Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (Bruce and Tony by Corelite)
So, I've stopped watching Downton Abbey two seasons ago. But as soon as I saw this crossovery, I knew I'd read it, and did with ever greater joy, for verily, idea and execution are golden.

Tony Stark Meets an Extremely Unimpressed Time Traveler, or, Thomas Barrow Makes a Surprisingly Good 21st Century Butler (87671 words) by Alex51324
Chapters: 3/3
Fandom: Downton Abbey, The Avengers (Marvel Movies)
Rating: Teen And Up Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Thomas Barrow/Tony Stark
Characters: Thomas Barrow, Tony Stark, Steve Rogers
Additional Tags: Time Travel, Butlers, Crossover
Summary:

In which Tony Stark ditches a boring party, makes an addition to the household staff, throws a much better party, and tries not to sexually harass his new butler.

Or,In which Thomas Barrow has a little trouble getting home from the pub, is generally unimpressed with many aspects of the 21st century, never thought of himself as a conservative dresser before, and may or may not be falling in lust with his new employer.

tl:dr: Thanks to time travel, Thomas Barrow becomes the Avengers' butler.



The one thing you have to handwave is that Downton Abbey is actually referenced in Iron Man III, complete with clips (Tony's chauffeur/bodyguard Happy Hogan is a fan), but otherwise, this is perfect. Not least because it uses the ensemble well, not just the two main characters, and has everyone in character. It's funny and touching in turns and the dialogue is golden.
selenak: (Money by Distempera)
Well, I do. That is to say, I check out the list of posted Yuletide fandoms quite often, and mentally make notes about which fandoms to check out first once the archive gets opened. There are already four B5 stories and two Breaking Bad tales. And I THINK I've spotted the so-far-one-story-fandom which might be my gift, though of course I can't be sure. As for "huh, didn't think someone would write this this year, but it looks like someone did" pleasant surprises, did I spot A Place of Greater Safety on the list with one story? Why yes, I did. Must check out Hilary Mantel inspired French Revolution fanfic as soon as I can. And so forth.

It's a distraction from fretting about the fate of my own two tales, at any rate.:) The joy and peril of Yuletide is that you get to write rare fandoms and have a chance of having those stories read by more than five people, plus you're challenged to tackle themes which might be outside your usual parameters, but - what if the recipient had something else in mind and leaves nothing but a polite "thanks for writing"/ hardly anyone else bothers to check out the tale because there are so many others/ the format you picked doesn't work in the way you hoped it would/the characters you focus on aren't the characters anyone else is interested in/et cetera. You know, the usual. Ah, well. I might as well practice singing "two weeks more" to the Les Mis tune of One Day More, since that film version is another thing to look forward to. And speaking of filk songs, here is a fun one, Xena by way of Gilbert and Sullivan.

Something else distracting to make you smile among worries trivial and tremendous (i.e. the rest of the world): Breaking Abbey, the one and only Downton Abbey/Breaking Bad crossover. Written by Vince Gilligan and starring Thomas (wearing the Jesse Pinkman look quite well), Carson (clearly born to be Mike in another life) and His Lordship (Hugh Bonneville's Walter White impression is hysterical). Mind you, clearly the Downton Abbey character BORN to make a career in the drug trade is the Dowager Countess, for who could ever defeat her?
selenak: (Alex Drake by Renestarko)
Evil lingering cold is evil. And tomorrow a cousin's wedding, too.

On the cheerful side of things, The Bletchley Circle was as great as advertised. The basic premise - four women who used to be among the 80% female part of Bletchley Park employees (aka busy breaking codes in WWII) team up again to solve a case of murders nine years after the war is over and they've tried, with varying success, to cope with "ordinary" life in the 50s - should be good for a longer series, but if the miniseries of three parts i all there'll ever be, I'll still be content because it was fabulous. Not flawless - the third part was weaker than the first two, since the denouement depended on a very clever and sensible character doing something eminently stupid - but the good far outweighed this: the four women (Susan, Millie, Jean and Lucy) were all competent, interesting, with distinct personalities, and the revival of their war time comraderie under the very different circumstances they're now in was compelling.

With all the hiati and season premieres, it occurs to me that I've now dropped three shows I used to watch, all in the same year - Fringe, Dexter and now Downton Abbey. DA is painless, Fringe had such a lot going for it that dropping it leaves the kind of ache that dropping Heroes caused me a while back, but just as in that case, it has become necessary, and the decline of Dexter in s6 (though the rot set in earlier than that) still infuriates me.

It also makes me nervous because Homeland had its season premiere last night (haven't had a chance to watch yet, will do so soon), and the first season for me was terrific but also good in a way that makes me wonder whether this particular premise is sustainable for more than one season, and I should hate to see it decline the way Dexter did. I'll access my inner optimist soon!

Maybe, cold aside, I feel a bit in the doldrums because we've been doing media tie ins over at b5_revisited for a while now, having exhausted all the on screen canon, and while that was fine when we were talking about the telepath trilogy, it's become depressing for the most part since, because I dislike so much about the the Centauri trilogy (oh my beloved Centauri!), and of the JMS and Fiona Avery short stories, I loved The Shadow of his Thoughts, was fine with Genius Loci, but then came the appalling Space, Time and the Incurable Romantic and now Ms. Avery's story True Seeker, which I didn't know before, turns out to contain more coals than gems as well. So that meant I've been writing negative reviews for weeks now. And it's depressing. I don't like doing that, I really don't, it's just that hardly anyone else writes reviews at all and it's the Babylonverse which I still love discussing because of my ongoing affection for the show proper. But it's incredibly depressing. :( ...so much more fun to squee, I can't tell you. Speaking of which:

Discword/Avengers crossover of genius: Ankh-Morpork, Avenged. Which absolutely had to happen. It made my Monday.
selenak: (Shadows - Saava)
Bad news to wake up to: Michael O'Hare has died. What is it about the B5 cast and far too early mortality? Damn. I remember when some years ago people on my flist started to watch B5 and complained about Sinclair being Kirkian, and I was confused because I remembered him as the exact opposite, and then I did a rewatch and realised where the problem lay: the Sinclair I recalled is the one from about A Flagfull of Stars onwards, when the writing became adjusted to the actor. Very early Sinclair is written more in the action hero vein and O'Hare isn't good at it (while later Bruce Boxleitner will be), but what he is good at conveying is quiet thoughtfulness and gravitas, and later season 1 Sinclair has this. His best performance to me though remains his last as Sinclair: the War Without End two parter in season 3 where Sinclair's story comes to the end that is simultanously a beginning in one of the best and in retrospect utterly sense making plot twists I've seen. Now that the actor is gone, the scene that most haunts me is the one where Sinclair whispers "goodbye, Michael" in part I, and I would post that clip if I could find it on YouTube, which unfortunately I couldn't. There is such affection and sadness in O'Hare's voice that it believes anyone calling him wooden, and the knowledge he'll never see his friend again. I've never felt more like Michael Garibaldi.


***

You know, I think I'll stop watching Downton Abbey. I always thought that if something gives you more disgruntlement than viewing pleasure, it's time to get out rather than hang on and complain, and I might have reached that stage, with my inner Jacobin more alert than ever every second a member of the Crawley family is on screen. Spoilery grumblings to follow. ) The one thing of academic interest to me is that it occurred to me DA actually offers an answer to something I wondered last when marathoning The West Wing some years ago. Back then, I was reminded that while you get the occasional conservative characters written by liberal writers meant as sympathetic (you also get villains, but really, most of the Republicans showing up on WW weren't but were written as honorable and dedicated as our democratic regulars, notably Ainsley and The Better John McCain in the last season), I couldn't think of a liberal character meant as sympathetic and written by a conservative writer. Well, now I can, because Downton Abbey gave us Tom Branson the socialist (ex-) chauffeur, and Julian Fellowes, a conservative writer, assuredly means him to be sympathetic. Alas, this also shows up Fellowes' weaknesses like a writer like no one's business. I mean, I admit I was charmed by scenes that reminded me of a Likeadeuce story ), but the scene with Sybil when they're alone and he says something spoilery ) not only reminded me of how badly written Branson/Sybil was the last season but made me suspect Fellowes has no idea of how a working class boy/upper class girl relationship could possibly work beyond vague memories of having once watched Look Back In Anger. Oh dear oh dear oh dear.

Shirley McLaine, when actually given something to do, rose to the challenge and reminded me of having once attended a New Year's show she gave in Munich only a few years ago (singing, dancing, narrating, the stamina of the woman in her 70s is amazing), but I find the Dowager Duchess' quips are getting old and thus I really have no more reason to watch. Beyond spiting the snobbish reviewer from the Guardian some weeks ago, and that's not enough incentive. Life is short. On to other shows! I've heard great things about The Bletchley Circle.

****

Prometheus vid rec: Paradise (Comes At A Prize). Excellent vid focusing on Elizabeth Shaw, David, Holloway, Wayland and the creators. Creepiness, messed up family and created-creators relationships and assorted imagery abounds.
selenak: (Scarlett by Olde_fashioned)
Another new season I look forward to, with some trepidation because the first one was so good and I can't know yet whether this will be the type of show who does one perfect season and then flounders or the type of show which builds on its initial success and becomes even better, is s2 of Homeland, and there is a trailer now. I'm morbidly amused that they use the same music as Downton Abbey, i.e. an a capella rendition of I'll be watching you, only Homeland is fully aware the song is supposed to be creepy, not romantic, and uses that to full effect. Also CARRRRIIIEEEE. I don't know who, it might have been abigail_n, when reviewing the show smartly said that while the audience starts empathizing with Brodie and disliking Carrie (whose flaws, and not "heroic" or cutesy flaws but genuinely appalling ones, are if anything highlighted in the pilot), and by the time the show ends, the reverse was true at least for her (and also for me) simply by a) the way we've been getting to know both characters and b) plot developments. Anyway, Damian Lewis is a fabulous actor, no question about, but Claire Danes' Carrie is my main character draw for the second season.

Speaking of Downton Abbey, I had a recent moment where a reviewer you want to agree with is so jerky about it that you instinctively side with the maligned party. Well, I did. This came in the (adoringly positive) review of Parade's End, starring Benedict Cumberbatch, which the reviewer starts by slamming not only Downton Abbey but also anyone who enjoys Downton Abbey: Any diehard Downton fans tuning in to BBC2 on Friday night, hoping for a fun, easy, schmaltzy, pretty, faintly rewarding hour or so, or so-so, of bodiced bitchery, and a bit of intrigue telegraphed only by railway hooters and wobbly cartoon finger-signs pointing to "the bad 'un", will have been royally disappointed. That's the first piece of excellent news about Parade's End.

Now, I wrote a very critical review of Downton Abbey's second second season recently. And if anyone said it's entertaining schlock with class snobbery a mile wide, I'd agree immediately. But reading this particular review (which could have been written without any DA reference at all, since it's about a miniseries based on four legendary novels which have nothing to with with Downton Abbey whatsoever) made me suddenly look forward to yet another season of "bodiced bitchery" while not in a hurry to look for Parade's End because if there's one thing I absolutely can't stand, it's this type of condescension. You know, Euan Ferguson, it's entirely possible to enjoy both "fun, easy schmaltz" and layered tv both. You're not thrown out of the club of the literati because of that.

Then again, maybe Ferguson felt the need for a Downton Abbey slam because Parade's End's star, Benedict Cumberbatch, recently managed the rare feat to diss the show and to behave as Matthew Crawley and the Earl his future father-in-law personified, moaning about the burden of his privilege and threatening to go America where the posh aren't bashed. This resulted in various utterings by other people, the most funny of which was this article (tweeted by Dan Stevens, who plays Matthew, without comment). "Fetch the caviar, it's Rinkydink Curdlesnoot, the great ponce" is what will come to (my) mind when seeing the quondam Sherlock from now on, because it's the best quote ever. This being said, Bimpleswitch Wafflechops (tm article) is a good actor, Tom Stoppard is a great writer, and so was Ford Maddox Ford on whose novels the miniseries is based, so I'll look forward to seeing it regardless. But I'd look forward to it even more if Euan Ferguson hadn't praised it first.
selenak: (Breaking Bad by Wicked Signs)
Five characters who should quit their jobs (and why).


1.) Severus Snape (Harry Potter). During the time canon was still open, of course. Let’s face it, Snape was a fascinating character but a really horrible teacher, even if you discount anything to do with Harry. The two most glaring proofs about Snape’s unsuitability as a teacher that come to mind are that he managed to terrorize Neville Longbottom so much that he, not, say, Bellatrix Lestrange who drove Neville’s parents insane, became Neville’s greatest fear, and that, as opposed to a certain fanfic subgenre, he treated an eager student like Hermione with contempt, best summed up in his reaction to the time when her teeth were bespelled into growing to gigantic proportions. Instead of helping her, he said “I can’t see any difference”. Basically, Snape and the students made each other miserable through the years, and yes, that was also Dumbledore’s fault for keeping him in this job instead of, say, giving him the magical equivalent of an university scholarship (Snape was brilliant at potions, no question, and would have thrived at only having to do research instead of teaching). But Snape was an adult, and really: he should have quit his job.

2.) Deb’s psychiatrist whose name I refuse to remember (Dexter): worst. Therapist. Ever. If you watched the horror that was season 6, you know what I mean. There is no excuse. After what she told Deb, she should never be allowed to treat another patient again.

3.) Jesse Pinkman (Breaking Bad). His current job is being a drug manufacturer and dealer, at which he’s grown ever more efficient in the course of the show, so quitting it is in the general interest, but it’s also in Jesse’s. As opposed to the show’s main character, it’s not yet too late for him and he still has something of a conscience, so quitting, while extremely unlikely right now, isn’t impossible. Here’s hoping.

4.) John Sheridan (Babylon 5). Good war commanders do not necessarily make good political leaders in peace time (or what passes for peace time at a galactic saga). Sheridan proved in the fifth season of B5 he was a case in point, even if his wife and his author think otherwise. By quitting, he would not only make room for a more capable president but also minimize his opportunities to play tasteless pranks on reporters with the misfortune of interviewing him, so that would be another plus.

5.) Thomas (Downton Abbey). I say this against my own viewing interest, because in the second season, O’Brien and Thomas became my favourite characters by virtue of not making me think “off with their heads” and “this isn’t romance, buddy, it’s stalking” respectively, and also for gaining layers in regards to s1 as opposed to losing them. Still. Instead of serving as another illustration of What Happens To The Lower Classes If They Forget Their Place And Want More Without Asking The Upper Classes For Support First, Thomas should quit his job and write a biting satiric novel, or become an impresario. He’s got business skills, scheming talent, organization talent, an acid tongue and a surpressed and only sometimes emerging romantic streak. He and Tin Pan Alley in the 1920s are practically made for each other.
selenak: (Abigail Brand by Handyhunter)
The nice thing about flawed fandoms is that there's almost inevitably more fanfic inspired by them than by terrific, close to perfect sources.

As I looked: have some Downton Abbey fic:


With grace in all she offers: Mary contemplates Lavinia.


In my imagination : Edward Courtenay (for verily, fanfic tells me how a character only in one episode is named, for which I'm grateful, and it seems Julian Fellowes had a little Plantagenet-Tudor in joke with the name of the officer from episode 2.02) and Thomas.

A far, far better thing: excellent O'Brien character exploration! Also puts the ensemble to good use, and her guilty obsessive love for Cora, and has awesome snarky scenes with Thomas, but really: O'Brien character exploration makes me happy.

Like clockwork: As does this backstory for Thomas, which neatly avoids woobiefication while still providing quite plausible context for The Portrait Of A Ruthless Schemer As An Adolescent In Training.

While I was at the AO3, I couldn't resist sneaking over to the Remix archive. Of course, the stories are yet unrevealed, but as I found you can see which fandoms people have already posted in . Looks like there'll be plenty to read for me in two weeks.

ETA: Disability and Breaking Bad is a fantastic meta post on how the show (BB, that is) uses the character of Walter Junior.

And lastly, I've been wavering which Avengers icon from the soon to hit the cinemas movie I'll acquire, but you know, I think I'll be looking for one featuring the Black Widow. Behold Natasha:


selenak: (Gentlemen of the Theatre by Kathyh)
In which I have at last a favourite character whom I'm rooting for, because Julian Fellowes inadvertendly manages to push every dormant Jacobin bone in my body with his writing for this season. (Note: the season, not the Christmas special, which wasn't on the dvds, so I haven't seen it.)

A working class hero is something to be... )
selenak: (Alicia and Diane - Winterfish)
See, I'm used to having the CIA presented as interfering baddies in shows centered around FBI agents, and the FBI presented as annoying interferers in shows centered around CIA agents, but I think The Good Wife has to be given pioneer credit for being the first show to make a recurring villain out of the U.S. Treasury.

Bitcoin for Dummies )


In other news, I felt like enjoying some costume drama, so I got around to watching the first season of Downton Abbey. (Before anyone mentions it in the comments: yes, I've heard the second season wasn't good by fannish osmosis.) For some reason I had assumed the show to be a spoof, Blackadder style, but it wasn't, it was played straight, and a very enjoyable Edwardian soap it was, too. Later I found out that the creator, Jullian Fellowes, was the scriptwriter for Gosford Park, which figures. It does a reasonably good job of acknowledging this is a society on the brink of change - and that change is necessary - though you still get the benevolent patriarch, and the bark-is-worse-than-her-bite dowager duchess. Still, I appreciated such details as Violet's medical knowledge and the way it was used, or the season long subplot of Sybil supporting Gwen's effort to become a secretary instead of staying a housemaid all her life. And of course Anna and Mr. Bates were a pair of after my Anne and Captain Wentworth loving heart.

Working on a Watsonian level but annoying on a Doylist one if you let yourself think about it: yes, we do get two sympathetic progressive and left-leaning characters - the socialist chauffeur and Sybil - but it's still a fact that the two servants who keep pointing out "why should our lives revolve around people who hardly know our name?" and that all this part of the family talk is hogwash given the peope from upstairs can fire you at any moment are the two villains of the season. And one of them is the only gay character around (well, except for a one episode guest star).

All this being said: the characters all come across as three dimensional, villains included, and that's no mean thing given how formulaic a series covering such well-tread ground could get.

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 23 456 7
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22 232425 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 10:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios