Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (Thorin by Meathiel)
Since I need fannish joy in my life and since apparently February is the month for ship posts: my recent return to Middle Earth has also reassured me regarding my inner slasher. More recently, there has been many a ship, both m/m and f/f, which I either couldn’t see or which didn’t appeal to me. But say what you want about the Tolkien & Jackson cinematic combination, they bring on the homoeroticism. (Also unexpected het couples, see Gandalf/Galadriel. Plus I’m fascinated by Tauriel & Thranduil both as an ampersand and a /, the later if it’s a slow burn.) When I was a young reader, I loved various of the friendships and was fine with, say, Eowyn/Faramir (yes, it happened fast, but he was Worthy), but it wouldn’t have occured to me to ship in the sense of seeking out fanfic, or wanting the characters to have more romance in between the platonic handholding. Fast forward a few decades, and not only did Sean Bean as Boromir plus the Philippa Boyens/Fran Walsh scriptwriting suddenly make me love a character whom I had been indifferent to, but I suddenly shipped him in every sense of the word with Aragon. (Whom I also felt much stronger about on screen than I had on the page.) The hobbits I loved in either incarnation, though I thought that maybe they were too, hm, cute for jaded old me to ship them?

The Hobbit movies a decade later proved me wrong in this regard. (And I’m even older now!) I fell for Thorin/Bilbo, hard, and, going by my Middle Earthian expeditions in recent weeks, am staying smitten. This, mind you, is a movieverse only thing, since both Thorin in general and the relationship Bilbo has with him have been significantly altered from the novel.

Again, part of it is certainly the actor: as with Sean Bean, so with Richard Armitage. But it’s also the writing. Overall, if a relationship appeals to me so strongly I need to see both parties getting something from it that is unique in their lives. Doesn’t mean they don’t care for other people and/or causes, strongly, too, but for me to root for a pairing, they more often than not need to challenge each other in a particular way.


Cut for length of ramblings about a hobbit and a dwarf )
selenak: (Galadriel by Kathyh)
None of these are new, but they may be new to you as they were to me, fellow readers.

There are notoriously few female characters in Tolkien, and even fewer allowed some dialogue and personality, but thankfully, this has not stopped fandom to work with what is there and flesh out the ladies in question. Take Bilbo’s mother Belladonna Took, of whom we solely know that she had adventures, knew Gandalf, and that that Bilbo’s father Bungo built Bag End with her money. Two stories providing wonderful versions of Belladonna:

Light words about nothing, and other pleasures : in which she encounters Thorin’s sister Dis (remember, dwarves have a far longer life span than Hobbits, who in turn live longer than humans); Dis herself, whose pov the story takes, is also a Tolkien female of whom we only know the name and whose relation she was, and who took on a life of her own in fanfiction. More often than not, she’s stuck with the role of shipping cheerleader, but not so here.

Back, and there again: Tolkien was clear on what kind of afterlife was available for elves and dwarves, but not so much for Hobbits. This means some creative liberty for fandom, and not least due to Sansukh, afterlife reunions have become an entire subgenre. In this version, Belladonna and Bungo have been waiting for Bilbo to join them after his long life is finally over. But one hobbit’s paradise is not another’s, and so Belladonna goes on one more adventure, together with and for her son.

The Crone of Bagshot Row: no Belladonna in this one, but an old friend of hers, who has been keeping an eye on her son from afar.

But of course the most famous female Hobbit in Tolkien’s world is also the one with the worst press: Lobelia Sackville-Baggins. Lobelia is usually used as comic relief (fair enough, that’s how Tolkien uses her, with one remarkable exception), if she isn’t used as in an uncanonical mean stepmother role for Frodo so he can be rescued. (As ridiculous as that is, it pales next to the AUs where Lobelia gets to be Bilbo‘s mean aunt. I mean, AU or no AU, she’s younger than Bilbo in canon, and my own preferences for AUs is that they should keep the generational outlines of the original.) [personal profile] legionseagle wrote a witty and spirited defense of Lobelia, which I urge you to read, so I shan’t repeat to her but will quote the moment of glory Tolkien gives her, during the Scouring of the Shire, as recounted to Frodo: it’s Lobelia Sackville-Baggins versus Saruman (via his henchman): ‘ “I’ll give you Sharkey, you dirty thieving ruffians!” says she, and ups with her umberella and goes for the leader, near twice her size. So they took her. Dragged her off to the Lockholes, at her age too. They’ve took others we miss more, but there’s no denying she showed more spirit than most’.

Bearing this in mind, I can entirely believe the following AUs take on what would have happened if Lobelia in her penchant for acquiring shiney objects of metal not hers (shared, as [personal profile] legionseagle mentioned, by Cousin Bilbo) would have gotten hold of the One Ring:


The curious case of Lobelia Sackville-Baggins and her magic ring

And lastly, not a female-centric tale but one of the funniest I’ve ever read (with one angsty interlude), using the movieverse circumstance of Thorin addressing Bilbo as a“Mr. Baggins“, „Master Baggins“ or „Master Burglar“ up to and until he’s entered the Lonely Mountain, at which point he switches to „Bilbo“ to spin a hilarious yet entirely in character explanation (Thorin didn’t catch Bilbo’s first name before Bilbo had won his respect near the end of the first movie and afterwards was too embarassed to ask directly) into this glorious epic:

The Naming of Hobbits

More recs

Jan. 16th, 2019 11:13 am
selenak: (Bilbo Baggins)
Still in a mood for Middle Earth, not least because the craziest twist in either book or movie verse makes more sense than British politics right now. (Yep, it’s still that painful „watching a friend commit a long, drawn out suicide by drinking themselves to death“ feeling.)

So, on to fiction, where people behave in less lethally farcical ways. You know, just a trivial matter but I couldn’t help but notice: in fanfiction, Kili and Fili address Thorin with „Uncle“ all the time and refer to him as „Uncle Thorin“, ditto with Frodo and „Uncle“, „Uncle Bilbo“ etc. Whereas in canon: the movies have use Frodo „Uncle“ as an address precisely once (in the „Unexpected Journey“ opening flashfoward) , versus „Bilbo“ at all other occasions (Fellowship and Return of the King), and he never refers to him as „Uncle Bilbo“. (Nor does anyone else. Sam says „Mr. Bilbo“, Merry and Pippin mention him as „Bilbo“ or „the old Hobbit“.) In the books, it’s „Bilbo“ all the way. As for Kili and Fili, as far as I recall in the book their biological relation to Thorin is only mentioned in the paragraph that brings up their deaths; in the movies, Fili uses „Uncle“ once – when pleading that Kili should not be left behind in Laketown – but it’s „Thorin“ otherwise from both brothers. (Fili calls „Thorin“ before the wounded Thorin regains consciousness near the end of „An Unexpected Journey“, Kili addresses him as „Thorin“ in his „what the hell, hero!“ speech in „Battle of the Five Armies“.

Now, at a guess, the reason for Frodo’s fanon constant „Uncle“ use is that Frodo, no matter at which point the story is set, tends to be written as younger than he is anyway, and definitely in pre-quest stories. (If you’re the woobie, you get infantilized.) As for Kili and Fili – maybe there’s a subconscious assumption that calling their uncle by his name is too informal for a hierarchical society? Too modern? Whereas yours truly sees the constant „Uncle“-ing as the modern touch.

Now, some recs:

I measured out my life in tea spoons: lovely Bilbo character portrait from childhood to Valinor, using tea as the Macguffin

The well-travelled soul: and another excellent character portrait of Bilbo through the ages via short vignettes

Sunshine and Rain : this one has Elrond and Bilbo talk about Arwen and mortality; it’s a hurt/comfort & friendship story with Bilbo doing the comforting

Splintes and Bruises: more but less serious h/c, this one set after the first movie, when both Thorin and Bilbo have to be covered in bruises due to the state Unexpected Journey left them in.

Five Times Lindir Was Stressed By Dwarves and One Time He Smiled: to finish my recs on a light note, poor Lindir. (Elrond’s steward at Rivendell, previously known as Figwit in fandom. *g*) Also a good look at Bilbo in this early stage of the quest.
selenak: (Bilbo Baggins)
Still in a mood to be sentimental about Middle Earth, I came across this neat take on Bilbo’s and Frodo’s first „real“ (i.e. not among masses of relations) encounter:
By the Brandywine

Noteworthy for a) keeping Tolkien’s take for how old Frodo was when Bilbo got interested in him and decided to adopt him, and b) letting Frodo show a sense of humor and spirit. Seriously, if you look for Bilbo & Frodo stories, you have to wade through Dickens pastiches where Frodo is a waif barely able to talk and prone to bursting into tears all the time, complete with the writers ignoring he was quite happily raised chez Brandybuck after his parents‘ death before Bilbo adopted him, not with the Sackville-Baggineses. This, incidentally, is not something you can blame the movies for, much as Peter Jackson makes the most of the angst potential of Elijah Wood’s blue eyes once the quest has started. Frodo when he’s introduced is very much a cheerful Hobbit, whose reaction to Bilbo trying to express his fondness is to say „Bilbo, have you been at the Gaffer’s home brew?“, and who parties with the best of them at the birthday gathering. (Which of course makes the later Ring and quest-caused changes all the more effective.)

Speaking of the birthday party, Bilbo’s farewell speech with the glorious trolling in the non-Middle Earth sense („I don’t know half of you half as well as I would like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve“) basically sums up his relationship with the Shire post-quest: both fondness and exasparation. In a way, both The Hobbit and LotR make the point that you can’t go home again, not to the home you remember, because either you or it or both have changed. It’s true for Thorin, for Bilbo, for Frodo. Incidentally, rewatching the birthday sequence has reminded me again what a superb job Ian Holm did, who with little screen time for Bilbo gets across a lot about the character, his relationships with Frodo and Gandalf, the effect the Ring has had on him, the crankiness mixed with the whimsy, the undiminished capacity for wonder and that old longing which gets him on the road again as it did decades earlier, against all Hobbit traditions. The Doylist reason why Bilbo leaves the tale early on and then has only cameos is obvious, once Tolkien had decided that he couldn’t be the ringbearer in this new tale, but on a Watsonian level, I think Bilbo deciding not to end his days in the Shire (where he lives in comfort and with a companion he’s fond of) after all but to hit the road again (until old age catches up with him once the life prolonging effect of the Ring is gone, and makes him retire in Rivendell) is a remarkable statement about just how powerful that inner restlessness must have been. And at the very end, in the Grey Havens, when he’s on the boat to the West, the very last thing he says is an expression of joy that there is at yet another adventure to go to. Here’s the birthday sequence for you all to enjoy and be sentimental about with me:



And the extended edition version, which has the Bilbo-Frodo moment I mentioned earlier:


selenak: (Bilbo Baggins)
In a hole in a ground, there lived a hobbit.

Bag End photo SAM_2534_zpsvs8vigbb.jpg

Et in Hobbiton Ego )
selenak: (Sternennacht - Lefaym)
Like apparantly everyone else, I was delighted by ten minutes glimpse at Hobbit filming, and hit by a wave of nostalgia for Middle Earth, New Zealand edition. (Also, I've seen Peter Jackson in slim form before but it still feels weird in this context, because on the LotR extras he's, err, anything but.) Also, despite the three Sherlock episodes Martin Freeman still at first glance looks like John Simm to me. Andy Serkis is love. Otherwise you can play a spot-the-Richard-Armitage-and-Aidan-Turner, and since no one is shown in costume yet, you can spot them sans dwarf get-up.

Speaking of Andy Serkis, I wonder: given The Hobbit will have its own version of the Bilbo-meets-Gollum encounter, will at some point someone insert that one in Fellowship in the brief flashback so that made-to-look-young Ian Holm goes the way of Sebastian Shaw in Return of the Jedi? And what about the inevitable Bilbo-cheated-first debate among the fanboys?

Star Wars jokes aside, it really was quite an emotional experience to see those Bag End and Rivendell sets again. I'm in the happy position of being fond of both novels and films without being fanatic about either, so while there was the occasional point where I thought, hm, PJ, don't think that was the right choice, that, during the trilogy there was much more which I loved. (And some of the stuff I had issues with was actually Tolkien, not Jackson.) And I bet Jackson will do wonders for the New Zealand tourist industry again, which given recent disasters this year hopefully benefits the general income.

(I wonder, do I still have my LotR icons somewhere?)

Meanwhile, the mood for poetry hasn't left. You know, there are some poems you think you know and then you find out people have only been quoting parts to you and that the entire poem puts those parts in a completely different context. Which is the case for W.H. Auden's The More Loving One with me. I only heard the first two verses, which read like a poignant evocation of unrequited love and acceptance of being the one who feels more. But the last two verses - which I hadn't known until yesterday - really make the poem, because they're quite the opposite of pining, and the wry humour and sensible pragmatism in them make this more similar to one of those 70s divorce songs talked about recently in this very journal than anything else.

The more loving one

Looking up at the stars, I know quite well
That, for all they care, I can go to hell,
But on earth indifference is the least
We have to dread from man or beast.

How should we like it were stars to burn
With a passion for us we could not return?
If equal affection cannot be,
Let the more loving one be me.

Admirer as I think I am
Of stars that do not give a damn,
I cannot, now I see them, say
I missed one terribly all day.

Were all stars to disappear or die,
I should learn to look at an empty sky
And feel its total dark sublime,
Though this might take me a little time.

Tidbits

Feb. 15th, 2011 04:55 pm
selenak: (Locke by Blimey)
Meanwhile, in New Zealand: Bilbo and the thirteen dwarves, i.e. the actors for the Hobbit film, out of costume for a group shot. Looking at this I again thought Martin Freeman for a younger Bilbo was an inspired choice on Peter Jackson's part. Also it's amusing to see Aidan Turner with the dwarvish beard. (And spot the Richard Armitage!)

(I wonder whether the casting will accomplish for dwarves what the LotR films did for hobbits and elves? I.e. turn a whole new brigade of slashers loose on an unsuspecting bunch of Tolkien characters whose sex lives were never the same again...)

There were a lot of fandom-themed funny valentines yesterday. Some favourites spotted:

A Very Special Battlestar Galactica Valentine Card (spoilers for the third season)

A hysterical bunch of Lost-themed Valentine Cards (naturally, the Ben one and the Locke one are my favourites, but the others are great as well; spoilers only for Kate's backstory)
selenak: (Shadows - Saava)
Five favorite tv series that started with bad pilot episodes.

Glad you asked! Though I shall stretch the definition of "bad" to "did nothing for me" in some cases, though they are hardly the same thing. Other cases are just plain bad, of course. :)

1.) Star Trek: The Next Generation. To be fair, the entire first season, the rare episode excepted, wasn't All That, but I still remember going back to the pilot after the show had finished, for the first time, all aglow in fannish love and misrembering stuff and then I rewatched and... err. CRINGE. SUPERCRINGE. Especially knowing the actors and later scriptwriters were capable of so much more. Which is why, when I want to pimp TNG, I NEVER go for the pilot.

2.) Babylon 5. By which I mean The Gathering, not the first episode of season 1. The Gathering has some good points - I still like the scene with Garibaldi and Londo in which Londo makes his "tawdry tourist attraction" remark, for example - but all in all, again, very much a good idea still in development and not one you'd use to advertise the show.

3.) Fringe. It has the downsides - the gore, the bad science - and not yet many of the virtues of the show. Olivia's trauma is standard noir and you could see it coming a mile away, and while I appreciate that her initial clashes with Broyles show her strength of character, introducing Broyles as someone who thinks sexual molestation isn't a big deal was a really bad idea. (Also weirdly incongruent with later characterisation.) Had I not known better things were to come, I might not have stuck with the show (and would have regretted it very much.)

4.) Doctor Who. To be fair, applying the concept of pilot episodes to something produced at the start of the 60s with a very different format is unfair, but I still wouldn't use An Unearthly Child to draw anyone in, or even to introduce the First Doctor, Barbara, Ian and Susan, especially if they're not familiar with 60s tv yet. (My showcase for the original Team TARDIS is The Aztecs. Which I defy anyone to watch and not love.) It's an eternity until something happens other than Barbara and Ian talking about how weird Susan is, One's characterisation is still very wobbly (caveman incident, what the hell?), and Barbara isn't yet her awesome later self, either. Now I didn't see this until I had seen a great deal of Seven, some Four, some Six, some Three and the first two seasons of New Who, so it wasn't a question of getting hooked or not, but if it had been my introduction to Whodom, I suspect it might have been a short-lived one.

5.) Highlander: The Series. It has good stuff - not least because that's the one and only time we see Connor on the show, and it's important to establish a connection between the original film and the series, plus it does a good job of introducing Tessa and Ritchie - but the reason why it nearly turned me off from watching was that Duncan himself, and the actual plot of the pilot, seemed terribly derivative. So there is this Highlander whose backstory sounds just like the other Highlander's, and the evil villain now donning a punk exterior in pursuit, who does his best to sound like the film's villain, too. Now I had liked the original film well enough - that was why I had tuned in - but a pale copy wasn't what I wanted to see. In due course, the show would establish its own rich universe, full of interesting characters (female and male) and with a focus on moral dilemmas that hadn't been there in the filmverse, plus Duncan would become very much his own character, but again - for pimping HL, I would never use the pilot.

****

I await pilot defenders for all five with bated breath. In other news:

a.) Stumbled across a rumour Brad Pitt wants to play John Lennon in a biopic; was suitably aghast. I mean, nothing against Brad, but my brain breaks when I attempt to imagine (ha!) him as John. Sidenote: not that previous screen Johns looked all that much like the late J.L., not least because actors tend to have a far more buff figure than musicians who were frighteningly thin at times to compensate for what they called their "fat Elvis" period, though yours truly would call it the period when he actually had some flesh on his bones. But still - Brad Pitt?

b.) A Dynasty prequel? Dynasty was a guilty vice of mine during the 80s. (It didn't dawn to me until later how outrageous the whole plotline with Blake killing his son's ex boyfriend was, since we were supposed to feel sorry for Blake there.) Back when I fell for Heroes it took me a while to make the connection and realise Noah Bennett was none other than Steven Carrington (second version), which was fairly mindboggling.

c) [personal profile] onyxlynx pointed me towards "The Rest is Noise", where I found a great essay about the two Rings - Wagner's and Tolkien's, that is. Very much reccommended if you're fond of either or both, and even if you're not.
selenak: (VanGogh - Lefaym)
I have the precious! Well, the theatrical release version of same. Again I couldn't resist and wait till November for the special edition. (Of which there is no trailer on this one, so see me pout a bit.)

Anyway, I just watched the film again and am full of the love for everyone concerned, from PJ, Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens (the most adorable trio of scriptwriting geeks ever - as proof I offer their audio commentaries on FotR and TTT) to the absolutely perfect cast to Howard Shore for the music to Ngila Dickson for the costumes to WETA for the effects... you get the picture. No, it's not that I think this film, or the other two, don't put a step wrong. In each installments, there were some things that rubbed me the wrong way. But these were never enough to distract me from the overall fannish devotion.

One the major achievements of the LotR film trilogy is, imo, the intensity of emotion it conveys. For which I credit the direction, the script and the performances equally. No matter whether it's a quiet moment, like Pippin's conversations with Gandalf on the balcony in Gondor or Theoden saying "I would have you smile again" to Eowyn, or one of those fierce outbursts, like Sam's "I will carry you" or Aragorn's "For Frodo", the sincerity and intensity of the feeling always carries me with it. And it's not just the major relationships which get the attention from script, direction and performances.

For example, a lesser director might have given us Frodo and Sam, but would not have bothered with Frodo and everyone else. In RotK, we have the poignant, tender and sad scene between Frodo and a very aged Bilbo, which reminds us of the affection we saw between them in FotR - and the fact that Bilbo's brief "Gollum" moment early in the adventure was the first time Frodo could see what the Ring was capable of doing to people. (And to someone he loved, no less.) When Bilbo asks Frodo about the Ring in RotK and Frodo replies "I lost it", Elijah Wood's face conveys the entire story - Frodo's realisation that the longing for the Ring really never does stop, despite its destruction, and that he and Bilbo both are damaged by it and can't remain in Middle Earth.

Each time I watch the brilliant intercutting between Faramir's suicidal charge, Denethor gorging himself and Pippin singing, I'm tempted to quote Wilfried Owen, because this is such a WWI moment, complete with the visual Saturn-eating-his-children/Abraham sacrificing his son associations Owen was so fond of. It's fascinating how Jackson manages to convey a very different emotion when Theoden leads his equally suicidal charge later. (Mainly, methinks, because Theoden tries to save lives and wasn't ordered to do this.)

A single illustration on the different way books and films work to achieve the same thing: in RotK of the novel, we have the "praise them with great praise" scene in which everyone celebrates the Hobbits' deeds with songs. Which is fine in a book, but if you did that on screen it would look inadvertantly funny. Whereas the equivalent in RotK the movie, the "my friends, you bow to no one" scene in which Aragorn kneels down in front of the Hobbits, with everyone following suit, does the same thing but does it cinematically. And again the perfect mixture of epic and intimate - the scene lives both from the effect that we see a great many people kneel, and from the expressions on the faces of our Hobbits - each one of the four takes this differently.

Speaking of facial expressions and cinematic shorthand - Sam drinking his beer determinedly, then standing up and the cut to Merry's, Pippin's and Frodos' amused and approving looks work better than an actual longer depiction of a scene between Sam and Rosie would have done.

Details, details:
- The hall in which Denethor resides reminds me of a chess board, both because of the floor and because of the statues. Which fits with the Denethor and Gandalf situation.
- The camera showing us Frodo writing in the Red Book near the end is the visual repetition of the scene introducing Bilbo in the special edition of FotR, but whereas the study in Bilbo's time looks clustered and homely, full of warm colours, it's spartan and empty in Frodo's case, symbolizing his ongoing devastation.
- Frodo smiling at his friends, the last image we see of him, repeats his first close-up from FotR as well, and both the similarity and difference between the smiles is heartbreaking
- and speaking of smiles: Theoden does see Eowyn smile again, after all, during those brief moments before he dies. Go forth, purists, and complain that it's Eomer in the book. I don't care. It has a rightness to it here.

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 04:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios