Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (Galadriel by Kathyh)
My Tolkien creds are very flimsy indeed - I read LotR as a teenager, tried the Silmarillion, could not get through it, reread the books as an adult, and that's it. The last rereading of LotR (plus appendices) was, I think, when Fellowship of the Ring, the movie, got released. Meaning: I really have only very vague memories, and thus am unable to make textual comparisons when watching the first two episodes of the "The Rings of Power" series which just got released on Amazon Prime. Though I did osmose some additional facts via fandom, such as, two decades ago, Peter Jackson being unable to reference anything NOT in the appendices but in the Silmarillion by name because Tolkien never sold the movie rights for the Sil and Christopher Tolkien's lawyers would have come after him. Either the Tolkien estate loosened up because Christopher Tolkien is dead or the Amazon Prime guys are more confident, because the word "Silmaril" was spoken and the item(s) discussed by Elrond and another character in one scene, talking about the past.

Now, on to the two episodes forming the show's debut.

Once upon a time in the Second Age... )

So, all in all: I like it. It's Tolkien fanfiction with heart in it, based on the first two eps. May it continue to remain so.
selenak: (Galadriel by Kathyh)
None of these are new, but they may be new to you as they were to me, fellow readers.

There are notoriously few female characters in Tolkien, and even fewer allowed some dialogue and personality, but thankfully, this has not stopped fandom to work with what is there and flesh out the ladies in question. Take Bilbo’s mother Belladonna Took, of whom we solely know that she had adventures, knew Gandalf, and that that Bilbo’s father Bungo built Bag End with her money. Two stories providing wonderful versions of Belladonna:

Light words about nothing, and other pleasures : in which she encounters Thorin’s sister Dis (remember, dwarves have a far longer life span than Hobbits, who in turn live longer than humans); Dis herself, whose pov the story takes, is also a Tolkien female of whom we only know the name and whose relation she was, and who took on a life of her own in fanfiction. More often than not, she’s stuck with the role of shipping cheerleader, but not so here.

Back, and there again: Tolkien was clear on what kind of afterlife was available for elves and dwarves, but not so much for Hobbits. This means some creative liberty for fandom, and not least due to Sansukh, afterlife reunions have become an entire subgenre. In this version, Belladonna and Bungo have been waiting for Bilbo to join them after his long life is finally over. But one hobbit’s paradise is not another’s, and so Belladonna goes on one more adventure, together with and for her son.

The Crone of Bagshot Row: no Belladonna in this one, but an old friend of hers, who has been keeping an eye on her son from afar.

But of course the most famous female Hobbit in Tolkien’s world is also the one with the worst press: Lobelia Sackville-Baggins. Lobelia is usually used as comic relief (fair enough, that’s how Tolkien uses her, with one remarkable exception), if she isn’t used as in an uncanonical mean stepmother role for Frodo so he can be rescued. (As ridiculous as that is, it pales next to the AUs where Lobelia gets to be Bilbo‘s mean aunt. I mean, AU or no AU, she’s younger than Bilbo in canon, and my own preferences for AUs is that they should keep the generational outlines of the original.) [personal profile] legionseagle wrote a witty and spirited defense of Lobelia, which I urge you to read, so I shan’t repeat to her but will quote the moment of glory Tolkien gives her, during the Scouring of the Shire, as recounted to Frodo: it’s Lobelia Sackville-Baggins versus Saruman (via his henchman): ‘ “I’ll give you Sharkey, you dirty thieving ruffians!” says she, and ups with her umberella and goes for the leader, near twice her size. So they took her. Dragged her off to the Lockholes, at her age too. They’ve took others we miss more, but there’s no denying she showed more spirit than most’.

Bearing this in mind, I can entirely believe the following AUs take on what would have happened if Lobelia in her penchant for acquiring shiney objects of metal not hers (shared, as [personal profile] legionseagle mentioned, by Cousin Bilbo) would have gotten hold of the One Ring:


The curious case of Lobelia Sackville-Baggins and her magic ring

And lastly, not a female-centric tale but one of the funniest I’ve ever read (with one angsty interlude), using the movieverse circumstance of Thorin addressing Bilbo as a“Mr. Baggins“, „Master Baggins“ or „Master Burglar“ up to and until he’s entered the Lonely Mountain, at which point he switches to „Bilbo“ to spin a hilarious yet entirely in character explanation (Thorin didn’t catch Bilbo’s first name before Bilbo had won his respect near the end of the first movie and afterwards was too embarassed to ask directly) into this glorious epic:

The Naming of Hobbits

In haste

Mar. 1st, 2016 06:38 am
selenak: (Eva Green)
Before I catch the train which I'll be on for the rest of the day, a few links:

Penny Dreadful: Titan Books will do a comics prequel, which on the one hand, yay, on the other, will the medium be able to catch the glorious screwed upness of the Vanessa and Malcolm relationship, which, let's be real, is what I most want from a prequel?

Black Sails: unrelated to yesterday's issue, concise post on another issue, to wit, why my sympathies are entirely with Max (and Eleanor), not Jack, in last episode's development, here.

Tolkien: great essay in the TLS by [personal profile] rozk, here.

Oscars: one of the weirdest moments was when a bunch of people, led by Alejandro Iñárritu, refused to applaud for costume designer Jenny Beavan. Satiric take on that one.

Links

Feb. 17th, 2016 06:17 am
selenak: (Black Sails by Violateraindrop)
Off to a train, thus in haste a few links:

Black Sails:


Queer and diverse, Black Sails is qietly TV's most revolutionary show: I'll say.

Marvel:

After the day's work is done Nick Fury character study in vid form, reminding me that morally ambiguous middle aged spies are my catnip and that canon Fury is way more interesting than the irate boss version of him usually found in fanfiction.

Tolkien:

How many miles did Frodo and Sam have to walk to get to Mordor?: not as many as today's refugees do, but pretty close (Serbia to London, or Texas to Los Angeles in US terms).
selenak: (JohnPaul by Jennymacca)
So here I am, sitting in a train, idly reading the "Literary Review" from November, when lo and behold, I come across an article opening with the following lines:

"If Tolkien and C.S. Lewis were the Lennon and McCartney of the Inklings, then Charles Williams was the George Harrison. (And their Ringo? Possibly Owen Barfield. Another story.)"

My both Beatles and Inklings interested mind, it boggled. Also, considering their lifetimes overlapped, I wonder what Tolkien & Lewis would have made of the comparison. Anyway, the article writer, one Kevin Jackson, makes a good case for Charles Williams as George, not just because of the fame factor("Williams's considerable, highly ideosyncratic achievement have long since been overshadowed by those of his two world famous Oxford pals, and no doubt always will be", but also because of the minus and plus sides of Williams' character (on the minus side: neglectful husband, obsession with pretty muse figures, given to jealous; on the plus side, inspiring, sometimes even life changing teacher, ardent scholar, one of the great all round autodidacts, and no less a person than W.H. Auden raved about Williams "personal sanctity"; on the neutral side, he was famously a practicing occultist). But where I'm currently stuck is: between Tolkien and Lewis, who gets to be who? Jackson by the order of names seems to be casting Tolkien as John, but Tollers strikes me as not nearly aggressive and quarrelsome for that, not to mention that he loved to work and had endless patience, both very un-Lennonian traits. But on the other hand Lewis also was a workoholic, and certainly once the Narnia novels took off in rapid succession while Tolkien painstakingly labored and was annoyed by both Lewis' shoddy worldbuilding and commercial appeal, you can see some McCartney parallels there. Then again, Joy Gresham works better as Yoko than Edith Tolkien does.

Nah, I can't decide. Anyway, Jackson was probably just thinking of their standing in the group vis a vis that of Williams, I know, but it's still fun to wonder. If they'd been born two generations later and in very different social circumstances, how would Tolkien and Lewis have fared in a rock group?
selenak: (Galadriel by Kathyh)
This is why German book fairs are the best. I mean, clearly. Where else can you see Thranduil in his comfy slippers on the lookout for the latest bestsellers in Sindarin and Quenya?

 photo image.jpg3_zpslcms5vlz.jpg
selenak: (Eva Green)
Casting news (in one case older news for most people, I'm sure) that made me realise my priorities and double standards:

a) Bradley James is in the fourth season of Homeland. Sorry, Bradley James, I loved your Arthur Pendragon in Merlin, but there were a lot of reasons why I quit watching Homeland in early s3, among them loss of quality and questionable ideology, and I'm not going back.

b) Lucy Lawless is the the second season of Agents of SHIELD. Now this is a show I haven't watched so far; my flist/circle had about two third naysays, one third (all the more enthusiastic) yaysayers about it, there were so many other interesting shows to watch, and also I'm so fond of the MCU I didn't want to risk dampening the emotion by disgruntlement should I dislike AoS. However, Lucy Lawless in the Marvelverse? Must have! (Unless she's only in one episode, I should acertain that first.) (If you recognize where the quote titling this post comes from, you might feel similarly.)

Meanwhile, further news both on the Lewis & Tolkien and the solo Tolkien biopics in planning demonstrate someone's (be the publicity people, the reporters, or, heaven forfend, the scriptwriters) lack of actual knowledge re: Tolkien and Lewis, as is entertainingly pointed out here.

Penny Dreadful:

We have a Penny Dreadful vid! And a good one, covering the ensemble and the relationships between same - with one unfortunate exception. Which, sadly for me though not for the vidder and the vid, happens to be the relationship I'm most interested in. There is a complete lack of Malcolm in the vid (and hence also no Vanessa and Malcolm). Which reminds me that last week when someone at last posted Penny Dreadful icons, I was delighted...until I saw there were no Malcolm and no Vanessa and Malcolm icons. Alas. Anyway, back to the original point, which was: a shiny vid about a lovely twisted Victorian Gothic show:


A Shot for the Pain (11 words) by Franzeska
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: Penny Dreadful (TV)
Rating: Not Rated
Warnings: Author Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings
Additional Tags: Fanvids, ConStrict 2014


X-Men: Days of Future Past:

Missing scene type of fanfic covering how old Erik and old Charles reunited, which is just what I need when the angst elsewhere gets too much:

Rescue Me (2492 words) by Unforgotten
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)
Rating: Teen And Up Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Erik Lehnsherr/Charles Xavier
Characters: Erik Lehnsherr, Charles Xavier
Additional Tags: Pre-Movie(s), jailbreak, Reunions
Summary:

Against all hope, Charles and Erik reunite at the beginning of the Sentinel War.




And lastly, not completely unrelated to the beginning of this post, something only funny if a) you know German, b) have a vague idea about what the Bavarian dialect sounds like, and c) are familiar with a certain 1990s fantasy show made in New Zealand: Xena auf Bayrisch.
selenak: (Galadriel by Kathyh)
The announcement of a movie about the friendship between J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis reminded me again how inconvenient real life often operates when it comes to dramatizing, especially regarding giving a story climax and resolution. The last time C.S. Lewis was the subject of a biographical movie, Shadowlands, it was focused on a relationship of his as well, true, but the death of the other main character, his wife Joy, and Lewis struggling through the immediate aftermath provided a natural third act and resolution, so to speak. Even so, the script simplified and exised people a great deal (Joy went from having two sons from her first marriage to having only one, Lewis' friends - Tolkien, Williams et al. - were all represented, sort of, as one fictional character named Christopher, and absolutely no mention was made of Lewis' pre-Joy decades long relationship with a woman, "Mintho" Moore. (As I understand it the nature of the relationship - filial, romantic or a mixture of the two - is still under debate, but what's not under debate is that he lived with her for decades and she hadn't been dead that long when he met Joy.) Mentioning this isn't meant as a put-down on my part, by the way. All this exising of characters allows for a tighter focus, I found the film very moving and superbly acted by Anthony Hopkins and Debra Winger (one reason why I was so dissappointed when the film's scriptwriter recently was such an ass about his Mandela biopic flopping), and at any rate, Shadowlands isn't supposed to be about Lewis' entire life and never claimed to cover all the aspects.

Now, with Tolkien and Lewis, I wonder what kind of structure they'll go for. Act I: Our Heroes meet and hit it off between love for all things Norse and Tolkien converting Lewis to Christianity, leading to Inklings, Hobbit, Screwtape, Tolkien starting LotR, Lewis starting Narnia. Act II: Lewis dashes off Narnia books at top speed, happily mixing fauns and Father Christmas, and becomes a Christian Explainer To The Masses, both of which irritates Tolkien a lot for various reasons. However, "Fellowship" getting published and Lewis writing glowing reviews while suggesting Tolkien for the Nobel Prize papers over the cracks for a while, until the arrival of either Charles Williams or Joy Gresham or both (depending on whether the script wants to use both) in Lewis' life and Lewis insisting on Tolkien befriending them when he, Lewis, had previously refused to have anything to do with Edith Tolkien leads to serious enstrangement. Act II climaxes with a big argument. Act III: well, there's the problem. As far as I know, and I could be misremembering or not knowing in the first place, Tolkien and Lewis drifting apart wasn't, in fact, a dramatic series of arguments but more a slow and entirely undramatic series of contact lessening and terse remarks in letters to other people. It's not like either of them ever wrote a How Do You Sleep? about each other or attacked each other via the press. Why so restrained and dignified, English professors? I bet the script will go entirely fictional at that point, inventing both a dramatic face to face argument and (after some scenes of pining) an equally dramatic reconciliation (maybe after Joy's death), and it fades out with them sitting on a bench a la Bilbo and Gandalf early in the film version of Fellowship, two battered old friends together.

So far, so semi-serious speculation on my part. Now for some completely irreverent flippancy: fandom being what it is, if this movie will cast actors as Tolkien and Lewis who are in any way regarded as hot, there will be slash. Depending on how successful the movie is, it could be solely a tiny corner at Yuletide or the next Big Thing. If the later, I predict Joy and/or Edith bashing of the She Comes Between Them type as well. If Charles Williams exists in the movie, He Comes Between Them As Well, but that traditionally doesn't lead to bashing in a male character, it leads to rival ships. Williams could have a postmortem career as the next Castiel there, with Lewis/Williams the alternative to the big Lewis/Tolkien juggernaut, and a small but vocal minority writing Tolkien/Williams hate sex. Poor Mrs. Moore probably won't exist in this one at all, either, and definitely won't get played by Helen Mirren which as I seem to recall was A. N. Wilson's suggestion, but if I'm wrong and Mintho Moore makes it into the Tolkien/Lewis saga, and if there is even the smallest hint she's something other than a mother figure to Lewis, then she'll probably join Edith and Joy in the ranks of bashed female characters, and stories set in the early stages of the Tolkien and Lewis relationship will cast her as the villain trying to prevent it. Oh, if someone unearths Lewis' "Four Loves", to be specific, the essay praising (male) friendship and comparising favourably with male/female romance, then tumblr will go wild using photos from the movie with quotes.

...or the movie could sink without a trace in either fandom or critical attention. Or never get made. But where'd be the fun in that?

Links!

Dec. 23rd, 2013 12:07 pm
selenak: (City - KathyH)
No topics for the busiest of holidays and the day before that, thank God, which allows me to read what everyone else has written, and thus you get links today. :)

Poetic meta on Jackie Tyler, the Ninth Doctor and Rose as Demeter, Hades and Persephone.

The Inner Light as a TNG highlight. TNG and Picard love are always lovely to read.

It's been literally decades since I've read the Silmarillion, but I still found this hysterical and want [personal profile] penknife to write the Southern Gothic versions of Lord of the Rings as well:

Leaving Bliss, aka Galadriel's backstory from the Silmarillion, the Southern way. :)

But if you want to know the beginning of it, you have to go back to my grandparents. Grandpa Finny (and if you're confusing him already with Uncle Fenny and his brothers Fin and Little Finny, you aren't from Bliss yourself) was always keen on having sons.
selenak: (Servalan by Snowgrouse)
Before I go to do my daily conferencing (not the fun kind today, but the necessary kind), we have another trailer, this one of the special about the birth of Doctor Who, so to speak:

An Adventure in Time and Space

In which Jenny from Call The Midwife is Verity Lambert, first DW producer ever, and David Bradley gets his William Hartnell on. It looks like they're the two main characters of the story, which makes me suspect Mark Gattiss, who wrote the script, is going for something of a A Star is Born structure, only without romance, i.e. male character's professional career peaks, then declines while female character's rises. As long as Gattiss doesn't do what The Artist did (and that's one of several reasons why I couldn't join in the Artist squee a few years back), i.e.make the female character feel guilty about her success and has everyone throw a pity party for the male character, I'm good with that. And going by the trailer, he doesn't.

Also: Verity Lambert pitching the Doctor as "C.S. Lewis meets H.G. Wells meets Father Christmas" evoked a double reaction from me: on the one hand, given that's not how he comes across in An Unearthly Child where the heroes are Barbara and Ian, I can't imagine this pitch having happened, otoh, I have to admit I don't care because the description cracks me up, and I now shall ascribe all the Doctor's interpersonal relationship troubles to the fact he was modelled after C. S. Lewis and H.G. Wells.

(Yes, yes, in all likelihood Film!Verity is referring to Lewis and Wells as writers, with the TARDIS doubling as wardrobe that leads into Narnia, but that's not as much fun as wondering whether, if the Doctor is C.S. Lewis, that makes either Warnie Lewis or J.R.R. Tolkien the Master.) (Joy Gresham is clearly Romana.)
selenak: (Raven and Charles by Scribble My Name)
It's a busy week - in a good way - for me, hence no posting until now. However, I do get online and enjoy reading great posts like this: 

Neil Gaiman about growing up with C.S.Lewis, J.R.R.   Tolkien and C.G. Chesterton

I love it when writers manage go convey such a detailed sense of what reading and experiencing other books feels like.  And the way Gaiman captures the what the (in themselves very different) styles and worlds of Lewis, Tolkien and Chesterton evoke is magnificent.

I also enjoy a good dissing now and them,  and in  this post, which actually is a praise of C.S. Forresters non-Hornblower novels, [personal profile] legionseagle sums up the ever popular Regency/Napoleonic Wars era novels and tv shows thusly:

Given that the Napoleonic wars is Not My Period, but is the subject of an awful lot of popular literature and TV I've consumed over the years, I've formed the view that notwithstanding Napoleon's command of the Continent's resources, tactical genius and overwhelming superiority in numbers, the poor little Corsican bugger never stood a chance, trapped as he was between Hornblower's crushing man-pain at sea and the chips on Sharpe's shoulders on land.

Ah yes.:) See, that's one more reason why I'm eager for Jo Graham's trilogy set in the Napoleonic era to be published. They center around a woman, Elza aka Ida St. Elme, are from the French pov and will reveal how Dutch-turned-French female common sense and bisexual confidence  were more than a match for Hornblower's man pain AND Sharpe's chip on the shoulder...
selenak: (Orson Welles by Moonxpoints5)
Five questions you would like to ask authors or creators of source material in your fandom(s).

1.) So, Will, what is up with the Third Murderer, and does Lady M. have children or doesn't she?

2.) Dear Professor Tolkien, while I deeply appreciate the splendour of your imagination and linguistic skills, did it ever occur to you that to create entire species described as evil and utterly incapable to be reasoned with or redeemed, only fit to be killed, was to express the spirit of the age in a, euphemistically put, highly questionable manner? But go you for making female dwarves having beards as well; Terry Prattchet did wonders with that. Yours sincerely, A Reader.

3.) Orson, do tell me you've made a copy of The Other Side of the Wind that's not locked up in some moneylender's safe and slowly but surely decaying beyond the restoration possibility. You knew what happened to your other films, and so you must have made a copy. WHERE IS IT? Also: any chances you'll film that Yuletide story of Falstaff as a space pirate from the Hereafter BECAUSE YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO?

4.) Dear Miss Austen: why the infatuation with that stupid goose Mary, Queen of Scots and the Elizabeth Tudor bashing?

5.) Dear Paul, will you record and release that song you co-wrote with Keith Richards in 2005? I am dying with curiosity as to what a McCartney/Richards song sounds like, plus the mere fact of its existence is bound to infuriate certain rock critics. Yours tactlessly, a fan aware that nobody is getting any younger, including herself.
selenak: (Shadows - Saava)
Five favorite tv series that started with bad pilot episodes.

Glad you asked! Though I shall stretch the definition of "bad" to "did nothing for me" in some cases, though they are hardly the same thing. Other cases are just plain bad, of course. :)

1.) Star Trek: The Next Generation. To be fair, the entire first season, the rare episode excepted, wasn't All That, but I still remember going back to the pilot after the show had finished, for the first time, all aglow in fannish love and misrembering stuff and then I rewatched and... err. CRINGE. SUPERCRINGE. Especially knowing the actors and later scriptwriters were capable of so much more. Which is why, when I want to pimp TNG, I NEVER go for the pilot.

2.) Babylon 5. By which I mean The Gathering, not the first episode of season 1. The Gathering has some good points - I still like the scene with Garibaldi and Londo in which Londo makes his "tawdry tourist attraction" remark, for example - but all in all, again, very much a good idea still in development and not one you'd use to advertise the show.

3.) Fringe. It has the downsides - the gore, the bad science - and not yet many of the virtues of the show. Olivia's trauma is standard noir and you could see it coming a mile away, and while I appreciate that her initial clashes with Broyles show her strength of character, introducing Broyles as someone who thinks sexual molestation isn't a big deal was a really bad idea. (Also weirdly incongruent with later characterisation.) Had I not known better things were to come, I might not have stuck with the show (and would have regretted it very much.)

4.) Doctor Who. To be fair, applying the concept of pilot episodes to something produced at the start of the 60s with a very different format is unfair, but I still wouldn't use An Unearthly Child to draw anyone in, or even to introduce the First Doctor, Barbara, Ian and Susan, especially if they're not familiar with 60s tv yet. (My showcase for the original Team TARDIS is The Aztecs. Which I defy anyone to watch and not love.) It's an eternity until something happens other than Barbara and Ian talking about how weird Susan is, One's characterisation is still very wobbly (caveman incident, what the hell?), and Barbara isn't yet her awesome later self, either. Now I didn't see this until I had seen a great deal of Seven, some Four, some Six, some Three and the first two seasons of New Who, so it wasn't a question of getting hooked or not, but if it had been my introduction to Whodom, I suspect it might have been a short-lived one.

5.) Highlander: The Series. It has good stuff - not least because that's the one and only time we see Connor on the show, and it's important to establish a connection between the original film and the series, plus it does a good job of introducing Tessa and Ritchie - but the reason why it nearly turned me off from watching was that Duncan himself, and the actual plot of the pilot, seemed terribly derivative. So there is this Highlander whose backstory sounds just like the other Highlander's, and the evil villain now donning a punk exterior in pursuit, who does his best to sound like the film's villain, too. Now I had liked the original film well enough - that was why I had tuned in - but a pale copy wasn't what I wanted to see. In due course, the show would establish its own rich universe, full of interesting characters (female and male) and with a focus on moral dilemmas that hadn't been there in the filmverse, plus Duncan would become very much his own character, but again - for pimping HL, I would never use the pilot.

****

I await pilot defenders for all five with bated breath. In other news:

a.) Stumbled across a rumour Brad Pitt wants to play John Lennon in a biopic; was suitably aghast. I mean, nothing against Brad, but my brain breaks when I attempt to imagine (ha!) him as John. Sidenote: not that previous screen Johns looked all that much like the late J.L., not least because actors tend to have a far more buff figure than musicians who were frighteningly thin at times to compensate for what they called their "fat Elvis" period, though yours truly would call it the period when he actually had some flesh on his bones. But still - Brad Pitt?

b.) A Dynasty prequel? Dynasty was a guilty vice of mine during the 80s. (It didn't dawn to me until later how outrageous the whole plotline with Blake killing his son's ex boyfriend was, since we were supposed to feel sorry for Blake there.) Back when I fell for Heroes it took me a while to make the connection and realise Noah Bennett was none other than Steven Carrington (second version), which was fairly mindboggling.

c) [personal profile] onyxlynx pointed me towards "The Rest is Noise", where I found a great essay about the two Rings - Wagner's and Tolkien's, that is. Very much reccommended if you're fond of either or both, and even if you're not.

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 02:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios