Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (Kitty Winter)
Can't decide whether I want this to be true or not. I mean, obviously I don't want Farage in my country: we've got our own blustery bigots, you can keep yours, Britain. But there's no danger of him actually getting German citizenship - married to a German or not, he'd have to prove several years of residency -, and the utter shamelessness of applying for it in order to keep the benefits of being an EU member after doing his best to ruin it for the rest of Britain makes for a good narrative. Also, I have fun imagining him trapped in endless bureaucracy, with every civil servant on whose desk his application for citizenship lands taking a special pleasure in flinging yet more red tape at Farage.
selenak: (Branagh by Dear_Prudence)
Let's face it, the producers/headwriters of this show called "British Politics" have finally lost it. They suck. There's such a thing as shades of grey characterisation and flawed characters, sure, but they still need to be believable. Look, we'd have gotten the point about how that lame Francis Urquart wannabe, Boris Johnson, just was after power already. But leading a breaking Europe campaign so he could be PM, with the plan being that the vote doesn't actually go through, that's already over the top. Now his face at the first public appearance when the vote actually went Breaking Europe, that said it all, that was good tv. However, him quitting the resulting Tory leadership contest because he really doesn't want to deal with the resulting mess, that's just too much of a caricature.

Speaking of caricatures: what's with the Michael Gove characterisation? He already was set up to defy belief with his stanning for World War I and blaming WWI's bad public image on Blackadder, while being minister for education, no less. Did we really need that "we don't need no stinking experts" appearance? That's just a lame imitation of the main villain in the overseas spin-off. Cut it down, please.

But where the show has really lost the plot is this: downer episodes of apocalyptic dimensions are all very well, but then we need someone to rally. Where's the subsequent episode where the Labour people use the golden opportunity to denounce the government party who is responsible for the unholy mess? Where's the part where one of them, preferably the head of the party, uses departing villain Cameron's first appearance in Parliament after the Brexitocalypse to eviscerate him and the party he represents verbally? Instead, you give us Labour busy eviscarating itself, all of them screaming at each other how vile they were, no one giving an airtime minute of criticism directed at the Tories. And when Cameron - CAMERON - tells the supposed head of the good guys that he needs to quit, there's not even the teensiest weensiest reminder on the part of our hero that if Cameron had quit ages ago and had devoted himself to the joys of necroporkophilia in private, the current mess might not be happening at all. Nor does anyone else point this is out. Too busy with the infighting. I suspect the scriptwriter of this episode to be a secret Tory itching to spread the incompetent leftists stereotype, except for the part where the conservatives are made to look just as incompetent, and craven to boot. (Again: Boris' disappearance act.)

In conclusion: fire those writers and producers. And the cast as well. This show needs a complete overhaul.
selenak: (Richelieu by Lost_Spook)
Worst researched article about scriptwriting (and novels) ever?

"It is Cromwell's goodness that corrodes him, his loyalty to Cardinal Newman that fixes him on the same tragic trajectory as both Macbeth and Michael Corleone."

First of all, John Yorke, this is not the Cardinal you're looking for. The Cardinal Thomas Cromwell used to work for is named Wolsey, Newman living a few centuries later and being the most prominent Anglo Catholic before becoming a Roman Catholic, which in the light of Thomas Cromwell's main claim to historical fame makes this sentence even more hilarious than it already is. Also, h ow you can read Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall and Bringing Up The Bodies and emerge with the conclusion that Cromwell's increasing loss of humanity is caused because of his loyalty to Wolsey is somewhere beyond me. (Unless, of course, you really think that Cromwell brings down Anne Boleyn & friends because they've been mean to the Cardinal, as opposed to treating the opportunity to pick men to frame as Anne's lovers as an occasion to pick those men who gloated over Wolsey as an added bonus, but hey, maybe Yorke read two different novels. Well read different books and watch different films & tv shows. (Something I was reminded again of this past week with my feelings re: the Being Human finale being the exact opposite of the reason I've seen a lot elsewhere, while what I loved about the most recent Once Upon A Time ep was not necessarily what some other reviewing watchers loved.) But the article really is badly researched, quite aside from the Newman/Wolsey gaffe. I mean:

We don't like Satan in Paradise Lost – we love him. And we love him because he's the perfect gleeful embodiment of evil. Niceness tends to kill characters.

