Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
selenak: (Clone Wars by Jade Blue Eyes)
It's my annual time of submission to the Mouse again, aka paying for Disney +, catching up with various things from last year.

Obi-Wan- Kenobi: mostly I liked it, though unfortunately a key scene had me muttering "you stole that from a Vader/Anakin & Ahsoka scene, screenwriter, I hope you're paying Dave Filoni" , more about this later.

Spoilery comments )

Thor: Love and Thunder: I am in the absolute minority of MCU watchers in that I didn't likie Thor: Ragnarök all that much - in fact, I liked the Thor content of Avengers: Infinity Wars better in what it did with Thor than the entirety of Ragnarök - and what I heard about this latest movie didn't inspire me to seek it out in the theatre. But since I did submit to the Mouse, I thought I might as well, and yeah. All the elements I disliked, multliplied, for two thirds of the movie. Spoilers ensue ) Look, I like my humor between the drama as much as the next fan, but Taika Waititi's brand just doesn't work for me.

In Disney- unrelated news, I also watched the last episode of The Serpent Queen's first season. (Is it the first? Or is that supposed to be it?)

Spoilers are better at this. )
selenak: (Black Widow by Endlessdeep)
I'm feeling a bit cranky, and it's about a month or so until Avengers: Endgame, so, a few less than popular MCU opinions by yours truly:

Opinions spoilery for the MCU movies so far ensue )

In non-MCU news, I marathoned the first season of Derry Girls, which consists of solely six episodes and has been reccomended to me a couple of times. It's a Northern Irish sit com, set in ye early 1990s, in the titular city. Our heroines are a couple of school girls plus one boy (James, first boy on an All Girls Catholic school because due to his being English, it's feared for his safety on a boys school), there'sa lot of black humor, sharp dialogue, and it manages to be very funny without prettifying the setting (of border controls and bombs, you know, all the joyful stuff the Brexiteers want to return to). In the course of the season, one of the girls comes out as gay, without this being given the "very special episode" treatment. And the headmistress is one of the best nun characters this side of Call the Midwife I've seen on tv in recent years, falling neither into the saintly nor in the evil abusive category; instead, she's a deadpan, matter-of-fact joy and further endears herself to me by wearing a post Vatican II habit instead of the full habit costumes US tv inflicts on its nuns more often than not, no matter when a show takes place. I hear the second season has just started, and hope next year Netflix will put it up as well.

Fanfic rec

Jul. 30th, 2018 05:00 pm
selenak: (Sternennacht - Lefaym)
Turns out that reccommending an old favourite makes one check up on the writer’s more recent productions, and was that ever rewarding! Behold what I found:

Brisingr (155649 words) by ironychan
Chapters: 31/31
Fandom: The Avengers (Marvel Movies)
Rating: Teen And Up Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Pepper Potts/Tony Stark, Jane Foster/Thor, Wanda Maximoff/Vision
Characters: Jane Foster (Marvel), Tony Stark, Vision (Marvel), Wanda Maximoff
Summary:

When Jane Foster discovers an object on a course for the inner solar system, it looks like a job for the Avengers. But when what looked like a comet turns out to be a refugee ship from another galaxy, it's not clear whose job this is anymore. Tony Stark and the Vision find they have an uncomfortable amount in common with the creatures called the Brisings, while Jane learns that the aliens are being followed by something they thought they'd left behind five million years ago. Set post-AOU, pre-CW.



This is a wonderfully well plotted story, with complicated aliens (who have their own history and want something other than invade) to please my inner Star Trek loving heart. It’s one of those rare Marvel fics to give Jane Foster a central role, and one that’s about Jane as a scientist. Also, it’s a fantastic example of how to write two characters with opposite povs on how to deal with a key issue (in this case Jane and Tony), with both of them having good reasons for their respective attitudes, without making either of them less than sympathetic or three dimensional. And it offers hands down the best use of MCU Vision I’ve yet seen in either fanfic or movies. In conclusion, I love it to bits!
selenak: (Undercover (Natasha and Steve) by Famira)
Or rather, really long stream of consciousness ramblings, with spoilers for everything. Before you embark on said ramblings, have a fun and fluffy fanfic rec, set post Winter Soldier and pre Age of Ultron, in which the team hangs out and enjoys some leftover weed. As you do.

Weird Science

Now, hear me ramble on. )
selenak: (Bayeux)
Though not much of one. I mean, I was entertained and amused, but all in all, like the first Guardian of the Galaxy movie (still haven't watched the second one), it was too jokey for me. And it took me a while to get beyond the first scene where Thor seems to have exchanged vocabulary with Tony Stark (they tone it down afterwards) (and even had a non-verbal joke stolen from Iron Man 3). Even taking into account he's spent a lot of time on Earth by now, that felt inconsistent.

(Otoh, it was consistent with general Marvel use of mythology that this movie's villain, Hella - because apparantly "Hel" won't do? - had as much in common with the Norse goddess Hel as Loki, Odin and Thor have with their namesakes, which is to say, not much, and she's got a completley different perdigree, too. Otoh, Cate Blanchett who plays her wasn't, like poor Christopher Eccleston in the last Thor movie, buried beneath prosthetics and make-up and got to do slinky villainy, so that was fun.)

Still: as I said, I was entertained. It was as advertised, colourful, funny, the whole Asgard family soap got to a satisfying (to me) conclusion, and for all my nitpicking about mythology, this is the first movie (if you ignore Thor's arrival in Avengers with a bolt of lightning) which actually puts Thor's mythic powers to good use. And for all that the use of both Hulk and Bruce Banner generally goes with the comic tone of the movie, I thought it got across something spoilery well )

Of the new characters, Valkyrie (I'm told she's not just any Valkyrie but Brunnhild? Who again hasn't got much in common with the mythological one other than having exiled herself and having issues) was fab, Jeff Goldblum had a blast as the Grand Master, and Hella's temporary sidekick Scourge even got a mini character arc of his own. (Which was more than Hella got who was simply there to provide menace, but hey.) And if Thor: The Dark World actually managed to sell me on Thor and Loki as siblings who grew up together and had mutually conflicted feelings (as opposed to just Loki hating Thor and Thor loving Loki, which was the impression the first Thor movie and Avengers left me with), Thor: Ragnarök at last made me fond of that particular sibling relationship. It helps that no one pretends Loki is actually competent at evil overlording, though. Not because of his hidden inner goodness, but because his speciality is messing things up, not building and ruling. Spoilers for Thor II and III here. ) The first Thor movie had both Thor and Loki start out as emotional teenagers, and Thor then subsequently grew up which Loki did not, but this latest movie, for all its determined comedy, provided the hope he just might now.

(Another thing that helps: is spoilery. ))

Alas, though, aside from the family soap opera, no other relationships of Thors are treated seriously. I mean, this is a movie in which spoilery things happen ) It's as if there was some editorial fiat that there must be absolutely no brooding in this movie and it should not be anything but funny, presumably as a counterpoint to Civil War? Which leaves me seeing the movie as the Chinese fortune cookie of Marvel movies: it's fun to consume, but there really isn't much inside.


Trivia:

- it fits inter Avengers relationships that Thor refers to "Stark" while Bruce refers to him as "Tony" (and apparantly noticed the tight fit of his trousers)

- yeah, okay, I'm still in stitches about the statue and the play

- if anyone is mourning Thor's long hair because of the trailer, he doesn't lose it until ca. 20 or even 30 minutes into the movie

- if this takes place two years after Age of Ultron, and the Steven Strange movie starts simultanously with the end of Civil War (since one of the cases Stephen Strange declines at the start is Rhodey's), how come Strange in his cameo here is already all routine about his powers?
selenak: (Obsession by Eirena)
I hiked these last few days, which inevitably means a lot of postings and mail to catch up with. However, I also watched a few things. The audio commentary of Thor: The Dark World told me that while I can hold out against Tom Hiddleston's characters no matter how popular - with my urgent need to see them slapped thankfully fulfilled in canon -, holding out against Tom Hiddleston himself is somewhat more difficult because he's just that charming. On the audio commentary, anyway. Completely into the MCU without any embarassment or need to emphasize he's a serious actor, etc. Full of praise for his fellow actors, not just the famous ones like Anthony Hopkins but also for the guy who plays a guard (whom he knows by name), and this fellow actor complimenting was how I found out that Josh Dallas, currently David/Prince Charming in Once Upon A Time, played Fandal in Thor (but not in The Dark World where his OuaT commitment meant he was replaced by Zach Levy). And he - Hiddleston, not Dallas - sounds distinctly smitten with Chris Hemsworth, so the internet did not lie about that one.

I also finished a miniseries from 1981 which the BBCiplayer is currently showing because of the WWI anniversary, The Life and Times of David Lloyd George, starring Philip Madoc, whom I had previously mainly associated with villainous Time Lords (I first saw him as the War Lord in the Second Doctor adventure The War Games) and Brother Cadfael (he played him in the radio dramatisations), in the title role. The series was written by Elaine Morgan, whom I must check out as a scriptwriter.

Now, here's what I knew about David Llyod George before watching: he was the British Prime Minister in the later part of WWI and thus also one of the Big Three at Versailles, and he was the most famous Welshman not an actor or writer since Wales got conquered. (I have since found out Winston Churchill put it a bit differently in his valediction after Lloyd George's death: "The greatest Welshman which that unconquerable race has produced since the age of the Tudors". This makes me wonder whether or not I count old Henry VII as a great Welshman. He certainly was a very successful one!) I didn't know anything else, which turns out to have been a big hole in my knowledge of British history. Most importantly, I did not know just how many key reforms Lloyd George was responsible for pre WWI, mostly as Chancellor of the Exchequer, laying the foundations of the British welfare system.

Some facts in case you are like me and lack D Ll G knowledge )

I also hadn't known he was both the last Liberal PM and regarded as one of the reasons for the party's decline into insignificance for many decades to come, and nothing whatsoever about his private life.

The Life and Times of David Lloyd George for the most part manages a good mixture of politics and personal life, perhaps only cheating in favour of the later in the last episode, covering the years in decline until death, where the biggest gaffe/embarrassment/sin/however you want to call it which a 20th century politician could make, old Lloyd George visiting Hitler in 1936 and concluding this was the German Washington, is covered (or rather, only alluded to) briefly in dialogue while the big relationship crisis with one of the two women in his life and the death of the other gets main emphasis and key scenes. In earlier episodes, however, many of the previous dramatic events which made me wonder re: their reality did turn out, as some research has shown me, to have been real, for example David Lloyd George resolutely protesting the Boer War in 1901, holding speeches against it everywhere in the country and getting almost lynched by a patriotic mob (32 people in the crowd did die that day) in Birmingham, only surviving because the politice smuggled him out in disguise as another policeman.

Crucially, the (obscured) Hitler interlude aside, I didn't have the impression the series was trying to sell me its main character as prettified. (Mind you, it is careful in the first episode not to mention that David Lloyd George is supposed to be in his early twenties when first making a splash as a young Welsh lawyer taking on the Anglican Church, because Philip Madoc, while made up to look younger, must have been in his 50s at best. But he's so good in the part I don't wish the show had picked a younger actor for the younger Lloyd George of the first two or three episodes.) It shows the two sides of his character traits - that drive and ability to talk most people into anything is great when employed to champion the poor, but he's also shown as a terrible, terrible husband when using them. By which I mean: not only did he apparantly believe fidelity was for other people while jealous himself, but he was great at pulling just about every "you know, this is really your fault" excuse of cheating husbands ever, and it takes his wife Maggie a while to become immune to this type of mindmessing.

Most importantly, the series narrative doesn't play Maggie and the other key woman in Lloyd George's life, Frances Stevenson, against each other. As so many biopics do, going for the "she just was too narrow minded/couldn't understand his genius whereas X was his soulmate" route (Walk the Line, much as I liked the film, did this, and so did the two John Lennon biopics focusing on his relationship with Yoko re: his first wife Cynthia.) Instead, the series presents both Maggie and Frances - who started out as the governess of the youngest Lloyd George daughter in 1911, then became his secretary and his lover in 1913 and remained with him for thirty years while he remained married to Maggie until Maggie's death, basically living in two households until then, whereupon after two years of fierce arguments with his children he married Frances - as sympathetic and three dimensional, and gives narrative weight to both relationships, instead of declaring one as True Love and the other as Lesser. Frances - who was one of the first female secretaries (or as we'd describe her job today, P.A. to a key cabinet member and then the first female secretary to a British Prime Minister - tends to talk more politics with him, but that doesn't mean Maggie is presented as apolitical (we see her succesfully campaign in Wales for Lloyd George when he's busy campaigning in the rest of the country) or without her own opinions (she's completely against him continuing the coalition with the Tories post WWI).

Other than Maggie and Frances, the female characters who get deeper characterisation than a few lines are two of Lloyd George's daughters, Mair (who dies young at age 17) and Megan (after finding out the truth about her father's relationship with her former governess the big Frances hater of the family, and following her father into politics). The important male supporting characters are his uncle Lloyd (Welsh shoemaker and preacher who raised him), brother William (type supportive Faithful Lieutenant) and young Winston Churchill (type Ambitious Lieutenant). It was interesting to me that a show made in 1981 chose to not only use the occasional Welsh but also doesn't subtitle it. (You can usually guess the meaning from the context.) Which is historically accurate - David Lloyd George being to date the only British PM whose first language wasn't English, and a little googling tells me Philip Madoc also had Welsh as his first language -, but that usually doesn't stop fictional depictions to avoid other languages.

Lastly: two quotes about Lloyd George not in the series but which, hungry for more after watching, I found and which struck me as capturing the personality as given by the series:

What Lloyd George failed to understand was no man, however gifted, is a major political power in himself. He can teach, he can preach, he can make a significant contribution, but power politics is a struggle between social forces, not a duel between individuals. Once the war was over the Tories had no more use for him. He was an outsider, an upstart Welsh lawyer who had got above himself. (Jennie Lee, Baroness Lee of Asheridge in My Life With Nye (1980))

David Lloyd George was the best-hated statesman of his time, as well as the best loved. The former I have good reason to know; every time I made a pointed cartoon against him, it brought batches of approving letters from all the haters. Looking at Lloyd George's pink and hilarious, head thrown back, generous mouth open to its fullest extent, shouting with laughter at one of his own jokes, I thought I could see how it was that his haters hated him. He must have been poison to the old school tie brigade, coming to the House an outsider, bright, energetic, irrepressible, ruthless, mastering with ease the House of Commons procedure, applying all the Celtic tricks in the bag, with a talent for intrigue that only occasionally got away from him.
I always had the greatest difficulty in making Lloyd George sinister in a cartoon. Every time I drew him, however critical the comment, I had to be careful or he would spring off the drawing-board a lovable cherubic little chap. I found the only effective way of putting him definitely in the wrong in a cartoon was by misplacing this quality in sardonic incongruity — by surrounding the comedian with tragedy.
(Cartoonist David Low)

Also: as it turned out I knew the theme of the series already, because it was composed by Ennio Morricone and became a breakout hit:

selenak: (Black Widow by Endlessdeep)
In short: an enjoyable and entertaining fantasy movie. Not a must, but just plain likeable.

Also set exclusively in England and in outer space, which has to be a first for Marvel movies )
selenak: (The Doctor by Principiah Oh)
So Christopher Eccleston plays the main villain in Thor 2. Colour me amused that the IGN article reassures us that "Eccleston is no stranger to comic book-oriented fare having played Destro in G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra and having a stint on the TV series Heroes", but doesn't mention at all he was the Ninth Doctor (despite using a photo of Eccleston in that role). He really goes out of his way to play that connection down, doesn't he?

Anyway, I'm looking forward to see him menace Asgard. With or without Elven ears. Can we get a scene where he's witheringly unimpressed by Loki and his emo, pretty please? Few people do witheringly unimpressed and sarcastic as well as Eccleston.
selenak: (Black Widow by Endlessdeep)
In case anyone is wondering, the reason why I haven't reviewed this week's Borgias episode yet is that I haven't had a chance to watch it. I'm currently at a conference in Rudolstadt. However, something you can do at conferences now and then is reading fanfiction. 

Before I get to my recs: I think I have identified my off turn for reading fanfic in Avengers fanfic quicker than usual. You know, the part of the summary that makes me go "hell, no!"  and look for another story. In Avengers stories, this is anything resembling the phrase "Loki needs a hug". I'm not against redeeming the genocidal little twerp per se on fanfic, but for me that would have to start with not only the writer but also Loki himself acknowledging he is a genocidal little twerp (and when I say "genocidal", I'm actually referring to events from Thor, not The Avengers, because if I read one more time that in Thor,  Loki was the wronged party throughout, I'm tempted to aquire a tesseract and send the commenter in question to the Frost Giants, who would have been wiped out entirely, global scale, if Loki had succeeded in his plans). Not with Avenger X, or the entire team, deciding that he's really a fluffy kitten that needs to be stroked.

(A longer post is brewing on why some villains do it for me in terms of fannish love and some don't, though I can find them interesting, and ditto for some redemption stories; I think a key criterium is the willingness on the part of the villain to accept responsibilities for his or her actions instead of continuing to be an eternal 13 years old in "nobody understands me, everyone is so mean to me, anything I do is always someone else's fault" mindframe. The reason why Faith's story is arguably the best redemption story in the Jossverse isn't because she had it tough or there were extenuating circumstances but because Faith got to a point where she stopped blaming others, notably Buffy, turned herself in to the police and spent some time in prison, and that she did it not because she got a soul or because she wanted a better relationship with someone, but because she didn't want to continue as she had been and let others pay for her issues.) 

The Black Widow, of course, is one of the Marvelverse characters starting out as villains and becoming heroes. Her origins were retconned repeatedly, but one of the many reasons why I want a Black Widow movie is that the hints we get there about Natasha's past make me think the version the movieverse will/would go with would include Natasha doing bad things, not simply having bad things done to her. Note that Natasha doesn't either glorify her past or make apologies for it; she owns it, it made her what she is now, and she acts on that, but not in a way of entitlement that the world owes her anything; the reverse. As opposed to certain Asgardians, she's actually an adult. And not surprisingly in most of the stories I'm going to reccommend today.

A now finished Natasha and Bruce centric series full of prickly distrust and mutual issues but also slowly accepting and letting down guards. Great to read, and the parallel transformation of the Avengers from misfits thrown together by necessity into actual friends feels very real, too.

Love is for children: this one transfers the current version of comicverse Natasha's origin story into the movieverse (which means heavy tie-ins to the Winter Soldier story, aka the most popular Captain America tale wherein it turns out his WW II sidekick Bucky was transformed into a master assassin by the KGB).  Dark, with a smidgeon of hope and really well written.

The Hammer and the Ice: short but elegant AU in which Jane Foster has Erik Solvig's role in The Avengers

Choosing Anger: excellent Bruce pov throughout the film.

and now for two meta recs:

Great Natasha meta, specifically on how the script presents her.  I concurr with the poster in every regard. 

Meta on the various relationships between all of the characters, for which I even braved tumblr,  because it's such a joy to read.
selenak: (Arthur by Voi)
So, I may have watched The Avengers three times already. Um. I don't think I liked anything Joss Whedon did so much since Astonishing X-Men, which fits, and AXM was the best Joss thing since Buffy for me, and here I include Firefly, sorry, browncoats. Anyway, this coming shortly after rewatching Merlin seasons 3 and 4 suddenly made me realise that movieverse Thor and Loki = Arthur and Morgana, Merlin version, and that post-Thor and Avengers Thor and later seasons Arthur should start a Multiverse support group for How To Handle Your Still Beloved Sibling The Sociopath. Part of the program, which was written together after much brainstorming and shared mead:

1.) (All)Father. As in, best not mention him, since according to your sibling everything is his fault, which they at least partly may be right about. One of the problem is that even if you're prepared to discuss his faults, this somehow leads to "he always liked you better" which is bemusing because you have distinct childhood and adolescent memories of Dad being all agoo over the Dark Haired Ones and never lecturing them on their duties half as much.

2.) That Throne Is Mine. This point of discussion never goes anywhere, either. Part of your growth process as heroes means you have your doubts about your own qualification for rulership, but since the Beloved Sibling spends their interrmittent time on the top with killing people for sport, they clearly are not an option for the throne at all. Consultant Darcy scribbled a note on the program saying "offer throne to third party = everybody wins?", offered by a note by consultant Merlin writing "not unless third party is also side of coin", which does not sense to anyone.

3.) How To Make An Angsty Reunion Last. On the one hand, combining questions of "why" and reassurances of ongoing affection with physical closeness heighten the effect; on the other, they also give YSBSTS the chance to do some physical violence, so watch out for that.


On a less kidding note, I really did love a spoilerly scene ). It's my dysfunctional siblings thing, I suppose, which also contributed to me digging the Arthur and Morgana reunion scene from Sword in the Stone II so much.

Unrelated to siblings but still in Avengers territory: I also found out that while we non-Americans got the movie first, we did not get a second post-credit scene, and the Americans do. What treachery is this? Here, oh fellow non-Americans, is a screen cap of said scene, which is spoilery. )
selenak: (Bardolatry by Cheesygirl)
I never wrote a review of Thor back when I watched the film, not because I didn't like it, but because I didn't feel passionately about it one way or the other. I was mildly entertained, agreed with many others that the female characters fare much better than in any other superhero film in recent memory, and I also liked the genre atypical attention paid to getting civilians to safety so they weren't harmed in the big action set piece showdown (and who, again atypically for the genre, chose the task of civilian rescue as opposed to taking part in the big action set piece). However, that was about it as far as my reaction was concerned. Flash forward a few months and many another watchers's reactions later, and I find I do have something to say after all. For the very character who was and is the universal favourite in Thor viewerdom, Loki, only elicited a big "eh" from me, and I finally figured out why, when in theory I should have been all over him, given my usual fannish tendencies.

Read more... )
selenak: (Hank by Stacyx)
Fandom: I'm so jaded observations of the day:

1.) I watched and enjoyed Thor, and watching it, I knew already that this version of Loki was going to prove fangirl catnip, resulting in cries of woobie! and mass adoption, complete with Loki/everyone pairings. So colour me completely unsurprised that this is exactly what happened. (What did me surprise me a little is that this includes lots of Loki/Sif, because "hey, I like X who is nifty, and Y who is nifty, and never mind they didn't have much screen interaction, they should totally shag!" is more likely to happen on the slash side of the force - case in point: those two guys from Inception whose names I can't even remember anymore -, so hooray for equality there.) I think in ye olde days of my personal fandom I probably would have gone the same way, but in my current mood I'm more inclined to be cynical and demand an equally cynically minded vidder vid woobies from several fandoms - Loki, Lex, maybe Lindsay from Angel to the tune of "I'm just a soul whose intentions are good, pleaaaaase don't let me be so misunderstood". In lack of that, I'm tempted to rewatch some of Being Human season 3, or, as I personally subtitle it, Revenge on the Woobies.

2.) Speaking of equality: the way Ursula from The Borgias immediately became the most hated character of the show in fandom was a good demonstration that vilification and bashing of a female character for the perceived sin of coming between a popular couple works with het couples as well as slash couples. Complete with bashing of the actress for her perceived lack of prettiness. I mean, I knew that, of course, but I find it especially annoying in my shiny new fandom because the source text has been ever so good to avoid pitching women against each other. Bah.

Fandom: I'm so gleeful observations of the day:

1.) Yesterday [personal profile] andraste posted a link to a new clip from X-Men: First Class, which made me even happier on the Mystique and Xavier front, today I find yet more goodness in that regard. The First Class scene, for those of you not reading Andraste's journal:



I love the linked exchange between the adult versions and Erik as well and yet again am so glad about this idea of making little Raven and Charles each other's first other mutants, as well as giving them a relationship in their own right before either establishes one with Erik. As I said to [profile] artaxastra, borrowing a comparison to another fandom, if before Mystique was Saavik as far as we knew, now she's Leonard McCoy. Not that Saavik isn't a great character in her own right, but McCoy simply has another status in the narrative. (Also, the dialogue which [Bad username or unknown identity: Quigonejinn"] quotes in the post I linked above sounds like OT3 bait. I'm trying to resist. Actually, no, scratch that, I don't.)

2.) So, once upon a time (1965, to be precise), David Bailey, star photographer in 60s London, famous enough to be an icon in his own right (and to be the model of the photographer from Blow Up), was supposed to photograph the 50 most influential people in England. Bailey included himself in this as well as all five Rolling Stones but only wanted John Lennon of the Beatles, on the ground of considering them a silly boy band (though he later admitted he liked the late music from the White Album onwards), being a die hard Stones fan, and according to rumour being somewhat interested in John. John insisted on bringing Paul along for the sessions, which means we have the iconic moptop era Lennon/McCartney photographs from David Bailey. Who said he felt "a tension, an animosity" between them during the session and asked them to look away from each other to convey that in photo. What tickles me every time I think of it is that the Bailey photographs convey anything but animosity to each other as published then, and every time Bailey releases yet new prints from that session where they're all over each other and can't keep to the "look away, damm it!" instruction for longer than two pictures, his statement becomes even more hilarious. Now you'd think after a few decades we know even the most rejected print from that session, but no. Due to tumblr, I saw today David B. has released even more outtakes. The animosity, it is burning, I tell you. Burning.

Also below an lj cut to protect your innocent eyes )

So that was fun to look at. (Btw, considering Bailey was one of the people who spoke at Linda McCartney's memorial service, I assume he and Paul made up later.) I do suspect that must have been the most interesting of the scheduled photo sessions, other than the ones Astrid Kirchherr did with them in Hamburg, that is. (Linda's photos of them were snapshots which is something else again.)
selenak: (bodyguard - Sabine)
I bring links, in lieu of a more content-full post, due to real life business.

Firstly: having to do the usual promotion stuff when a film is released, Kenneth Branagh does the chat show tour for Thor. (Which btw I liked, only I don't have the time for a proper review.) Except that the chat he does with Craig Ferguson quickly turns into a discussion of a) Scandinavia, by) Doctor Who (they're both fans) and c) James Bond actors. Our Ken champions Roger Moore, defending him against the furious Ferguson onslaught with the same arguments Jonathan Levinson uses against Warren Mears in a Buffy season 6 episode: Roger Moore was funny! Henceforth I will see Kenneth B. as Jonathan. Ferguson, ototh, turns out to have more in common with Warren than just choice of Bonds. When they're talking DW - btw, am happy to report K.B. is a "love them all" type of Whovian both for Doctors and Companions - he does a slightly repulsive nudge, nudge, wink, wink thing about how as a director, Branagh should get in touch with the very very attractive Karen Gillian, if you know what I mean, nudge, wink some more. He's getting the polite Irish-British brush-off for this, I'm happy to report, and slightly redeems himself by geeking out about his portable TARDIS and displaying it for Ken's benefit. Anyway, check it out: Kenneth Branagh talks Doctor Who and James Bond with Craig Ferguson.

Because someone had to do the satire sooner rather than later: Darth Vader announces the death of Obi-Wan Kenobi. Make sure to read the comments as well. My favourite is the one pointing out it's all a distraction from the matter of Vader's birth certificate.

Shiny space station fanfiction:

Babylon 5: Sleepover: a new (to me, anyway) Londo/G'Kar story is something to me treasured. *loves pioneered pairing as fervently as ever*

Deep Space Nine: In Due Season: the backstory of the Prophet(s) and Sisko's biological mother remains a tried and true red button for me, so I'm always glad to see someone tackle it intelligently and sensitively. As happens here.

Seriously?

Dec. 11th, 2010 02:49 pm
selenak: (Olivia Dunam by Zombie_Boogie)
First of all, Fringe-wise, I'm reminded again how I dislike pairing nicknames that smash names together. "Polivia"? Seriously? And then FFN tells me there's also "Walstrid". HELP.

Lo and behold, there's a Thor trailer. Mind you, Thor has never been the Marvel character to interest me most, but the recent cartoons have made me sort of fond of the guy, plus I really am curious how Kenneth Branagh will pulll off directing a superhero film. In present day. With Norse gods. Also, Agent Coulson appears to be back in a major role, and the Iron Man films have made me fond of him.

Thor trailer below the cut )

In other news, I wish I had known about this when I wrote either collection of contradictory John Lennon quotes or my post on the gory musical bitchfest of 71 complete with 73 reconciliation, because it fits so well with either. So on John Lennon's 31st birthday in 1971, our hero parties with friends (Klaus Voorman, Ringo) and the local New York cultural scene (Ginsberg), and, as you'd expect at a birthday party with these participants, there are plenty of drinks, pot... and there's singing. Naturally. What, oh kind readers, do you think John sings just before and after everyone sings their "happy birthday, dear John" for him? Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey. Which happens to be a song from Ram, Paul McCartney's second solo album. You know, the very one that recently (i.e. the very same year) caused John to go ballistic (details on why in the above linked musical bitching of 1971 post) and put How Do You Sleep? on his second solo album, Imagine, with such lines like "the sound you make is muzak to my ears". After finishing with Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey, just to make it completely perfect, he starts with George's My Sweet Lord, recently mentioned by the birthday child in interviews thusly ("Int.: Do you have any regrets about not doing the Bangladesh concert?" John: I don't want to play "My Sweet Lord."). And then (no longer on the clip below, alas), just to show how utterly over everyone he really is, he sings... Yesterday.

You can't make this up, people. Reality always does it better.



Incidentally, if you're not familiar with the McCartney song the birthday party is chorusing, the full length version is here; "Admiral Halsey", aka the part John is singing between getting birthday-serenaded is here. The only thing even better would have been if he'd sung Too Many People (you know, the one with the "that was your first mistake/ you took your lucky break/ and broke it in two" and "too many people preaching practices/don't let them tell you what you want to be" lines). Oh, wait....

Profile

selenak: (Default)
selenak

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 23 456 7
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22 232425 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 01:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios