldn't. And anyway, I'm not really good with sex.
***
Now that's settled: while waiting for more Battlestar Galactica episodes from
hmpf, I had a cautious look at what fanfic already exists. So far, the best thing I found is from Jossverse and Farscape veteran
butterflykiki, and called "Rational(e)". Set immediately post-miniseries and deals with Gaius Baltar and Six. Speaking of...
6.) I shall not pester any of my lj friends to play Baltar (new Galactica version) or Six on
theatrical_muse just so Baltar and John Crichton can discuss what it's like to live with a chip in the head and an invisible, err, friend to talk to. Even though they have other stuff in common as well (scientists, high body count, loss of world). Also, my desire for a Six/Harvey conversation shall remain equally unfulfilled.
So, fannish discoveries of 2004:
- Alias: is not a replacement of the Jossverse shows, but is fun, and has some interesting characters; won't break my heart, but keeps me entertained
- Battlestar Galactica (2003): based strictly on what I've seen so far, could be the next show I fall in love and get obsessed with; if it gets cancelled, expect Firefly-style cries of frustration
- Spooks: loved the first season, am examining my Christmas-emptied budget and contemplating aquiring the second, for it is truly a mighty fine thing, the best from the UK since Ultraviolet
-
And since everyone is bound to post New Year's resolutions, I'll be contrary and make resolutions about what I won't do in 2005 (fanlife-wise):
1.) I won't apply to play Arvin Sloane at
2.) I won't apply to play Winn Adami there, either. See above for reason No.1. Fun as it might be to interact with the other DS9 muses and have a post-Fire Caves Winn mess mightily with everyone's perception of the prophets, I have other things to do. Vade retro, your Eminence.
3.) I won't write a Centauri version of Les Liasons Dangereuses, starring Vir as Madame de Tourvel and Mariel as Valmont, no matter how well that actually fits with the bookverse. Reason No.1, as always, and secondly, who is supposed to be the gender-bend Marquise de Merteuil then? Not Londo, that's for sure.
4.) I shall also resist any temptation coming my way to write a gigantic Sarah Sisko coming back from the dead to get the Prophets opus. No time. Also, avoid the lure of venting pet annoyances via characters that aren't defined by the show due to minimal screen time, for this way lies Mary Sue.
5.) I shall not write either the Very Wrong Alias pairing or the Just As Wrong Alias Threesome I have some Horribly Wrong ideas for. They just wouldn't. Unless on drugs. I tell you, they wouldn't. And anyway, I'm not really good with sex.
***
Now that's settled: while waiting for more Battlestar Galactica episodes from
6.) I shall not pester any of my lj friends to play Baltar (new Galactica version) or Six on
no subject
Date: 2004-12-30 01:50 pm (UTC)You'd have to work hard to get John Crichton to talk about his invisible friend, anyway. The gang is in B5-verse now, btw.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-30 02:09 pm (UTC)Also: but wouldn't it be good if John could share with someone who has the same problem? *veg*
no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 11:16 pm (UTC)DOWN, plotbunnies! I don't actually know who John Crichton is, not that that would matter really...
*g*
no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 05:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-08 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-30 05:31 pm (UTC)Glad you enjoyed it *eg*. Just to tempt you further there's an episode with Alexander Siddig in Series Two...
I won't write a Centauri version of Les Liasons Dangereuses, starring Vir as Madame de Tourvel and Mariel as Valmont, no matter how well that actually fits with the bookverse.
Oh go on. You know you want to.
Have a very happy New Year.
happy new year. . .
Date: 2004-12-30 06:24 pm (UTC)Re: happy new year. . .
Date: 2004-12-30 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-30 07:31 pm (UTC)Don't be silly, of course you are! *g*
no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-30 08:14 pm (UTC)Yes you will. Because I'll pay you. With sweeties.
starring Vir as Madame de Tourvel and Mariel as Valmont, no matter how well that actually fits with the bookverse. Reason No.1, as always, and secondly, who is supposed to be the gender-bend Marquise de Merteuil then? Not Londo, that's for sure.
G'Kar, of course. Hell, JMS almost wrote that one (complete with tentacle!pr0n) but then chickened out. Gender-bend G'Kar: the way it was meant to be...
no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 11:49 am (UTC)*tries to hold on to resolution*
no subject
Date: 2004-12-30 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 11:49 am (UTC)No I won't no I won't no I won't....
no subject
Date: 2004-12-30 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-31 11:13 pm (UTC)Happy New Year, and I'm glad to have met you as well! *glomps Londo, too*
no subject
Date: 2005-01-02 11:52 am (UTC)Happy New Year, and Londo is always delighted to be glomped.*g*
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-08 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-08 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-09 01:42 pm (UTC)(Pet peeve in this category for me is Janeway/Seven...)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-09 01:52 pm (UTC)With Janeway/Seven, I can see the chemistry but aside from the fact Janeway is Seven's mentor and parental figure, the same problem applies that does for every single romantic relationship between Janeway and any other member of her crew: it would be both against regulations and against her personal code of ethics. (Those regulations are there for a reason - a commanding officer just has too much opportunity to abuse his/her position if sexual relationships with a subordinate are permitted.) So, no.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-09 02:17 pm (UTC)The only person on Voyager I can see who Janeway might be able to sleep with (under this heading) is Chakotay--and that because he has been a captain on his own before. But even there... *shakes head* I can see them sleeping together in "Resolutions", because they're not in the ship's heirarchy any more, though.
Gah. Janeway's love life. :) She either gets no sex (except holographic or random-alien-of-the-week, and not much of that) as on the show, or gets paired with every darned crewman aboard, as in fanfic.
(Can you tell I've been reading VOY fic today?)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-03 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-03 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 09:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 09:46 am (UTC)And yes, much with the bsg love, and impatient waiting for more episodes here!
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 09:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 12:37 pm (UTC)are you *aheming* them or are they being shipped?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-09 02:19 pm (UTC)