Oh, good lord. Have you read Paradise Lost? Gleeful? This would be the fellow who spends most of the poem angsting about his enstrangement from God and railing against the injustice of Dad his creator, and going after the younger kids, speak: Adam and Eve because why should they be happy if he can't? (And I'll never go back, Dad, never mind you kicked me out, I'm so not coming back, dad, so there!) Seriously, though, if you want a gleeful devil, you can go for Goethe's Mephisto in Faust (though he, too, has the occasional two lines melancholic moment, but mostly he's witheringly sarcastic and enjoying himself), not for Satan from Paradise Lost. As for "niceness tends to kill characters", well, that depends. I love a shady anti hero(ine) or a good villain as much as the next media consumant (see my recent attack of love for the most evil villain to grace the Once Upon A Time screen on a semi regular basis), but I've long grown out of that teenage good = boring attitude. It depends on the situation you put your character in and on the types of relationships you give to him or her. Call the Midwife, which just wrapped up its second season, is full of nice, and I use the word unironically and not to mean the opposite which it often does in fandom, characters. An entire ensemble of them. And guess what? It's not boring.

In conclusion: grow up, John Yorke, do your research, and/or get a better editor. P.S. The quote in the title of this post is from The Vision of Judgment by Byron. That one has a good Satan in it, too, though not a gleeful one.

...

Feb. 25th, 2013 05:29 am
selenak: (Maria La Guerta by Goddess Naunett)
Did they just use the soundtrack for GONE WITH THE WIND to rush Quentin Tarantino off stage after his script win for Django Unchained?

...they did. They truly did.
selenak: (Scarlett by Olde_fashioned)
Another new season I look forward to, with some trepidation because the first one was so good and I can't know yet whether this will be the type of show who does one perfect season and then flounders or the type of show which builds on its initial success and becomes even better, is s2 of Homeland, and there is a trailer now. I'm morbidly amused that they use the same music as Downton Abbey, i.e. an a capella rendition of I'll be watching you, only Homeland is fully aware the song is supposed to be creepy, not romantic, and uses that to full effect. Also CARRRRIIIEEEE. I don't know who, it might have been abigail_n, when reviewing the show smartly said that while the audience starts empathizing with Brodie and disliking Carrie (whose flaws, and not "heroic" or cutesy flaws but genuinely appalling ones, are if anything highlighted in the pilot), and by the time the show ends, the reverse was true at least for her (and also for me) simply by a) the way we've been getting to know both characters and b) plot developments. Anyway, Damian Lewis is a fabulous actor, no question about, but Claire Danes' Carrie is my main character draw for the second season.

Speaking of Downton Abbey, I had a recent moment where a reviewer you want to agree with is so jerky about it that you instinctively side with the maligned party. Well, I did. This came in the (adoringly positive) review of Parade's End, starring Benedict Cumberbatch, which the reviewer starts by slamming not only Downton Abbey but also anyone who enjoys Downton Abbey: Any diehard Downton fans tuning in to BBC2 on Friday night, hoping for a fun, easy, schmaltzy, pretty, faintly rewarding hour or so, or so-so, of bodiced bitchery, and a bit of intrigue telegraphed only by railway hooters and wobbly cartoon finger-signs pointing to "the bad 'un", will have been royally disappointed. That's the first piece of excellent news about Parade's End.

Now, I wrote a very critical review of Downton Abbey's second second season recently. And if anyone said it's entertaining schlock with class snobbery a mile wide, I'd agree immediately. But reading this particular review (which could have been written without any DA reference at all, since it's about a miniseries based on four legendary novels which have nothing to with with Downton Abbey whatsoever) made me suddenly look forward to yet another season of "bodiced bitchery" while not in a hurry to look for Parade's End because if there's one thing I absolutely can't stand, it's this type of condescension. You know, Euan Ferguson, it's entirely possible to enjoy both "fun, easy schmaltz" and layered tv both. You're not thrown out of the club of the literati because of that.

Then again, maybe Ferguson felt the need for a Downton Abbey slam because Parade's End's star, Benedict Cumberbatch, recently managed the rare feat to diss the show and to behave as Matthew Crawley and the Earl his future father-in-law personified, moaning about the burden of his privilege and threatening to go America where the posh aren't bashed. This resulted in various utterings by other people, the most funny of which was this article (tweeted by Dan Stevens, who plays Matthew, without comment). "Fetch the caviar, it's Rinkydink Curdlesnoot, the great ponce" is what will come to (my) mind when seeing the quondam Sherlock from now on, because it's the best quote ever. This being said, Bimpleswitch Wafflechops (tm article) is a good actor, Tom Stoppard is a great writer, and so was Ford Maddox Ford on whose novels the miniseries is based, so I'll look forward to seeing it regardless. But I'd look forward to it even more if Euan Ferguson hadn't praised it first.

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 05:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios